The Best Paper Shredders of 2018

Want to securely scrap sensitive documents? We bought 10 of the top paper shredders available and put them through a gauntlet of side-by-side tests to help you find the best one. With so many models available it can be difficult to choose the right one for your needs. Our tests assessed shredding quality, speed, ease of use, and noise. We shredded thousands of documents and dozens of credit cards and CDs to find the most robust shredders. Whether you want to dispose of the occasional sensitive document or shred hundreds of pages a day our review can help you find the best shredder for your needs.

Read the full review below ≫

Test Results and Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 10 ≪ Previous | View All | Next ≫
Rank #1 #3 #5 #2 #7
Product
Fellowes Powershred 99Ci
Fellowes Powershred 79Ci
Bonsaii EverShred C169-B
AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut
Fellowes Powershred 60Cs
Awards  Top Pick Award      Editors' Choice Award   
Price $270 List
$186.88 at Amazon
$240 List
$166.20 at Amazon
$151 List
$106.97 at Amazon
$100 List
$99.99 at Amazon
$100 List
$89.99 at Amazon
Overall Score
100
0
85
100
0
75
100
0
59
100
0
77
100
0
57
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Fast, powerful, relatively quietIncredibly fast, high capacityReasonable speedHigh security, powerful, reasonably fastRelatively fast
Cons Expensive, largeExpensiveSmall bin, exaggerated capacitySmall bin windowExpensive in relation to its performance, loud
Ratings by Category Powershred 99Ci Powershred 79Ci EverShred C169-B Basics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut Powershred 60Cs
Shredding Quality - 40%
10
0
8
10
0
6
10
0
5
10
0
9
10
0
5
Speed - 35%  
10
0
10
10
0
9
10
0
7
10
0
7
10
0
7
Ease Of Use - 15%
10
0
6
10
0
8
10
0
6
10
0
7
10
0
6
Noise - 10%
10
0
9
10
0
7
10
0
5
10
0
6
10
0
3
Specs Powershred 99Ci Powershred 79Ci EverShred C169-B Basics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut Powershred 60Cs
Bin Capacity 9 gallon 6 gallons 4.5 gallons 6.7 gallons 6 gallons
Advertised Sheet Capacity 18 16 14 12 10
Measured Sheet Capacity 18 14 10 12 10

Analysis and Award Winners


Review by:
Max Mutter and Steven Tata

Last Updated:
Tuesday
January 23, 2018

Share:
Updated January 2018
We haven't seen any interesting new models enter the market in the last month, but AmazonBasics did discontinue its 12-Sheet Cross-Cut model, which left one of our Best Buy Awards up for the taking. This award moved over to the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut. While it doesn't have as large a capacity as its now defunct sibling, the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut still does a great job of disposing of the occasional document, and only sets you back $30.

Best Overall Shredder


AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut


Editors' Choice Award

$99.99
at Amazon
See It

High security
Powerful
Reasonably fast
Small bin window
The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut performed impressively well in our review and is the best shredder for most people who regularly shred documents. With a relatively low list price of $100, it offers micro-cut security and a 72 page per minute capacity. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut was almost impossible to jam in normal use and tore through thick junk mail envelopes, staples, CDs, and credit cards. Its large pull-out bin was easy to empty and took us a while to fill. For those seeking maximum security and robust shredding at a reasonable cost, this is the best shredder out there for you.

Read review: AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut

Best Bang for the Buck: Cross-Cut


AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut


Best Buy Award

$29.99
at Amazon
See It

Inexpensive
Lightweight
Small
Lacks some power
Small capacity bin
Many people's sensitive document disposal is limited to a few pages here and there. If you fit into this category, the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut is the perfect way to turn those sensitive documents into confetti before they end up out on the curb. For just $30 you get a machine that can reliably tear through your documents at a decent clip when you need it to, and that is small enough to hide away when you don't. If you're debating whether or not it's worth getting a shredder for your home, this is a model worth considering.

