Reviews You Can Rely On

Best Scanner of 2021

Credit: Jenna Ammerman
By Michelle Powell and Benjamin Hickok  ⋅  Jun 18, 2021
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more
We researched over 40 scanners and spent weeks scanning thousands of pages using 9 of the best scanners on the market in 2021. We found the best model for you to digitize your documents, receipts, and old photos. We carefully evaluated each model's scan quality, speed, and how easy it is to manage the resulting digital files. Whether you're just looking to digitize a few receipts here and there, have a stack of old photos that you want to preserve digitally, or have mountains of documents that need to be saved for posterity, our testing results will help you choose the right model for the right price.

Top 9 Product Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 9
< Previous | Compare | Next >
 
Awards Editors' Choice Award  Top Pick Award Best Buy Award Top Pick Award 
Price $495 List
$399.99 at Amazon
$350 List$1,200 List
$760.00 at Amazon
$110 List
$89.98 at Amazon
$295 List
$247.49 at Amazon
Overall Score Sort Icon
88
75
71
70
66
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Fast, high-quality scans, easy to use, touch screen interface, 50 page feed trayHigh quality scans, easy operation, good text recognition80-page automatic document feeder, fast, high quality scansGreat scan quality, small and portable, simple operation, good OCRHigh quality scans, easy to use software
Cons Expensive, Optical Character Recognition not perfectSlower than other high end modelsExpensive, text recognition not perfect, somewhat complicated installationSlowRelatively slow, 10-page document feeder feels limiting
Bottom Line The fastest, most fully-featured, easy to use, and highest quality scanner we've testedA great option that competes with higher-end models, at a budget-friendly priceA high-end scanner that is great for those that need to scan hundreds of pages per dayA great balance between performance, quality, and portability, all at a reasonable priceThis model produces high-quality scans, is easy to use, and is good at scanning lots of short documents
Rating Categories Fujitsu ScanSnap... Epson WorkForce... Fujitsu Fi-7160... Brother DS-640 Fujitsu ScanSnap...
Scanning Performance (35%)
9
8
7
9
8
Speed (30%)
10
7
8
4
5
Software (20%)
7
7
6
8
7
User Friendliness (15%)
8
8
7
7
6
Specs Fujitsu ScanSnap... Epson WorkForce... Fujitsu Fi-7160... Brother DS-640 Fujitsu ScanSnap...
Paper Sizes Max: 11" x 17"
Min: 2" x 2"
Max: 8.5" x 240"
Min: 2" x 2"
A4, A5, A6, B5, B6, Business Card, Post Card, Letter, Legal and Custom Size. Max: 8.5" x 32" A4, A5, A6, B5, B6, Business card, Post card, Letter, Legal and Custom size
Weight (pounds) 7.5 lbs 8.1 lbs 9.3 lbs 1.0 lbs 3.1 lbs
Resolution (dpi) 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600
Simplex/Duplex Duplex Duplex Duplex Simplex Duplex
Scanning Modes Color, Grayscale, Auto Color, Grayscale, Black and White Color, Grayscale, Black and White, Automatic Detection 24-bit color, 8-bit (256 levels) gray scale, 1 bit monochrome Color, Grayscale, Black and White, Automatic Detection
Automatic Document Feeder 50-page 50-page 80-page No 10-page
PC Compatible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Mac Compatible Yes Yes 3rd party drivers Yes Yes
Measured Pages Per Minute 67 14 21 4 13


Best Overall Scanner


Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1600


88
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Scanning Performance 9
  • Speed 10
  • Software 7
  • User Friendliness 8
Pages Per Minute: 67 | Automatic Document Feeder Capacity: 50 pages
Extremely Fast
High-quality scans
Easy operation
Touch screen interface
Expensive
Character recognition not perfect

The Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1600 is our top recommendation for those who have any job or small business that demands high quality, speed, and ease of use. Thanks to a large automatic document feeder and extremely fast speed, this model turns a 50-page document into a PDF in a flash with a single push of a button. The resulting PDF looks great because this machine can accurately and crisply render everything from tiny text to detailed graphics. The user experience is also simple, as the iX1600 offers a large LCD touchscreen, with an intuitive interface that makes both setup and use a breeze.

