Best Overall Shredder
AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut
: Micro-Cut | Sheets per Minute
If you tend to shred more than 10 pages at a time, and want those pages to be as difficult to reconstruct as possible, the AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut is your best bet. Despite reliably shredding everything into indecipherable, micro-cut sized confetti, this paper shredder is still able to tear through 72 pages per minute. It backs up that speed and security with impressive power. This machine was nearly impossible to jam in our testing. It gobbled up CDs, credit cards, staples, and paper clips without skipping a beat.
We only had very minor complaints about the AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut. The first being the window on its bin, which is quite small. This makes it easy to overfill the bin without noticing, which can then result in a mess when you do remember to empty it. Overall, this shredder reaches a near perfect balance of security, speed, and power, all at a relatively reasonable price.
Read review: AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut
Best Bang for the Buck
AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut
: Micro-Cut | Sheets per Minute
Slow and loud
Can't shred CDs
Offering high-level security at a relatively low price, the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cutis a great choice for those that want the convenience of a shred-at-home option, but don't need an expensive, high-capacity machine. In our testing, this machine reliably turned 6-sheet stacks of paper into indecipherable, micro-cut sized bits, quite an impressive feat at this price point. It also made quick work of credit cards, one item that we've found to really benefit from the additional security of micro-cut.
The most obvious downsides of this machine are its speed (it maxed out at 42 sheets/minute in our testing, one of the slowest marks) and its noise (it creates a fairly high-pitched squeal when in use). However, neither of these things are of much consequence unless you shred dozens of pages every day. A bigger knock against this machine, in our opinion, is its inability to shred CDs. If you're looking for an inexpensive micro-cut option that can handle these heartier items the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C is an excellent choice, but it has a habit of going in and out of stock at many online retailers.
Read review: AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut
Best Shredder for High Volume Shredding
Fellowes Powershred 99Ci
: Cross-Cut | Sheets per Minute
If you're currently staring at boxes of files that all need to be shredded, the Fellowes PowerShred 99Ci can make fast work of them. In our testing it clocked an incredible speed of 180 pages per minute (that means you can shred every page of War and Peace in under 7 minutes, we calculated it). It also readily gobbled up everything we threw t it, from thick envelopes to CDs and credit cards. Despite that power the PowerShred was one of the quietest models we tested (your cubicle mates will certainly notice it, but they likely won't want to strangle you).
Obviously the cross-cut blades of the PowerShred produce slightly larger shreds than micro-cut blades. However, cross-cut still offers a very high level of security, and disposing of lots of shreds at once makes it even more unlikely any opportunistic thieves will be able to piece and information back together. The biggest strike against the PowerShred is its price. Listing for nearly double what most models cost, it is quite an investment. If you're consistently shredding 100+ page documents, however, the time savings will be well worth the extra cost.
Read review: Fellowes Powershred 99Ci
Great for Occasional Use, and Doesn't Take Up Space
Aurora AS420C Desktop
: Cross-Cut | Sheets per Minute
Small and compact
Not particularly powerful
If you've managed to keep your paper documents to the bare minimum, but still want a convenient way to dispose of the few sensitive pages that end up on your desk, the Aurora AS420C Desktop is a great choice. This tiny, no frills shredder is powerful enough to shred a few pages or even a credit card, yet is small enough that it can inconspicuously live on a shelf or corner of your desk until it is needed. The noise it makes is also surprisingly innocuous and lacks that over the top, high-pitched whine you might expect from a smaller machine.
This machine clearly isn't meant for heavy use. Long documents or frequent shredding would certainly warrant a larger unit, as frequent use is going to stress the tiny motor in this machine. But if you don't want to sacrifice too much office real estate to a shredder and only need to shred a few pages a week, this could be the perfect solution.
Why You Should Trust Us
Max Mutter and Steven Tata have been leading TechGearLab's office product testing since 2016. That has put their hands on well over 100 small and home office related products, from printers and shredders to Chromebooks and office chairs, not to mention shredders. The unique experience of testing small office products while working in a small office grants Max and Steven a clear perspective of what most offices need, and how those needs can best be met. They've also looked at every office product they've tested through the lens of a home user, and thus are quite familiar with that landscape as well.
In completing this review we shredded over 5000 pages of documents (don't' worry, all were recycled) ranging from standard 8" x 11" sheets to stuffed junk-mail envelopes to credit cards. In doing so we evaluated each model's shredding quality and speed, the ease of emptying the wastebasket, and the relative annoyingness of the shrieks associated with documents meeting their doom. We also thouroughly researched and evaluated such important shredder-related question as, "How much more secure is micro-cut than cross-cut?" and, "When is it worth buying a shredding service?" In the end we found the best shredder for every application, from home users that only shred a few pages a month, to ofices that need to dispose of hundreds of sensitive pages at a time, and everything in between.