Read review: AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut

Best Bang for the Buck: Micro-Cut


Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut


Best Buy Award

$52.77
at Amazon
See It

High security
Inexpensive
Slow
Loud
Though it wasn't a top performer in our testing, the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut does provide the advanced security of micro-cut at a bargain price. This makes it a great choice for those that want high security, but don't tend to shred more than a few pages at a time. We like the Bonsaii better than the slightly less expensive AmaconBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut because the Bonsaii is much better at shredding credit cards, a task where we found that the extra security of micro-cut really comes in handy.

Read review: Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut

Best Shredder for High Volume Shredding


Fellowes Powershred 99Ci


Top Pick Award

$186.88
at Amazon
See It

Fast
Powerful
Relatively quiet
Expensive
Large
If your job requires you to dispose of 100+ page documents regularly, the Fellowes PowerShred 99Ci will be your new best friend. In our testing it was able to easily turn 180 pages per minute into indecipherable confetti, making it far and away the fastest model we tested. It also did this while never uttering an annoying sound, whereas almost every other shredder we tested had us reaching for earplugs. All this power and speed does require a higher price and a much larger body. The 99Ci requires more space than most shredders, and may not fit under a desk. However, if you're staring at stacks of paper that need to be ripped to pieces, the extra size and cost are well worth it.

Read review: Fellowes Powershred 99Ci

select up to 5 products
Score Product Price Our Take
85
$270
Top Pick Award
Expensive, but well worth the time savings for those that shred a lot
77
$100
Editors' Choice Award
Fast, powerful, and offers the increased security of micro-cut, you can't ask for much more
75
$240
If your shredding jobs reach triple digit page numbers, this machine will make your life a lot easier
65
$200
Shreds well but is fairly slow for a high capacity model
59
$151
Performs reasonably well, but is quite expensive for a low capacity model
58
$30
Best Buy Award
Great and inexpensive option for occasional shredding jobs, but doesn't have the power for larger jobs
57
$100
Somewhat noisy, and there are more capable models available at the same price
54
$55
Best Buy Award
Great if you only shred the occasional document, but want the highest security standard
51
$50
As long as you don't shred large stacks of documents and don't need to shred CDs, this this model will serve you well
39
$500
Automatic feeder often jams, making this model not worth its high price tag


Analysis and Test Results


With all of the new and sophisticated ways that our personal information can be compromised digitally, it is easy to forget that information still exists on physical sheets of paper that can be stolen the old fashioned way. In fact, there is no law against searching through trash that has been left outside a home to be collected (see 1988 case of California vs. Greenwood). So if you have any documents that could help a potential identity thief, getting a good paper shredder is a worthwhile investment.

Our overall scores are based on a number of different tests. The majority of our testing was focused on how well each one of our models shredded. We also evaluated how quickly they shredded, how loud they were, and how easy they were to use. The sections that follow detail how all of the models performed in those individual tests.

While cross-cut models offer a high level of security  they can retain usable information if you're unlucky (right). There is almost no chance of a micro-cut model (left) retaining usable information.
While cross-cut models offer a high level of security, they can retain usable information if you're unlucky (right). There is almost no chance of a micro-cut model (left) retaining usable information.

Shredding Quality


When considering shredding quality the factor we weighted most heavily was security, as this is the sole reason for purchasing a shredder. This essentially resulted in the micro-cut models getting a significant bump up in our scoring compared to the cross-cut models. We also tested how well each model performed common tasks like shredding standard junk mail and other items, such as CD's and credit cards. To assess robustness we shoved paper into each model for 15 continuous minutes, observing how easy they were to jam and whether they struggled at all with that kind of volume. None of the models we tested overheated during this test, meaning they will all be able to handle the standard workloads of a home user or small office. We also scoured user reviews to determine whether there were any prevalent durability or manufacturing flaws. Finally, we tested each model's shredding capacity. We did not rate shredding capacity in absolute terms, but rather how close each model was able to come to its advertised shredding capacity. We found that exceeding a model's shredding capacity produced shredded paper waffles that retained legible characters and could not be fed back into the machines, meaning you would have to tediously shred them by hand. Thus we felt having an accurately advertised shredding capacity was more important for shred quality than being able to shred more sheets at once. Models with higher capacities do tend to be able to shred faster, and those models gained points in our speed metric. For more on shredding capacity see our buying advice article.


