Best Overall Home Security Camera
Nest Cam IQ
: 1080p | Power Source
: Standard Outlet
Great video quality
Smooth real-time viewing
Field leading monitoring services available
Great facial recognition
Very limited without a subscription
For those willing to spend a little extra to get the most advanced features available, the Nest Cam IQ is the clear choice. This camera provides the hallmark high-quality video and seamless user interface that have become synonymous with the Nest brand, and employs advanced facial recognition technology to cut down on the number of alerts you get on your phone. Not only can you set the camera to only send you an alert when it sees a person, after a few rounds of learning via user input it can only send you an alert if it sees someone you don't actually know. Now available in both indoor and outdoor versions, the IQ is by far the most advanced consumer security camera on the market today.
All of that capability does come at a price, and a relatively hefty one. If you don't feel you need the facial recognition feature, you can get the same performance for significantly less with the original Nest Cam (sidenote: due to biometric data laws facial recognition is not available in Illinois). Also, that feature is only available with a Nest subscription. You only get 3 hours of video history if you don't pony up for a subscription, so this camera is really only useful if you buy in. If you want more history without a subscription, the NETGEAR Arlo Q would be a viable alternative. However, if you're willing to pay for advanced features that can streamline your experience and cut down on nuisance alerts, you can't beat the IQ.
Read review: Nest Cam IQ
Top Pick for Outdoor Camera
Nest Cam Outdoor
: 1080p | Power Source
: Standard Outlet
Great video quality
Smooth real-time viewing
Field leading monitoring services available
Very limited without a subscription
If your security camera needs extend to the outdoors, the Nest Cam Outdoor offers both the best quality and user experience of any of the cameras we tested. With impressively clear video, seamless live viewing streams and a 25' cable that increases placement opportunities, this camera certainly won't leave you wanting. Nest's activity zones and person alerts can also cut down on nuisance alerts, so you won't get an alert every time a squirrel runs along the fence. You can even upgrade to the Nest Cam IQ Outdoor, which uses facial recognition to only send alerts when the camera sees an unfamiliar person..
Like all Nest products, this camera is only worthwhile if you're willing to spend at least $50/year on a Nest subscription. Without the subscription, you only get 3 hours of video history and none of the advanced features that make Nest's cameras stand out. The fact that the Nest Cam Outdoor needs to be plugged in means no lapses in coverage for recharging, but also somewhat limits where you can put it. If you're looking for a less expensive, totally wireless outdoor camera the Blink XT would be a better choice. But if you want the best video quality you can get in an outdoor camera, don't mind paying for a subscription, and have a conveniently placed outlet, this is the best option around.
Read review: Nest Cam Outdoor
Nest Cameras: Should I upgrade to the IQ version?
Nest now offers both their indoor and outdoor cameras in an IQ version. The only difference between the original and IQ versions is the facial recognition feature, which zooms in and takes a mugshot whenever the camera sees a face. It also raises the price for both the indoor and outdoor version.
Do you need this feature? If you're willing to spend the extra money and a little time scrolling through mugshots to teach your camera which faces you recognize, so that in turn you can get a different notification when the camera sees a friend versus a stranger, then get the IQ
. If that feature doesn't seem important, save some money and go with one of the original versions. One note: due to sticter biometric data laws
, the facial recognition feature cannot be used in Illinois.
Best on a Budget
Wyze Cam v2
: 1080p | Power Source
: Standard Outlet
Good video quality
Generous non-subscription services
Real time viewing can be laggy
Relatively narrow field of view
Only stores 12-second clips once every 5 minutes
With the release of the Wyze Cam v2, the home security camera market has its first viable shoestring budget option. For just a fraction of what most models cost, this camera provides 1080p footage, a convenient and intuitive app, real-time viewing, standard activity alerts, and a 14-day history of 12-second activity clips stored on Wyze's cloud. You even get motion detection zones that allow you to cut down on the number of meaningless motion alerts that get sent to your phone. This essentially provides most of the functionality you get from one of the high-end cameras and a monthly subscription fee for just a small fraction of the price.