Analysis and Test Results
With all of the new and sophisticated ways that our personal information can be compromised digitally, it is easy to forget that information still exists on physical sheets of paper that can be stolen the old fashioned way. In fact, there is no law against searching through trash that has been left outside a home to be collected (see 1988 case of California vs. Greenwood). So if you have any documents that could help a potential identity thief, getting a good paper shredder is a worthwhile investment.
Here we display each model's overall performance in our slew of tests compared to its list price. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut, in our opinion, offers the best balance of price and performance, providing top-notch capability with a fairly average price. If you're looking for a budget option, both the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut and the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut offer good performance and great security at impressively low prices.
While cross-cut models offer a high level of security, they can retain usable information if you're unlucky (right). There is almost no chance of a micro-cut model (left) retaining usable information.
Shredding quality boils down to 3 things: security, reliability, and convenience. Security relates to the size of the shreds produced, generally either cross-cut or micro-cut. Cross-cut level security makes reconstructing documents nearly impossible and offers plenty of security for most people, while micro-cut level security makes documents essentially impossible to decipher. Reliability refers to a shredder's ability to consistently shred stacks of paper at its advertised capacity. For example, if a 10-sheet model isn't reliable enough to consistently shred stacks of 10-pages you can easily end up with readable chunks of documents in your waste bin. Convenience refers to the ability to shred odd items, like credit cards and junk mail envelopes, without any extra fuss or consideration. We shredded hundreds of items on all of our shredders and meticulously evaluated the resulting confetti to assess overall shredding quality.
All of the models we tested were able to shred effectively, so there were no scores lower than 4 in this metric. However, there were significant performance differences between models. Far and away the best contestant in our sensational shredding showdown was the AmazonBasics 12-sheet Micro-Cut, which earned the top score of 9. It handled its advertised maximum capacity of 12 sheets without emitting a so much as a squeak of protest. It also ate up full envelopes of junk mail, CD's, and credit cards with ease. To boot it does all this with the added security of micro-cut.
The Fellowes Powershred 99Ciearned an 8 out of 10 in our shredding quality testing. It was by far the most powerful model we tested, easily tackling its advertised capacity of 18-sheets and gobbling up everything from CDs to large junk mail envelopes. The only mark against it is the fact that it uses cross-cut blades rather than micro-cut. The AmazonBasics 24-Sheet was similarly powerful, able to tear through a stack of 26 sheets at a clip. It also has cross-cut blades, which prevented it from earning a top score.
The Royal HD1400MX and the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut both scored a 7. The Royal HD1400MX was usually able to handle its advertised 14 sheet capacity with aplomb, but we did run into one instance where it struggled and jammed. This, and the fact that it is a cross-cut model rather than a micro-cut is the only reason it lost points in this metric. Otherwise it swallowed junk mail and other odd items with no issue, and user reviews indicate that it has long-term reliability and durability. The Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut scored highly in this metric mostly because of the added security of its micro-cutting blades. Apart from this it was a fairly mediocre performer. It was able to handle its advertised capacity of 8 sheets but emitted a noise reminiscent of a dying weasel when doing so. Thick junk mail envelopes often caused issues as well. It utilizes a second set of blades just for shredding CD's, which are cut into three pieces. This is plenty secure unless you happen to have nuclear launch codes on your CD's, but it is both less satisfying and inspires less confidence than seeing a CD ripped into tiny bits.
The resulting paper shreds from all of the models we tested. There is a clear difference between the micro-cut and cross-cut models.
Closely following the group of top scorers were the Fellowes Powershred 79Ci, the Fellowes Powershred 73Ci, and the AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut, all of which scored 6. Besides having the best name of the bunch, the Powershred 79Ci was able to easily burn through junk mail envelopes and CD's and has great user reviews, indicating a high level of durability. It lost points because of the relatively decreased security of cross-cut and the fact that it jammed when loaded with its advertised capacity of 16 sheets. It did just fine with 14 sheets, but those loading it up to its advertised capacity would have to deal with jams or decreased shredding quality. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut was able to handle its advertised capacity of 12 sheets, but the motor did sound like it required some effort to do so. Otherwise it ripped through most items with ease, making fast work of junk mail and credit cards. The Powershred 73Ci handled its advertised capacity of 12-sheets easily and was able to handle thick junk mail envelopes, though the motor did sound like it was struggling on occasion. It also offers cross-cut level security.