All of the models we tested were able shred effectively, so there were no scores lower than 4 in this metric. However, there were significant performance differences between models. Far and away the best contestant in our sensational shredding showdown was the AmazonBasics 12-sheet Micro-Cut, which earned the top score of 9. It handled its advertised maximum capacity of 12 sheets without emitting a so much as a squeak of protest. It also ate up full envelopes of junk mail, CD's, and credit cards with ease. To boot it does all this with the added security of micro-cut.


The Fellowes Powershred 99Ciearned an 8 out of 10 in our shredding quality testing. It was by far the most powerful model we tested, easily tackling its advertised capacity of 18-sheets and gobbling up everything from CD's to large junk mail envelopes. The only mark against it is the fact that it uses cross-cut blades rather than micro-cut.

The Royal HD1400MX and the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut both scored a 7. The Royal HD1400MX was usually able to handle its advertised 14 sheet capacity with aplomb, but we did run into one instance where it struggled and jammed. This, and the fact that it is a cross-cut model rather than a micro-cut, is the only reason it lost points in this metric. Otherwise it swallowed junk mail and other odd items with no issue, and user reviews indicate that it has long term reliability and durability. The Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut scored highly in this metric mostly because of the added security of its micro-cutting blades. Apart from this it was a fairly mediocre performer. It was able to handle its advertised capacity of 8 sheets, but emitted a noise reminiscent of a dying weasel when doing so. Thick junk mail envelopes often caused issues as well. It utilizes a second set of blades just for shredding CD's, which are cut into three pieces. This is plenty secure unless you happen to have nuclear launch codes on your CD's, but it is both less satisfying and inspires less confidence than seeing a CD ripped into tiny bits.

The resulting paper shreds from all of the models we tested. There is a clear difference between the micro-cut and cross-cut models.
The resulting paper shreds from all of the models we tested. There is a clear difference between the micro-cut and cross-cut models.

Closely following the group of top scorers were the Fellowes Powershred 79Ci and the AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut, and the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut, all of which scored 6. Besides having the best name of the bunch, the Powershred 79Ci was able to easily burn through junk mail envelopes and CD's and has great user reviews, indicating a high level of durability. It lost points because of the relatively decreased security of cross-cut and the fact that it jammed when loaded with its advertised capacity of 16 sheets. It did just fine with 14 sheets, but those loading it up to its advertised capacity would have to deal with jams or decreased shredding quality. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut was able to handle it advertised capacity of 12 sheets, but the motor did sound like it required some effort to do so. Otherwise it ripped through most items with ease, making fast work of junk mail and credit cards. The AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut provides great security, but its relatively low shredding capacity caused it to have trouble with things like thick envelopes and paper clips. It is also not able to shred CDs.

If overloaded  paper will often make it through the shredding slot without jamming  but will end up as easily readable shredded paper waffles. This is why accurately reported maximum shredding capacities are crucial.
If overloaded, paper will often make it through the shredding slot without jamming, but will end up as easily readable shredded paper waffles. This is why accurately reported maximum shredding capacities are crucial.