While the iX1600 did suffer from some errors in its optical character recognition, which is a common problem for many models, its only serious downside is its premium price. The vast majority of people out there likely don't scan enough to justify this model's higher price point. However, the investment is well worth the time and effort you'll save while producing the highest-quality scans, especially if your job requires you to scan several hundred pages of documents per day.

Read review: Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1600

Best Bang for the Buck


Brother DS-640


70
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Scanning Performance 9
  • Speed 4
  • Software 8
  • User Friendliness 7
Pages Per Minute: 4 | Automatic Document Feeder Capacity: N/A
Great scan quality
Very small and portable
Simple operation
Good OCR
Not great for long (10+ page) documents

For many people, the ideal scanner is one that can easily and conveniently digitize a short document or receipt whenever needed, and then easily disappear out of sight until it is needed again. If you fall into this category of user, then it's hard to beat the Brother DS-640. In our tests, this model consistently produced high-quality PDFs that looked nearly identical to the originals, almost perfectly used optical character recognition that made documents completely text searchable and offered both simple and easy-to-use document management. Perhaps the most important and impressive feature is its size. The scanner itself is about the size of a standard power strip, weighs just over one pound, and can be powered via USB. All this means you can quickly plug it into your laptop when it's needed, then easily hide it away when not in use. You can even toss it in your backpack next to your laptop if you need to scan documents on the go. It's a compact, and robust scanner at a relatively low price.

The only real downside to this model is its speed. Each page must be manually fed, so digitizing longer documents can be a slow and cumbersome process. The process gets even more time-consuming due to the lack of a duplex scanning feature, meaning every double-sided page must be fed through twice. For reference, it took us two and a half minutes to digitize five double-sided pages with the Brother DS-640, a task that models with automatic document feeders easily handled in under 30 seconds. If you consistently scan documents that are longer than 10 pages, this isn't the model for you. Still, for many people, the Brother DS-640*offers everything you need and nothing you don't, at a price that won't break the bank.

Read review: Brother DS-640

Best for High Volume Scanning


Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed


71
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Scanning Performance 7
  • Speed 8
  • Software 6
  • User Friendliness 7
Pages Per Minute: 21 | Automatic Document Feeder Capacity: 80 pages
80-page automatic document feeder
Fast
High-quality scans
Expensive
Text recognition not perfect
Somewhat complicated installation

The Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed could save you a ton of time and effort if your job or business requires you to digitize long documents with any sort of frequency. It features a large 80-page automatic document feeder that can process a large stack of documents with the single push of a button. Even with the quick performance, the scan quality is still high quality, and the software managing the resulting files is easy and intuitive to use. It also does reliable character recognition to cement its place as the Ferrari of document scanners.

The Fi-7160's glaring drawback is its less than budget-friendly price tag. This machine is only worth purchasing if you consistently have a sizeable scanning workload, where time savings could offset the significant investment.

Read review: Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed

Best Flatbed Scanner


Epson Perfection V39


59
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Scanning Performance 8
  • Speed 4
  • Software 4
  • User Friendliness 7
Pages Per Minute: 2 | Automatic Document Feeder Capacity: N/A
Excellent photo scan quality
Easy setup
Relatively Inexpensive
Software can be a bit clunky
Very slow for long text documents

A flatbed model is the way to go if your scanning tasks are geared more towards photos and book pages than text documents, and the Epson Perfection V39 is one of the most effective and inexpensive options we've found to handle those tasks. During our testing, it produced crisp and vivid photo scans without hassle.

The V39 has a very budget-friendly price point, making it a very economical way to digitize your memories into a digital photo collection that will last forever. It's a relatively slim model, with a kickstand that allows it to stand upright. It can also be powered through a USB port and can be stashed away when not in use. It is also quick to get up and running whenever you need it.

Like all flatbed models without a feed tray, it will take quite a while to scan long text documents with the Epson Perfection V39. It is also unable to scan film negatives, which is something many old-school photography enthusiasts might be looking for in a photo scanning device. The upgraded Epson V600 does boast this feature and might be worth your consideration if you need to scan negatives. However, those are minor downsides for someone merely looking to digitize a personal collection of photos, which is where the V39 excels.