The biggest shortcoming of the Wyze is that the camera takes 5 minutes to reset after it senses motion and records a 12-second clip. That means if there is continuous activity in front of the camera, it is only going to record 12-seconds of video once every 5-minutes. You can rectify this by storing footage locally on a microSD card, in which case the camera will record all the motion it sees, but you can then lose that footage if someone steals the camera itself. This may be a dealbreaker for some people, but if you just want the ability to quickly check in on the house and review small chunks of what's happened there over the last two weeks this, is by far the least expensive option.
Read review: Wyze Cam v2
Best Buy for Outdoor Use
: 720p | Power Source
: 2 AA Batteries
Good video quality
Poor real-time viewing
No subscription services to expand storage
Boasting a waterproof housing, totally wireless capability thanks to internal AA batteries, and some free cloud services, the Blink XT is the least expensive option we've found for monitoring your front yard. The high-definition camera provides good video quality for both day and nighttime clips. Blink also offers 2 hours of free cloud video storage. You just set how long you want the camera to record for whenever it senses motion, and the most recent 2 hours of footage will always be available for watching.
Like most of the less expensive models we've tested, the Blink XT does have some issues when it comes to real-time viewing. Namely, we found that the feed tended to freeze and jump around a bit. It still provided enough good frames to see what was going on, but it certainly wasn't a streamlined viewing experience. Blink also doesn't offer any subscription services, so if that 2 hours of storage proves to be too little, there isn't any way to expand it. However, these sacrifices feel worth the cost savings compared to other outdoor models, and considering the fact that this camera is usable without paying for a subscription.
Read review: Blink XT
Top Pick for 24 Hour Monitoring
Logitech Circle 2 Wireless
: 1080p | Power Source
: Standard Outlet and Rechargable Battery
Great video quality
Good real time viewing
Convenient day brief time lapse feature
Very wide field of view
More fisheye distortion than other cameras
If you're dealing with incessant vandalism or vanishing lawn ornaments, it can be really nice to review everything your camera has seen in the last 24-hours quickly. That's where the Logitech Circle 2 excels. It compresses all of the activity that it's seen in the last 24 hours into a 30-second timelapse, letting you quickly and easily identify the person (or raccoon) that knocked over your garbage bins. It also has a super wide field of view, is waterproof, and has a rechargeable battery, meaning you can place it almost everywhere and get a good view of things.
The Logitech Circle 2 has very few downsides. It does have more of a fisheye effect than other cameras, so some videos do look oddly distorted. However, this really doesn't affect its usefulness at all. It also offers only a 24-hour video history without a subscription, but since you can so easily review the past 24-hours this feels like more than it actually is. Bottom line, for those that want to easily be able to monitor everything that goes on in front of the camera, the Circle 2 is a high-performing and convenient option.
Read review: Logitech Circle 2 Wireless
Great for Amazon Key Users
Amazon Cloud Cam
: 1080p | Power Source
: Standard Outlet
Great video quality
Good real time viewing
Works seamlessly with Amazon Key
Poor non-subscription services
The new Amazon Key Service uses a smart lock to allow delivery people to open your door and place your Amazon packages inside, instead of just leaving them on the porch. The system also uses an Amazon Cloud Cam to monitor the whole process, so you can be assured nothing nefarious happened. This has led to many people wondering if the Cloud Cam is actually a good camera, or just something they'll be roped into buying if they want to use this service.
We can tell you that the Cloud Cam is a great camera, offering high-quality video, good real-time viewing, and somewhat reasonable subscription prices. Sure, it doesn't offer great services if you don't buy the subscription, and we've found the Nest cameras to have slightly better quality overall. However, if you're looking at the Amazon Key service because you've had a couple packages stolen off your porch, we don't think you should have any trepidation about the quality of the camera. While not the best, it is quite capable and high-quality.