If overloaded, paper will often make it through the shredding slot without jamming, but will end up as easily readable shredded paper waffles. This is why accurately reported maximum shredding capacities are crucial.
Two different models scored a 5 in our shredding quality testing the first of which was the Fellowes Powershred 60Cs. This cross-cut model was able to shred its advertised capacity of 10 sheets, but groaned and moaned a bit while doing so. In general the Powershred 60Cs was not particularly burly, it struggled with thick envelopes and other odd items, and is only rated to shred credit cards, not CD's. The second model to score a 5 was the Bonsaii EverShred C169-B. This model was able to handle odd stock like thick envelopes and CDs with ease. It lost points due to the decreased security of cross-cut when compared to micro-cut, and the fact that its advertised capacity and the capacity we observed were significantly different. While the EverShred C169-B claims a 14 sheet capacity, we could only ever get it to effectively shred 10. This sets up the possibility of creating wads of partially shredded paper if you shred at the advertised capacity, which are barely more secure than not shredding at all.
Micro-cut models reduce credit cards illegible to bits, but we found it is possible to reconstruct a credit card that has gone through a cross-cut model.
As cathartic as it is to watch clean paper get shredded into tiny little bits, it's not something you're going to want to spend hours doing. Any paper shredder can handle small jobs of 10 or fewer pages with expediency, but if your job or financial strategy routinely pushes your shredding jobs into triple digit page numbers, your life can definitely be improved with a faster shredder. To test speed we prepped many stacks of paper that matched each model's highest page capacity in size, and fed as many through each shredder as we could in a single minute.
The fastest of the bunch was the Fellowes Powershred 99Ci, which scored a perfect 10 out of 10 in our speed testing. It managed to conquer 180 pages per minute in our testing without even uttering a single moan. The Powershred 79Ci was slightly behind its sibling. Even though we found its maximum capacity to be exaggerated, it was still able to clock an astonishing speed of 140 sheets per minute when shredding at our observed maximum capacity. This was nearly double the speed of the next closest competitor and put it well ahead of most of the competition. The AmazonBasics 24-Sheet clocked 114 sheets a minute, still plenty fast for the vast majority of people. The Fellowes PowerShred 73Ci posted 109 pages per minute.
Coming in a distant third to the Powershred models were three models that all scored a 7. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut logged a pace of 72 sheets per minute in this test. Although much slower than the top scorers, it is impressive when you consider that it shreds into much tinier pieces. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut also earned a 7, and matched its micro-cut sibling's speed of 72 sheets per minute. Just behind these models was the Bonsaii EverShred C169-B, which tore through paper at 70 sheets per minute. The Fellowes Powershred 60Cs was quick, but not as quick as its big brother. It logged a speed of 67 sheets per minute in our test.
The Royal 1400MX just missed out on being in the group of high scorers. It earned a 6, and was just slightly slower at 55 sheets per minute. The two bottom scorers, however, were well separated from the rest of the pack. The Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut scored a 4 with a relatively slow speed of 44 sheets per minute. This is just slightly better than half the speed of most of the high scorers and is just a bit more than a quarter the speed of the top scorer. This sacrifice in speed is most likely due to the DocShred offering the advanced security of micro-cut at a low price.
Ease of Use
While paper shredders are generally simple machines that don't present too many difficulties beyond the occasional jam, there are certain user-friendly features that can make your experience a bit more streamlined. Most of these things have to do with the bin. Larger bins don't have to be emptied as often, the ability to slide a bin out without having to lift up the shredding unit makes emptying easier, and clear indicators of when the bin is full can prevent the dreaded confetti avalanche associated with trying to empty an overstuffed bin. Safety features like finger guards to prevent children or pets from getting anywhere near the blades can offer peace of mind. Most of these machines have very similar, intuitive interfaces, but some models are slightly better designed than others. After shredding thousands of pages for our testing (don't worry, we recycle) we were able to closely evaluate every one of these features.
The most user friendly model we tested was the Fellowes Powershred 79Ci, which scored an 8 in the ease of use metric. It has a couple of added features that are by no means necessary, but are certainly nice, like a sensor that shuts the machine down when a finger gets close to the slot, and a plastic guard for shredding stiff items like CDs to ensure no shrapnel flies out of the device. The clear full indicator ensures you'll know to empty the bin before it becomes a primed avalanche of paper shreds. The 6-gallon bin pulls out from the font and was the easiest to remove of any model. It's sibling, the Fellowes Powershred 73Ci functions very similarly and also earned a score of 8 out of 10.