Read review: Epson Perfection V39

Best for High-Quality Portable Scanning


Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300i


66
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Scanning Performance 8
  • Speed 5
  • Software 7
  • User Friendliness 6
Pages Per Minute: 13 | Automatic Document Feeder Capacity: 10 pages
High-quality scans
Portable
Good OCR
Expensive
Slower than comparable non-portable models

If you have a job or business that requires making high-quality scans, at a variety of locations, then you would be hard-pressed to find a better scanner than the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300i. It combines the crystal clear scan quality and accurate optical character recognition of the Fujitsu brand and crams it into a package that can fit in a backpack. It even has a retractable automatic document feeder that can support up to 10 pages, so you can quickly scan longer documents wherever you go.

The biggest downside of the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300i is the price point. You will have to pay a premium for the premium portable scanning features and abilities. The ScanSnap S1300i is also slower than comparably priced but less-portable models. Those looking for a device that can scan documents on the move and deal with longer (50+ page) jobs in the office may not be satisfied with its overall speed. However, despite these minor drawbacks, the ScanSnap S1300i is the best option on the market for portable scanners.

Read review: Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300i

Great for Small Scanning Jobs


Scanner Pro App


62
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Scanning Performance 7
  • Speed 3
  • Software 8
  • User Friendliness 8
Pages Per Minute: N/A | Automatic Document Feeder Capacity: N/A
Inexpensive
High-quality scans
Great text recognition
Slow and laborious for multi-page documents

For only a few bucks, the Scanner Pro App provides all the firepower needed if your scanning needs are ordinarily just a few receipts or a 1-2 page document per week. This app uses some powerful software to essentially turn your smartphone's camera into a high-quality scanner. As long as you have a flat, relatively monochrome surface against which to snap an image, the scans are automatically cropped and come out looking surprisingly crisp. Since the resulting files end up on your phone, it is effortless to then attach them to emails or texts, or upload them to the cloud storage service of your choice. It even offers optical character recognition that rivals the accuracy of the software found on dedicated scanning devices.

Using your phone's camera to scan documents does come with some inherent downsides. First off, since you need to frame each shot, the process is relatively slow, which isn't a big deal when working with one or two pages, but it can quickly get time-consuming when scanning multiple-page documents. Also, you have to be careful not to cast shadows on the materials you're scanning, or they can come out looking smudged. Still, this is an incredibly inexpensive way to scan receipts and short documents on the go and can likely replace a dedicated model for many people.

Read review: Scanner Pro App

Compare Products

select up to 5 products to compare
Score Product Price Our Take
88
$495
Editors' Choice Award
A fast, fully featured, high quality scanner that is easy to use
75
$350
A solid, high-end model that doesn't cost quite as much as most other high-end options
71
$1,200
Top Pick Award
If you're scanning documents all day, this model makes your life easier but is a big investment
70
$110
Best Buy Award
While not the fastest, it excels in every aspect at a relatively low price
66
$295
Top Pick Award
Can handle a lot of short documents quite well, but the lack of a paper tray and large document feeder makes it less suited to scanning lots of large documents
62
$0.00
You can give it a try without any risk, and packs a lot of performance into a phone app, but isn't great for longer documents
61
$230
Good if you value accuracy, but photo scans could be better
59
$100
Top Pick Award
A great choice for those that mostly need to scan photos and book/magazine pages
22
$70
Offers no advantages over a phone app, and does not compete with other scanners we tested

Why You Should Trust Us


Steven Tata and Max Mutter began testing home office products in 2016. They've used and analyzed more than 200 scanners, printers, shredders, and Chromebooks in the intervening years. That experience has given them a unique understanding of how to evaluate the quality of both printed and digital text and images and the common pitfalls of the software controls for common desktop devices. Their knowledge allows them to accurately assess whether a scanning device can do everything that it needs to without creating too many complications or annoyances for the user.

This review comprises more than 150 hours of setup, software installation, file management, spot-checking optical character recognition, and scanning paper documents, IDs, and passports. We used each of these models in just about every way possible. Whether you're seeking a powerhouse to turn giant stacks of paper into text-searchable PDFs or just need an efficient way to digitize your receipts, we can lead you to the perfect device.

Analysis and Test Results


In a world where our lives are increasingly organized in the digital realm, many institutions still insist on using paper documents to communicate important information. That's where a scanner comes in, allowing you to digitize the vital information on those scattered scraps into an easily organizable, searchable, and savable format. Since scanning is both an essential and annoying task, we focused most of our scoring on how well and how quickly each model can digitize documents.