Read review: Amazon Cloud Cam
Compare Top Products
Displaying 17 Products
All 11 of the cameras we tested. In the top row are (left to right) the Canary Flex, Logitech Circle (recently discontinued), NETGEAR Arlo Pro, NETGEAR Arlo, Nest Cam Indoor, and the Samsung SmartCam HD Pro. In the bottom row are (left to right) the Nest Cam Outdoor, Canary All-in-One Security Device, YI Dome, Blink, and the NETGEAR Arlo Q.
Why You Should Trust Us
Max Mutter and Steven Tata have been testing smart home devices, including security cameras, smart locks, smart speakers, Wi-Fi thermostats, and robot vacuums, for more than 3 years. After using more than 100 smart products and all of their associated apps, Max and Steven have a deep understanding of the attributes that can make these devices a useful addition to daily chores and habits, and what kinds of annoyances can make them superfluous trinkets that aren't worth buying. They've also spent 100s of hours evaluating video quality in a side-by-side manner, not only with security cameras but with projectors, camera drones, dash cams, and Chromebooks as well.
This review comprises over 200 hours of hands-on testing, as well as countless hours of passively letting the cameras do their thing. In that time we evaluated dozens of hours of both day and nighttime footage from each camera, side-by-side, to determine which produce the best video quality. We also evaluated the quality of real-time video feeds and the relative lag times in those feeds. Possibly most importantly, we lived with each camera in one of our homes for multiple weeks, providing a holistic look at how many meaningful motion alerts each camera produced versus the number of meaningless, nuisance alerts, and how easy it was to use advanced settings in the corresponding apps to improve those ratios.
Can These Cameras Replace a Security System?
Unfortunately, the answer is no. While many of these cameras can sound alarms to ward off intruders, doing so requires user input. That means you'll have to be awake and hear the alert on your phone saying the camera has seen motion. Then you'll need to enter the app and check the camera's live feed to confirm there is actually an intruder and that the camera wasn't just confused by a stray shadow. Finally, you can then press the button to sound the alarm. While this could be effective under ideal circumstances, we've found that it is unlikely to work out that way in the real world. First off, even the best cameras tend to send more nuisance alerts than meaningful ones, so the likelihood that you'll end up ignoring those alerts, or even shut them off altogether, is fairly high. Second, you'd have to be glued to your phone to guarantee you'd see an alert of an actual intruder and be able to actually notify the police in time to stop a robbery in progress (and you don't want to spend your vacation glued to your phone). While these cameras are unlikely to stop a burglary, they are great for checking in on pets, making sure the kids got home from school ok, the general peace of mind that comes from being able to confirm that everything is ok at the homestead, and possibly getting footage of an intruder that could lead to getting any stolen possessions back (but we wouldn't hang your hat on that one).
Analysis and Test Results
The best security camera allows you to easily and quickly check in on what is happening in your home, sends meaningful alerts when something out of the ordinary happens, and reliability captures footage of any motion that it sees. We boiled the building blocks needed to achieve that functionality into four different metrics: monitoring performance, video quality, app user-friendliness, and real time viewing. We then meticulously tested those aspects of each camera, side-by-side, to find the best in every price range.
For those that want the best possible performance from a security camera, the Nest IQ line along with a subscription is the clear way to go, but it is also the most expensive way to go. If you can do without some advanced features like facial recognition, the Amazon Cloud Cam offers otherwise top-notch performance at more of a middle-tier price range. For bargain seekers that don't want to be tied to a subscription premium, the Blink XT is the best value we've found for outdoor use, and the impressively inexpensive Wyze Cam v2 offers an incredible value for indoor applications.
Capable cameras like the Canary All-in-One can let you know what is happening in your home at all times.
The best video quality in the world won't do you any good if your camera doesn't capture the clips you need, if you can't access the clips that it has captured, or if you get so many extraneous activity alerts that you start ignoring them completely. Our testing focused on these aspects. Additionally, most manufacturers require a paid subscription to unlock some of their monitoring features, so we broke all of the cameras' performances down into what you get for free, and what you have to pay extra for.