Three separate models scored a 5 in our shredding quality testing, the first of which was the AmazonBasics 6-sheet Cross-Cut. Like its big brother it easily shredded through its advertised capacity of 6 sheets. However, it easily jams when inserting junk mail envelopes and, while it can handle credit cards, it is not robust enough to shred CD's. Also in the 5 score club was the Fellowes Powershred 60Cs. This cross-cut model was able to shred its advertised capacity of 10 sheets, but groaned and moaned a bit while doing so. In general the Powershred 60Cs was not particularly burly, it struggled with thick envelopes and other odd items, and is only rated to shred credit cards, not CD's. The final model to score a 5 was the Bonsaii EverShred C169-B. This model was able to handle odd stock like thick envelopes and CD's with ease. It lost points due to the decreased security of cross-cut when compared to micro-cut, and the fact that its advertised capacity and the capacity we observed were significantly different. While the EverShred C169-B claims a 14 sheet capacity, we could only ever get it to effectively shred 10. This sets up the possibility of creating wads of partially shredded paper if you shred at the advertised capacity, which are barely more secure than not shredding at all.

Micro-cut models reduce credit cards illegible to bits  but we found it is possible to reconstruct a credit card that has gone through a cross-cut model.
Micro-cut models reduce credit cards illegible to bits, but we found it is possible to reconstruct a credit card that has gone through a cross-cut model.

The low scorer in this test was the Swingline Stack-and-Shred 100X, which scored a 4. The Swingline is a 6 sheet shredder that has an automatic feeding tray that can hold up to 100 sheets. We found it was able to handle its advertised capacity both when manually feeding in 6 sheets and when using the document feeder, though the document feeder was slow and had a propensity to jam. The manual feed slot also jammed more easily than any other when loading thick envelopes. It handled credit cards just fine, but is not rated for CD's.

Speed


If your career or financial strategies tend to generate lots of sensitive paperwork, or you like to let your shredding jobs build up and then do them all in one go, greater speed will vastly improve your shredding experience. As cathartic as it is to take nice, clean paper and annihilate it into tiny bits, you probably wouldn't want to spend hours doing so. We tested speed by timing how long each model took to shred its maximum single pass capacity, and then calculating a pages per minute figure from this data. We either used the advertised maximum capacity, if we found the shredder could actually handle it, or our observed maximum capacity if it was lower than the manufacturer's claim. As you get used to your shredder you get a feel for how much material it can handle at once and for grabbing stacks of paper that are roughly that size. Therefore, this test approximates the speed you would experience when completing a large shred job. We also measured speed using smaller stacks of paper, but the results did not differ greatly, and we believe the maximum capacity speed test is the most relevant to real world use.


The fastest of the bunch was the Fellowes Powershred 99Ci, which scored a perfect 10 out of 10 in our speed testing. Itmanaged to conquer 180 pages per minute in our testing wihtout even uttering a single moan. The Pwershred 79Ci was slightly behind it sibling with a score of 9 out of 10. Even though we found its maximum capacity to be exaggerated, it was still able to clock an astonishing speed of 140 sheets per minute when shredding at our observed maximum capacity. This was nearly double the speed of the next closest competitor, and put it well ahead of most of the competition.

Coming in a distant third to the Powershred models were four models that all scored a 7. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut logged a pace of 72 sheets per minute in this test. Although much slower than the top scorers, it is impressive when you consider that it shreds into much tinier pieces. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut also earned a 7, and matched its micro-cut sibling's speed of 72 sheets per minute. Just behind these models was the Bonsaii EverShred C169-B, which tore through paper at 70 sheets per minute. The Fellowes Powershred 60Cs was quick, but not as quick as its big brother. It logged a speed of 67 sheets per minute in our test. The AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut was the final model to score a 7, posting a respectable 60 sheets per minute when shredding at its maximum capacity.


The Royal 1400MX just missed out on being in the group of high scorers. It earned a 6, and was just slightly slower at 55 sheets per minute. The two bottom scorers, however, were well separated from the rest of the pack. The Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut scored a 4 with a relatively slow speed of 44 sheets per minute, and the AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut was right behind clocking a speed of 42 sheets per minute. This is just slightly better than half the speed of most of the high scorers, and is just a bit more than a quarter the speed of the top scorer. This sacrifice in speed is most likely due to the DocShred offering the advanced security of micro-cut at a low price. At the back of the pack, with a score of 3, was the Swingline Stack-and-Shred 100X. It went through 40 sheets per minute when using the manual feed slot. It also includes an automatic feeding tray that can hold a stack of 100 sheets, and then automatically shred them a few at a time. However, we found that this took longer than shredding manually and often jammed or didn't work, so it didn't really offer any advantage in convenience either.