Incredible speed, high quality performance, and ease of use are all...
Incredible speed, high quality performance, and ease of use are all hallmarks of the Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1600.
Credit: Jason Peters


Value


When it comes to digitizing documents, you're mostly paying for two things: speed and scan quality. High-priced models like the Fujitsu iX1600 ScanSnap or Fi-7160 Sheetfed get you crystal clear text and can tear through pages in a flash. A more inexpensive model like the Brother DS-640 can still provide impressive scan quality, but at only a fraction of the scanning speed, making it a great value for less frequent use. The Epson Perfection V39 offers a reasonable value for scanning photos, but you again sacrifice the ability to scan long documents quickly.

Scanning Performance


A scan is useless if it isn't legible, so our first step in finding the best model was to assess the quality of the scans that each model produced. Our testing focused on printed type, handwritten notes, and receipts. Although our document scanners aren't ideal for photos, we also scanned some images to see how well each model performed in that capacity. We then graded each model based on the clarity and color accuracy of their scans. We found that every model could generally produce great-looking text, with a few exceptions. However, when it came to how well each model could render color documents, differences were apparent.


The Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1600 quickly earned the top ranking in our scan quality tests. It produces crystal clear characters on an entirely white background and renders text documents and graphs to near perfection. It also does a surprisingly good job scanning photos, maintaining accurate colors and composition. The only reason it didn't earn a perfect score is that it can occasionally make some images look oversaturated. However, it is still leaps and bounds ahead of all the other document-oriented models we tested in that regard.

The iX1600 produced the highest quality scans in our testing.
The iX1600 produced the highest quality scans in our testing.
Credit: Steven Tata

The Brother DS-640, despite its relatively low price tag, also earned a top spot on our scan quality scoreboard. Throughout our tests, it rendered PDFs with clear text and accurate colors. It even did a decent job of scanning photographs (though we wouldn't feed treasured old photos through it for fear they'd be bent — a flatbed model is still best for such an application).

Despite a relatively low price tag, the Brother DS-640 produced some...
Despite a relatively low price tag, the Brother DS-640 produced some of the best looking scans in our testing.

Two different models land on the second step on our scanning performance podium. The Fujitsu Scansnap S1300i and the Epson WorkForce ES-400 both create clear and crisp text documents but lack the ScanSnap iX1600's proclivity for maintaining color accuracy when scanning photos. Neither model does a poor job of scanning photos, but the colors just look a little muted in comparison. The Scansnap S1300i also creates some smudging issues when scanning receipts, but it never produced anything illegible.

The next tier is occupied by the two Epson flatbed models that we tested, the V600 and the V39. Both produce excellent quality photo scans and are more than up to the task of digitizing your family albums. The V600 can even scan film negatives, something the V39 cannot do. They both create great-looking digital copies of text documents, but they do so much more slowly than the dedicated document models.

The Epson Perfection V39 creates great scans of everything from...
The Epson Perfection V39 creates great scans of everything from photos to book pages.
Credit: Steven Tata

The Epson Perfection V600 also creates great photo scans with a...
The Epson Perfection V600 also creates great photo scans with a slightly higher resolution than those from the V39.
Credit: Steven Tata

Next, the Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed excels in scanning text documents and receipts. Color scans of photos and graphs often look just a bit muted compared to the originals, but all in all, this machine produces fantastic scans.

The Scanner Pro App performed impressively in our scan quality testing. This app allows you to create high-quality and text searchable pdfs with no extra hardware by turning the camera on your phone into a scanner. If you manage to find the perfect lighting, the resulting scans are nearly flawless. However, it is easy to get shadows on the corners of the document. While this doesn't take away from the scan's usefulness, it can make it look a bit odd.

The Scanner Pro App, which uses your smartphone&#039;s camera to create...
The Scanner Pro App, which uses your smartphone's camera to create PDFs, created the best some of the best color scans in our testing.

The VuPoint Solutions Magic Wand was the worst performer in this metric. It produces good text when it works well, but it is so easy to nudge a document out of place when you're scanning, leaving you with an unreadable jumble of distorted lines. It also struggles to accurately reproduce color when scanning color documents.

Speed


Let's face it, nobody likes the process of scanning, so the faster you can get it over with, the better. We scanned a double-sided, 10-page document on each model to test speed and timed how long it took from loading the first page to opening a complete PDF. We then converted these times into page-per-minute (ppm) figures. Generally, models with automatic document feeders were much faster than those that required loading each page individually.