Nest offers very little to non-subscribers with only a 3-hour video history, activity alerts, and no downloads. Without a subscription Nest cameras are great for live viewing, but not much else. Buying a subscription unlocks the best monitoring services of any brand out there, including 24/7 video recording, the ability to save clips, time lapses, and intelligent alerts. These intelligent alerts include activity zones, which let you tell the camera to look for motion in front of the door, but to ignore motion outside the window. Other brands offer similar features, but we've found Nest's to be the most effective at cutting out erroneous motion alerts (though it is still far from perfect). You can also receive a separate alert when the camera sees a person versus simply seeing motion. We found this feature to work quite well, though pets could sometime trigger the person alert. Finally, the top of the line Nest IQ models can identify specific people (after a bit of user input) and thus warn you specifically when the camera sees an unfamiliar face (note: this feature not available in Illinois). All Nest cameras also offer clear 2-way audio, so you can converse with anyone standing in front of the camera.
Nest subscriptions are priced based on the amount of video history that is stored on the cloud. $5 a month (or $50 upfront for the full year) gets you 5 days of 24/7 stored video history. $10/month or $100 for the year and $30/month or $300 for the year gets you 10 and 30 day histories, respectively.
What is this sorcery? I hear human but do not see it. - A cat mystified by the Nest's clear 2-way audio.
Amazon's Cam has much more generous non-subscription services than Nest, providing a 24-hour history of motion activated clips for free. Subscriptions start at $7/month or $70/year. The basic level gets a 7-day history of motion activated clips, specific alerts for when the camera sees a person, Amazon zones, which are similar to Nest's motion zones, support for up to 3 cameras. For $10/month or $100/year you get a 14-day history and support for up to 5 cameras, and for $20/month or $200/year, you get a 30-day history and support for up to 10 cameras. However, all of these histories only include motion-activated clips, not the 24/7 history offered by Nest. You also get 2-way audio with or without a subscription.
Logitech offers a reasonably generous 24 hours of video history without a subscription. However, only clips where motion is detected are actually saved, so you don't get a full 24-hour history, but you can download and save as many of those clips as you'd like. Those motion clips are helpfully compressed into a single, summary time-lapse, so you can easily review everything the camera has seen in the last day in just 30 seconds. $4/ month bumps your video history of motion activated clips to 14 days. $10 gets you 31 days, the ability to get a special alert when your camera sees a person, and you can set 'motion zones' - areas where the camera will ignore or specifically look for motion. These motion zones work well but aren't quite as good as the similar technology offered by Nest. Like most brands, all of Logitech's cameras offer 2-way audio.
Canary was once the champion of non-subscription monitoring services, but the company, unfortunately, reduced their offerings. Without a monthly fee, you still get a 24-hour history of motion activated clips, but those clips are limited to 10 seconds. So, if something happens in front of your camera for 20 seconds, you're going to miss half of it. You do get Canary's version of motion zones for free, which is a huge plus if you're tired of getting notifications every time a leaf blows by the window. With a $10/month subscription, the history is increased to 30 days and the maximum video clip length grows to 10 minutes. We love that you can get activity sones for free, but the short non-subscription clip length may be a deal-breaker for some users. Canary is also one of the few brands that don't offer 2-way audio. You'll be able to hear people speaking in front of the camera, but you can't talk back to them. You can, however, sound an ominous sounding alarm at the push of a button.
Most motion zones, like those offered by Samsung (left) are restricted to rectangular shapes. Nest's version of the technology (right) is much more customizable.
NETGEAR cameras offer a large amount of available video history, a full seven days or 1GB (whichever comes first), without a subscription plan. This means you can go on a week's vacation and still be able to view everything that happened at home when you get back (unless the camera sees a lot of motion and fills up the 1GB cloud capacity). However, clips are only captured when motion is detected, so you do miss out on the 24/7 video history offered by some other brands. You can download any of the captured clips to save indefinitely. Activity alerts also come standard without a subscription. Of NETGEAR's offerings, the Arlo Q was the best performer with a score of 7 out of 10 in this metric. This was mostly due to its expanded subscription offerings ($10 and $20 monthly plans get you 14 and 30 days of 24/7 video history) and decent audio quality. The Arlo Pro earned a 5 due to diminished audio quality and the Arlo scored a 4 due to lack of audio. These cameras are compatible with Arlo's standard monthly subscriptions, where $10 gets you a history of 30 days or 10GB and $15 gets 60 days or 100GB.