Just outside of the top slot were two models that both scored a 7. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut boasts a simple, intuitive interface and an easy to remove, drawer style, 6.7-gallon bin. It missed out on the top spot because its only full indicator is a small window on the front of the bin. This meant our testers often unknowingly over loaded it, resulting in confetti snowstorms during the emptying process. The Royal HD1400MX also scored a 7. Like the AmazonBasics Micro-Cut it has a nice interface and an easy to remove, drawer style, 6.2-gallon bin. However, it has no full indicator, meaning you have to periodically check the bin to avoid overloading it. This inconvenience knocked it out of the top spot.
The woes of trying to empty an overloaded bin.
Most models fell into the midrange in our ease of use testing, with six different models earning a score of 6 out of 10. These models were neither annoying to use, nor did they offer anything that made them feel especially user-friendly. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut has almost an identical interface to its smaller sibling, but its bin is slightly bigger (4.8 gallons) and it includes a CD shredding slot. The Fellowes Powershred 60Cs has the same safety sensor as the 79Ci, and a slightly dumbed down version of its interface. It also has a shredding unit that sits on top of a 6-gallon bin. The shredding unit is quite heavy and requires two hands to move around. The Powershred 99Ci has the same safety sensor and a very large 9-gallon pullout bin. However, its sheer size makes it a bit difficult to move around. The AmazonBasics 24-Sheet has a nice interface and is easy to empty, but it is very large and takes up a lot of space.
Continuing down the list of models that scored a 6 in our ease of use testing, the Bonsaii EverShred C169-B has simple controls and a drawer-style bin that is easy to remove. However, the bin is relatively small at 4.5 gallons and has only a small window at the front as a fill indicator. The final model to score a 6 in our ease of use testing was the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut. It has a balance on top of the shredding unit that must be removed to empty the 5.5-gallon bin, but it includes a built-in handle that makes this easy to do with one hand. It also includes a window on the front of the bin to gauge how full it is. A separate shredding slot is used just for CDs, which saves the main blades if you shred a lot of CDs.
The AmazonBasics model (left) uses a simple, single switch control. The Fellowes model (right) includes a number of different warning lights, a guard for shredded CDs, and an auto shutoff feature.
Most of the models we tested scored between 6 and 8 in our ease of use testing, meaning none of them were particularly annoying or unpleasant. The main differentiating factors for ease of use were user interface, ease of emptying, and safety features.
Let's get this out of the way: no shredder is quite. Lots of tiny blades tearing through paper with the help of a whirring motor is inevitably going to create a cacophony that no one wants to hear. However, some models do manage to keep the noise to a less grating, lower pitched hum instead of a nails-on-chalkboard style shriek. We recorded each model shredding both small batches as well as motor-stressing large loads, then listened to those recordings side-by-side to discover which models are least likely to anger your officemates.
As we said before, no shredder sounds pleasant, but the Powershred 99Ci comes close. Its low pitched hum is noticeable but not terribly grating, making it the least offensive of the bunch. The Fellowes Powershred 79Ci earned a 9 out of 10 in this metric. It had a fairly low pitched, consistent hum that could almost fade into the background. The AmazonBasics 24-Sheet had a similarly low hum that wasn't too grating on the ears. It also scored a 9 out of 10. The Fellowes Powershred 79Ci was closest to the top scores with a 7 out of 10. It keeps the noise fairly low, but with some higher pitched crackling noises thrown in.
Next up is the AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut which earned a 6. The AmazonBasics had a fairly low pitch, but with some higher pitched crinkling noise mixed in, which made it a tad more annoying. The Fellowes 73Ci also earned a 6 out of 10. It also produced a low hum but with some noticeable crinkling paper accents thrown into the mix.
There were two models that scored a 5. The Royal HD1400MX had a more bearable low pitched tone, but with some very loud accents of crinkling that start to fray the nerves after a while. The Bonsaii EverShred C169-B was very similar with a lower frequency interspersed with more frazzling crinkling noises.
All of the models at the bottom of the noise testing barrel ended up there because of grating, high pitched frequencies. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut's motor produced almost identically grating sounds, and thus received the same score. However, these models weren't wasn't quite as bad as the two bottom scorers. Both the Fellowes Powershred 60Cs and the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut scored a 3 in the noise metric. Both had similar, high pitched shrieks that would probably require earplugs or some serious Zen meditation for any shred sessions lasting more than a few minutes.
Different people will naturally require different levels of security and different amounts of capacity in their shredders. We hope our testing results have narrowed the field and helped you find the perfect paper shredder for your needs and budget.