Ease of Use


When shredding, the most significant ease of use related factor is emptying the bin. Some models require you to remove the shredding unit to access and empty the bin. This isn't a huge hassle if you keep your shredding machine in an easily accessible location, but can be a pain if you want to keep it hidden away under your desk. Some models have a drawer style bin that can be pulled out from the front of the unit. This makes them much easier to access and empty, especially if they're tucked away somewhere. However, if models like these don't have a good indicator of when they're full you may end up creating a confetti snowstorm when you pull the drawer out. Bin volume also relates to ease of use as the more paper shreds a bin can hold the less often you'll have to empty it. As these are very simple machines they all have correspondingly simple interfaces, but there are some noticeable differences between models. Throughout the testing process all of our testers used, abused, and emptied every single model in this review, so they had some pretty strong opinions when assigning ease of use scores.


The most user friendly model we tested was the Fellowes Powershred 79Ci, which scored an 8 in the ease of use metric. It has a couple of added features that are by no means necessary, but are certainly nice, like a sensor that shuts the machine down when a finger gets close to the slot, and a plastic guard for shredding stiff items like CDs to ensure no shrapnel flies out of the device. The clear full indicator ensures you'll know to empty the bin before it becomes a primed avalanche of paper shreds. The 6-gallon bin pulls out from the font and was the easiest to remove of any model. Just outside of the top slot were two models that both scored a 7. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut boasts a simple, intuitive interface and an easy to remove, drawer style, 6.7-gallon bin. It missed out on the top spot because its only full indicator is a small window on the front of the bin. This meant our testers often unknowingly over loaded it, resulting in confetti snowstorms during the emptying process. The Royal HD1400MX also scored a 7. Like the AmazonBasics Micro-Cut it has a nice interface and an easy to remove, drawer style, 6.2 gallon bin. However, it has no full indicator, meaning you have to periodically check the bin to avoid overloading it. This inconvenience knocked it out of the top spot.

The woes of trying to empty an overloaded bin.
The woes of trying to empty an overloaded bin.

Most models fell into the midrange in our ease of use testing, with five different models earning a score of 6 out fo 10. These models were neither annoying to use, nor did they offer anything that made them feel especially user friendly. The AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut is a small model that can fit just about anywhere and has a no frills interface with one switch. However, its small 3.8 gallon bin needs to be emptied frequently. Also, the shredding unit sits on top of the bin, meaning it must be lifted off the bin in order to empty it. This can be inconvenient, especially if you want to hide it away under a desk. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut has almost an identical interface to its smaller sibling, but its bin is slightly bigger (4.8 gallons) and it includes a CD shredding slot. The Fellowes Powershred 60Cs has the same safety sensor as the 79Ci, and a slightly dumbed down version of its interface. It also has a shredding unit that sits on on top of a 6-gallon bin. The shredding unit is quite heavy and requires two hands to move around. The Powershred 99Ci has the same safety sensor and a very large 9-gallon pullout bin. However, its sheer size makes it a bit difficult to move around. The AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut also has a fairly simple interface. Its 4.1 gallon bin does need more frequent emptying, but the handle on the shredding unit makes this process a bit easier than with other sit on top style shredders.

Continuing down the list of models that scored a 6 in our ease of use testing, the Bonsaii EverShred C169-B has simple controls and a drawer style bin that is easy to remove. However, the bin is relatively small at 4.5 gallons and has only a small window at the front as a fill indicator. The final model to score a 6 in our ease of use testing was the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut. It has a balance on top shredding unit that must be removed to empty the 5.5 gallon bin, but it includes a built in handle that makes this easy to do with one hand. It also includes a window on the front of the bin to gauge how full it is. A separate shredding slot is used just for CDs, which saves the main blades if you shred a lot of CDs.