Ring offers a long 60-day history of motion activated clips (with a subscription), but lacks the 24/7 recording of Nest.
Ring offers just a bare-bones monitoring experience without a subscription: no clips stored on the cloud and only basic motion alerts and live viewing. For a reasonable $3 a month you get a long, 60-day history of motion-activated clips stored on the cloud, and activity zones that allow you to select areas where the camera should look for and ignore motion. While these activity zones generally worked in our testing, they weren't quite as effective at reducing superfluous alerts as the version offered by Nest (however, no motion zones were able to reduce alerts to a point where we didn't feel compelled to turn them off). If you buy a Ring alarm system you can also get professional monitoring of that alarm, plus all of the camera,s features, for $10/month.
The YI Dome Camera boasts a free 7-day cloud history of activity events, but saved clips are limited to 6 seconds, making it likely you'll miss some crucial footage if a significant event occurs. This limitation bumped its score down to a relatively low 5 out of 10 in this metric. We couldn't find any literature stating how long it takes the Dome to reset and record another 6-second clip when there is continuous motion, but in our testing, the shortest interval we encountered was 30 seconds. This means, best case scenario if there is continuous activity in front of the camera it is recording 17% of the action. Two different $10/month plans offer a 15-day history of 6-second clips for up to 5 cameras, or 15 days of 24/7 history for one camera. Both plans can also be upgraded to 30-day histories. Like most cameras, YI offers 2-way audio.
Wyze store only 12-second clips on the cloud once every 5 minutes, but offers more local storage on a microSD card.
Wyze offers one of the most generous non-subscription packages of all the camera manufacturers, with a free 14-day history of 12-second, motion activated clips. It also provides basic alerts, sending your phone a notification every time the camera sees motion. You even get motion detection zones that allow you to specify areas where you want the camera look for motion. This is great if you only want the camera to alert you of motion in a very specific area, like the doorway, but it's a bit clunky if you just want the camera to ignore a specific area, like a window (Nest does a much better job of the latter). Additionally, Wyze cameras only record 12-second motion activated clips to the cloud at a maximum of once every 5 minutes. To record more than that you have to record locally to a microSD card. All of Wyze's cameras also have two-way audio, so you can hear the people talking in front of the camera, and talk back to them.
The Blink camera stores up to 2 hours of video on the cloud, but does not offer any subscription service to increase that storage.
Blink received the lowest score in this metric. For free it offers activity alerts and cloud-stored clips of recorded activity totaling up to 2 hours of video. Clips can be manually deleted to free up space, so you'll have to remember to empty out your storage before you leave for vacation. There are no subscription plans available to expand upon this storage. Blink also does not offer any sort of siren or 2-way audio, so if you see an intruder on the camera you can't scare them away remotely, you'll have to go home or call the police.
Cameras with 1080p resolution and wider lenses, like the Nest Cam Indoor (left) produce much better footage than those with 720p resolution and narrower lenses, like the YI Dome (right).
The most obvious and arguably most relevant performance aspect of wifi home security cameras is video quality. If you can't make out an intruder's face, tell which pup ripped open the kibble bag, or clearly see that everything is in its place, there isn't much point in having a security camera. We tested all of the cameras in both day and night with faux break-ins, rambunctious pets, and normal, everyday activity. Just remember that most of these cameras have relatively small sensors and sometimes compress the video both for real-time viewing and for storage on the cloud, so don't expect a 1080p model to look like the HD movies you watch on your TV.