The Fujitsu iX1600 ScanSnap is the fastest model we tested. It blew through our 10-page duplex document in seconds. This speed was largely aided by its automatic document feeder, which can handle up to 50 pages, allowing you to buzz through larger documents, very quickly.

The Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed was just slightly behind its sibling. Its page-per-minute figure of 21 is a bit behind its sibling's speed, but it has a more substantial, 80-page automatic document feeder. This would allow you to blitz through an 80-page document in just under 4 minutes, a feat that would require slowing down to reload the document feeder of the iX1600. This capability earned the Fi-7160 Sheetfed our nod for the best high-volume scanning device.

The Fujitsu Fi-7160 has an 80-page automatic document feeder, the...
The Fujitsu Fi-7160 has an 80-page automatic document feeder, the largest capacity of all the models in this review.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

With a speed of 14 pages per minute, the Epson WorkForce ES-400 falls just behind the top performers. It also has a 50-page automatic document feeder to handle large stacks of paper in a single bound. Posting a speed of 13 pages per minute, the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300i was just behind the Epson. However, it only has a 10-page automatic document feeder, making it less suitable for longer documents.

The Brother DS-640 requires that you manually feed each individual page. It also lacks duplex scanning, meaning double-sided pages must be fed twice. Because of this, it took us two and a half minutes to digitize five double-sided pages. This is no big deal if you don't scan all that frequently, but it may be a deal-breaker if you consistently scan longer documents.

Manual feed models like the Brother DS-640 tend to be slower, but...
Manual feed models like the Brother DS-640 tend to be slower, but also much less expensive and more portable.
Credit: Laura Casner

The Scanner Pro App requires that you place each page you want to scan onto a monochrome surface, frame it within the camera on your phone, and snap a picture. This takes more time than feeding a piece of paper into a machine, but with that said, we were quite surprised by how quickly the app could scan a document. The app can automatically recognize the edges of the paper (as long as the lighting is okay), so you don't have to fuss too much about framing the image perfectly. This allowed us to scan three double-sided pages in a minute.

Though we love the Scanner Pro App, taking photos of every page gets...
Though we love the Scanner Pro App, taking photos of every page gets tiresome if you're scanning a long document.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

We weren't even able to calculate a pager per minute figure for the VuPoint Solutions Magic Wand in our testing. Since you have to pull the wand across the page in a perfectly even manner, scanning speed is entirely dependent upon your fine motor skills and focus. Even while taking our time with this model, most of our scans ended up with weird, wavy distortions. Trying to go fast is just a recipe for unusable or unreadable scans.

Flatbed Speed


Since all of the flatbeds we tested are geared for photo scanning, they take much longer to scan text pages than their document-oriented counterparts. Scan times were somewhat variable, but on average, the Epson V600 took 40 seconds to scan a single text page, while the Epson V39 was slightly faster at around 30 seconds. Neither of these models would be up to the task of scanning long documents.

Software


A device's software can easily make or break your scanning experience. Ideally, you want software that makes installation simple, offers intuitive file management, and can make scanned documents text-searchable using Optical Character Recognition (OCR). We installed all of our scanners' software packages onto multiple Mac and PCs, managed thousands of files with each OS, and objectively rated OCR accuracy to find the best software of the bunch.


Somewhat surprisingly, we were most impressed with the software suite offered by the simple Scanner Pro App. It spits out PDF files that you can easily manage within your phone's native file system and transferred directly into an email or text messages or saved to cloud services like Google Drive. It also has optical character recognition that we found to be around 95% accurate. Finally, you can change all of its various options via a familiar, mobile touch screen interface, which is much easier than sifting through the PC-based software packages of the other models we reviewed.

Three of our top award winners include good software packages.
Three of our top award winners include good software packages.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Thanks to nearly flawless optical character recognition, the Brother DS-640 also ranked highly in our software tests. The OCR is backed up with easy installation, operation, and file management, whether using PC or Mac.

A number of models and their associated software fell into the good but not great range when our tests were said and done. The Fujitsu iX1600 ScanSnap and the ScanSnap S1300i offer easy installation and file management. They also provide decent optical character recognition. The OCR did miss some words in our testing, but never to the extent that it kept us from finding a document by searching for a keyword or phrase. The Epson WorkForce ES-400's file management system isn't quite as intuitive as the Fujitsu's, but it gets the job done. The option for turning OCR on is also somewhat hidden, but it is significantly more accurate than the OCR on the Fujitsu models once you get it working.