The AmazonBasics model (left) uses a simple  single switch control. The Fellowes model (right) includes a number of different warning lights  a guard for shredded CDs  and an auto shutoff feature.
The AmazonBasics model (left) uses a simple, single switch control. The Fellowes model (right) includes a number of different warning lights, a guard for shredded CDs, and an auto shutoff feature.

Most of the models we tested scored between 6 and 8 in our ease of use testing, meaning none of them were particularly annoying or unpleasant. The only model that fell outside of the category was the Swingline Stack-and-Shred 100X, which scored a 4. Other than its bulky and heavy build there was nothing specifically arduous about its day to day use. The interface is understandable enough and the 7-gallon, drawer style bin is fairly easy to empty. However, the clear selling point of this model is the 100 sheet automatic feeding tray, which we found to be so unreliable that it was almost useless. It was constantly jamming or thinking it was done and shutting off when there were still 50 sheets remaining. It certainly didn't live up to its labor free shredding claim, and it lost big points for that.

Noise


Noise was our lowest weighted testing metric. This is because you will probably only use your shredder infrequently and/or in short bursts, so even the noisiest models won't pose a problem for most people. However, if you're especially sensitive to noise, will be shredding in a crowded office situation, or need to hide your latest doughnut binge from your wife by discreetly shredding the receipt, you will want to look for a quieter model. We first tested noise using a decibel meter, but the results weren't very differentiating and didn't correspond to how annoying we thought each model actually sounded. So we ended up scoring each subjectively, based on how bearable/unbearable we found the screeches emanating from each model.


Lets face it, no shredder sounds pleasant, but the Powershred 99Ci comes close. Its low pitched hum is noticabley but not terribly grating, making it the least offenisve of the bunch. The Fellowes Powershred 79Ci earned a 7 out of 10 in this metric. It had a fairly low pitched, consistent hum that could almost fade into the background. Next up were the AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Micro-Cut and the Swingline Stack-and-Shred 100X, both of which earned a 6. The AmazonBasics had a fairly low pitch, but with some higher pitched crinkling noise mixed in, which made it a tad more annoying. The Swingline was also low pitched, but had a choppy, rhythmic sound that was much harder to block out. There were also two models that scored a 5. The Royal HD1400MX had a more bearable low pitched tone, but with some very loud accents of crinkling that start to fray the nerves after a while. The Bonsaii EverShred C169-B was very similar with a lower frequency interspersed with more frazzling crinkling noises.



All of the models at the bottom of the noise testing barrel ended up there because of grating, high pitched frequencies. The AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Cross-Cut scored a 4 in this metric. Its high pitched squeal is bearable, but would get annoying pretty fast, and definitely would not endear you to your officemates. The AmazonBasics 6-Sheet Micro-Cut had a very similar noise, and thus received the same score. The AmazonBasics 12-Sheet Cross-Cut's motor produced almost identically grating sounds, and thus received the same score. However, these models weren't wasn't quite as bad as the two bottom scorers. Both the Fellowes Powershred 60Cs and the Bonsaii DocShred C156-C Micro-Cut scored a 3 in the noise metric. Both had similar, high pitched shrieks that would probably require earplugs or some serious Zen meditation for any shred sessions lasting more than a few minutes.

Conclusion


Security is the sole reason for buying a shredder, so that is the main thing to consider when deciding which model is best for you. Cross-cut provides plenty of security for most people, as it leaves documents almost indecipherable. If you work for something like a law firm and think there may be some very dedicated miscreants searching through your trash, micro-cut ensures your documents will be completely unreadable. After security, you'll want to decide whether you can get away with an inexpensive, low capacity model, or if your shredding habits warrant a larger, bulkier, and faster machine. We hope the information and testing results we provided have guided you to your ideal model.
Max Mutter and Steven Tata

  • Share this article:

Still not sure? Take a look at our buying advice article for more info.
 

Follow Us

Unbiased.

You Might Also Like