For the most part, the scores were fairly tightly packed in this metric, with 1080p models performing a bit higher than their lower resolution counterparts. The Nest Cam IQ was the sharpest camera in our testing, with both day and nighttime footage looking very crisp. The IQ is the only camera with a 4K sensor, and while its video is better than the 1080p models we tested, it certainly isn't 4 times the resolution. We think most of the 4K sensor's horsepower is used for the IQ's facial recognition feature.
Even high definition cameras, like the Canary Flex, often struggled with getting clear footage of motion.
Also in the groups of top scorers were the Nest Cam Indoor and the Nest Cam Outdoor. Both of these Nest models created top-notch daytime footage, and a plush 130˚ field of view with only minor distortion at the edges. The night vision was also very clear, but not the best.
Also providing great video quality in our testing was the Ring Stick Up Cam Wired. Though its 1080p footage is just a tad less crisp than that of the Nest cameras, its night footage provides field leading detail and the 150˚ field of view is wider than that of most cameras.
Another member of the 8 out of 10 club, the Canary All-in-One Security Device provides a wide 147˚ field of view while only producing a small amount of distortion at the edge of the frame. It backs that up with crisp day and nighttime footage, though lots of motion would sometimes leave the image looking a bit pixelated.
The Amazon Cloud Cam surprised us with its great video quality, considering its more middle-of-the-road price, as it picked up a high score of 8 out of 10 in this metric. The images it produced, both day and nighttime, were on par with those of the Nest Cam. In fact, the nighttime images were just slightly brighter. The only downside is the field of view is a bit narrower than most at 120˚.
Still providing 1080p resolution, but not in the top group of scorers, was the Canary Flex. It scored a 7 out of 10 in this metric. It still boasts super clear daytime footage, and night vision that is up to par with the top scorers. Its exclusion from the top group was solely due to it relatively narrow 116˚ field of view, which was by far the narrowest of the 1080p models we tested. The NETGEAR Arlo Q also scored a 7. It has a nice 130˚ wide field of view and great daytime video quality, but its night vision was noticeable a step down in clarity when compared to the top scorers.
Both Wyze cameras we tested provided good, but not the best footage. Daytime video looks sharp with good color and detail. The night vision is similarly clear when there is even a small amount of ambient light, but if the camera has to rely on its own infra-red light (think total darkness) things can get a bit grainy. The Wyze Cam v2 has a realtively narrow 110˚ field of view. The Wyze Cam Pan's view is slightly wider, but still somewhat narrow, at 120˚. IT can also pan to follow motion, but we found that unless your subject decides to slow-motion walk in front of the camera, it probably won't be able to keep up with them.
Rounding out the 7 out of 10 club, the Logitech Circle 2 provides the widest field of view of any of our cameras, a whopping 180˚. This does come at the expense of some very noticeable fisheye distortion, but the sheer area the camera can cover is incredibly impressive. The 1080p resolution produces a nice, clear image, and the night vision quality is well above average, falling just short of the quality of the Nest Cam IQ.
The Blink XT also provides 1080p resolution and earned a video quality score of 6 out of 10. The video looks fairly crisp, but tends to look a bit dark. This dark quality remained even in well-lit rooms. It has a 110˚ field of view.
The Logitech Circle 2's night vision captures quite a bit of detail.
Dropping down into the 720p resolution bracket, the NETGEAR Arlo and NETGEAR Arlo Pro were our top performers, both earning a score of 6 out of 10 in our video quality testing. Day and night time footage of these models still looked fairly crisp, but was clearly inferior when compared side by side with footage from the higher resolution models. The Arlo Pro does provide a wider field of view than the Arlo: 130˚ vs 110˚.
The YI Dome Camera scored a 5 out of 10 in this metric. Both its day and night time videos were noticeably more grainy than the NETGEAR 720p models and has a fairly narrow 112˚ field of view. This is partially compensated for as it can swivel around nearly 360˚. It can also be set to automatically pan to follow moving objects, which does make its effective viewing range much bigger. However, if someone walks quickly past the camera it won't swivel in time to follow them and you'll still be limited to that fairly narrow view.