With relatively painless installation and file management, the Fujitsu Fi-7160 offered a balanced performance in this metric, though it's not quite as intuitive as some other models. The OCR was accurate enough to find a document using a keyword search, but you might miss some occasional phrases within the document.

On top of good speed and a large capacity, the Fujitsu Fi-7160 comes...
On top of good speed and a large capacity, the Fujitsu Fi-7160 comes with well-designed software.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

The Epson Perfection V600 also earned average scores for its included software. We feel like we spent more time than necessary wading through clunky menus before getting the scan settings we wanted. The software also did not seem to run well on any of our Mac devices, often freezing or crashing. The Epson Perfection V39 has very similar software, with a couple of extra features, like the ability to automatically recognize that you're scanning two photos at once and creating two separate files.

Unfortunately, the VuPoint Solutions Magic Wand's software does not make up for the shortcomings of the wand itself. Without any sort of OCR, the resulting scans are not text searchable (something even the inexpensive Scanner Pro App can accomplish), and we found it a bit difficult to select the folder in which to save the scans.

User Friendliness


Initial setup, including unboxing, calibrating, and getting a scanner to communicate to its associated software, can either be a simple and straightforward task or one so frustrating that it makes even the slickest model not worth buying. Additionally, small touches like how easy it is to load and unload paper and a clean user interface can make a model feel user-friendly or like it's been sent to turn your office chores into a never-ending purgatory. We connected each of our models with multiple different devices. We spent hours scanning various documents, receipts, ID cards, and more to uncover all the little annoyances that might leave you wishing you'd bought a different model.


Luckily, most of our models were relatively easy to use, with multiple models sharing the top ranking. These models had some minor annoyances, but they provided a good user experience. The Fujitsu iX1600 ScanSnap only took us 10 minutes to get up and running, including a firmaware update, and it was easy to get it communicating with both Mac and PC devices. The automatic document feeder is easy to load, and the single button interface keeps everything simple. Finally, the relatively large touchscreen controls provide a much more intuitive interface than any other models we tested.

In just 10 minutes, we had the Epson WorkForce ES-400 up and running, and installation was straightforward on both Macs and PCs. The interface is a bit more complicated, but it has a nice autodetect feature that can tell when a document is not a standard size and adjust the settings accordingly.

The Fujitsu Fi-7160 offers a great user experience. However, getting its software installed on a PC can sometimes be a bit of a pain, and Mac users will have to look for third-party software. These small installation hurdles hurt its overall user-friendliness score.

Most models have very simple and clear interfaces, like the Fujitsu...
Most models have very simple and clear interfaces, like the Fujitsu Fi-7160 Sheetfed pictured here.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Both the Epson V600 and V39 flatbed models have easy to understand controls and talk to both Macs and PCs without any fuss. However, they do lack some of the convenient features of the document-oriented models, namely an automatic document feeder, which can make scanning long text documents quite cumbersome.

Both of the flatbed models we tested have similarly sized scanning...
Both of the flatbed models we tested have similarly sized scanning beds.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Two models fell into the average category in our user friendliness testing. We set the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300i up quickly in 15 minutes, but it has no collection tray. This saves desk space, but we were amazed at how much paper managed to slide off the desk while we used this machine. The Brother DS-640 performed similarly with an easy setup, but its similar lack of a collection tray annoyed us much more than we would have anticipated.

A good document feeder and paper tray, like on the Fujitsu ScanSnap...
The slim and portable Brother DS-640 offers a generally good overall...

Again, the worst performer in the metric was the VuPoint Magic Wand. While its general setup and use aren't very complicated, the task of keeping the wand exactly level while gliding it over the pages you want to scan is almost comically difficult. As a result, more than 80% of the scans we created had disorienting waves in them that made reading particular words quite tricky.

Conclusion


They may not be the most exciting devices, but the right scanner can improve organization in your life, help preserve memories, and even increase productivity. Even if your job doesn't explicitly require one, having a quick and easy way to digitize documents, photos, and receipts can keep things tidy, permanently preserved, and more organized. We hope that our detailed testing results will help you choose the model that is best for your home or small office needs.

Michelle Powell and Benjamin Hickok