The Blink received our lowest score of 3 out of 10 in this metric. The relatively low 720p resolution and small lens combined to create the grainiest videos we viewed in our testing. They still provide enough detail to check in on the house or driveway but are reminiscent of watching a youtube video with a bad internet connection. It is also the only camera we tested that does not have infrared night vision. It can still take video at night by turning on a bright LED, but this draws a lot of attention to the camera: not ideal for trying to catch a good image of an intruder. Additionally, because it relies on an actual light its range is very limited at night.
In our testing the Nest Cam app was the easiest to use for browsing video histories and setting schedules.
App Ease of Use
Once installed, your wifi home security camera's app will be the only way you will interact with it (we found all the cameras were very similar in their initial setup, so we didn't score that aspect of their ease of use). Being able to easily navigate through activity alert histories and live viewing is crucial. We tested app ease of use by having multiple testers install every camera app on their phones (our wireless providers now think we're super paranoid) and assess side by side how easy it was to navigate through each camera's video history, settings, and features. We also forced them to attend to each activity alert they received and to try to adjust the alert setting to see if they could get only the kinds of alerts they wanted.
Nest, in conjunction with its subscription, offers more features and adjustability than any other wifi home security camera manufacturer. They also designed an amazing app with which to navigate those features. The Nest app took home the top score of 9 out of 10 in our app ease of use testing. Browsing video history and adjusting settings is very easy within the app, and the customizable alerts greatly improve the usefulness of the camera. The only bummer: Nest's industry-leading activity zones must be set on a computer and can't be adjusted on the app. Also, remember that the majority of these features aren't available without a subscription.
The Ring app is the only one we've found that can match the user-friendliness and intuitiveness of the Nest app. Setting schedules, adjusting motion sensitivity and adding one of Ring's motion zones can all be easily accopmplished without any fuss or googling for directions.
Amazon's Cam App is very intuitive and lets you easily adjust any setting you'd like. The only reason it didn't receive a top score is the fact that it does not off a scheduling option, so you have to use geofencing to ensure the camera turns on and off when you leave and return home. This isn't a huge deal, but could be annoying if you like to keep your phone's locations services turned off.
Wyze's app provides a fialry stremalined user experience, with most funtions easily accessed and adjusted. We did find setting up one of Wyze's motion detection zones could be a bit clunky, but still not too painful.
NETGEAR also offers a well-designed app for its Arlo cameras, earning a score of 8 out of 10 in this metric. It offers easy management of video history and adjustment of settings. Navigating the app felt just slightly clunkier than the super streamlined Nest app, but was still intuitive.
We found initial setup to be very easy on all of the cameras we tested. Each one had an easy way to get the camera talking to a smartphone, like this sync button on the NETGEAR Arlo Q.
We also liked the design of Blink's app, which also scored an 8 out of 10 in this metric. It's very easy to adjust things like clip length and to browse and manage the video history. It is also easy to add multiple cameras, making it clear Blink designed the app to work in conjunction with its multi-camera packages. Though easy to use, the apps basic layout felt just a bit less streamlined than the Nest app, and the nice app couldn't compensate for the poor camera.
Canary's app is well designed and received a score of 7 out of 10 in our ease of use testing. Its menu makes it easy to download clips and adjust notification settings. However, you must swipe down to switch from a live view back to the menu. Sometimes this gesture wasn't recognized and it certainly wasn't the intuitive thing to do on the first go around, hence the slightly lower score.
Logitech also offers a fairly user-friendly, but not completely intuitive, app. Sometimes you may have to search through a few menus before finding the setting you're looking for, but after a short learning curve, it's not much of a hassle. It also got huge brownie points for being able to make its 30-second timelapses that show all the action from the previous 24 hours.
One of the first things you see when you open the Logitech app is a button to create one of its convenient day briefs.
YI's app is well suited to its Dome Camera but could be a bit more straightforward. It earned a 6 out of 10 in our testing. The app provides a nice little onscreen joystick to move the camera around, but the latency in the camera's response makes it hard to get it just where you want. It's generally easy to adjust settings and browse the video history, but often cryptic symbols are used to represent certain menus rather than words, so there is a small learning curve.
Whether inside or out, Nest made our favorite cameras for real time viewing.
Real Time Viewing
Whether it's the peace of mind that comes with seeing your kids safely home after school, or knowing that the dog hasn't ripped the couch apart, real-time viewing is one of the best and most used aspects of wifi home security cameras. We used all of our cameras to look after pets, watch things be shifted around our storage facility, and to snoop on coworkers complaining about free brownies that everyone should appreciate. We also timed latency by walking in front of each camera and then timing how long it took for that to show up in the live view window in the app. (Please note: the latency periods we experienced are not absolute. Different users may experience different latency times based on their internet connection, any possible sources of interference, and a myriad of other factors. However, since we tested all of the cameras under the exact same conditions, our times represent accurate relative comparisons of the latency of each device.)
If you mostly wasn't a security camera for checking in on your home or pets in real time, we would suggest you either get a camera from Nest, from Ring, or look at the Amazon Cloud Cam. All of these cameras shared the top score of 8 out of 10 in this metric, and all offered superb real-time viewing experience. These cameras provided unmatched picture quality in our real-time viewing tests, and all had less than 5 seconds of lag time, so we were watching event almost right as they happened.
The Logitech Circle 2 Wirelesswas just slightly behind the top performers in this metric, earning a 7 out of 10. It produced a nice and clear live stream in our testing with only some very occasional hiccups and moments of pixelation. We did knock the score a bit because it takes the Circle 2 about 45 seconds to wake up from its sleep mode. So if you haven't checked the live stream in a while, you'll probably have to wait 45 seconds after opening the app to actually see what's going on.
The Nest Cam Outdoor was far and away our favorite outdoor model for real time viewing.
The NETGEAR Arlo picked up a 6 out of 10 in out real-time viewing test. It boasts a latency of only 5 seconds, but the feed had to pause and refresh multiple times in just a 30-second span, which felt quite distracting. The Canary All-in-One also earned a score of 6. Its latency of 12 seconds is just on the edge of feeling comically slow, but it generally provides a good, smooth video stream. Occasionally that video would get a bit pixelated, but we didn't feel like it was making us miss what was happening. The final score of 6 went to the YI Dome Camera, which had a fairly low latency of just 5 seconds in our testing. It produced a smooth video stream, but that stream was generally a low-quality picture, and certainly not the 720p resolution of the clips saved to the cloud by the Dome.
At the bottom of our score sheet were a number of models that scored a 5 out of 10 in this metric. While these models all provide a high enough quality live stream to reassure yourself that no one has broken into the house, they are infuriating if you're actually trying to watch activity (such as seeing what the pets or kids are up to). These models include the NETGEAR Arlo Q and both Wyze cameras that we tested.
The Blink constantly stops and asks if you want to continue when using it for real time viewing. It did not amuse our testers.
With an average score of 5 out of 10, the NETGEAR Arlo Pro offers a usable, but not great real-time viewing experience. We measured the lag time at 12 seconds, which isn't too bad. However, the video often became pixelated and sometimes froze and jumped. We could still see well enough that you could use this camera to make sure your pup is ok, but it certainly isn't the best.
Both Blink models we tested earned the lowest score of 4 out of 10 in this metric. They are actually quite good when it comes to latency, with a delay of just 5 seconds. However, the video was very choppy and got quite pixelated at times. Again, there were enough ok looking frames tha you still get a usable view of what's going on, but it's certaintly not a pleasnat experience. The stream also stops every 30 seconds to ask if you want to keep watching, which can be annoying if you're trying to figure out where Fido got off to.
Wifi security cameras are a great way to keep an eye on pets while you're at work, make sure the house is still standing when you're on vacation, or to make sure the kids made it home from school. While these cameras are not yet effective replacements for traditional, totally autonomous security systems, they can add a bit of convenience and peace of mind to your life. However, picking the right one requires researching capabilities, quality, and the types of services you get both with and without a subscription. We hope that our testing results have cleared up the confusion that can arise with these cameras.