We compared over 100 different wireless routers, then bought the top 12 models currently available to test out head-to-head to find out which router rules them all. We compared and scored the range and throughput (2.4 GHz. and 5 GHz.) of each product using a series of software tests. We also ranked and evaluated the user-friendliness and ease of use of each Wi-Fi router and looked at all the different features and functions. Check out the complete review below to see which router is best for heavy-duty streaming, which is a premium product for gaming, and which gives you the most bandwidth when shopping on a budget.
Best Wireless Routers of 2019
$214.95 at Amazon
$388.00 at Amazon
$98.99 at Amazon
$84.99 at Amazon
$129.00 at Amazon
|Pros||Extremely easy to use, packed with features||Tons of features, easy to use||Relatively inexpensive, exceptional range||Very easy to use, more affordable, solid set of features||Super easy to use, decent set of features|
|Cons||Average range, throughput||Expensive, mediocre throughput||Sparse on features, average throughput||Unimpressive throughput and range||Below average throughput, somewhat expensive|
|Bottom Line||Taking home the top score, the Asus is the best of the best when it comes to routers||This expensive product failed to impress with its lackluster range and throughput scores||The NETGEAR would be a good option for those shopping for an upgrade pick on a budget and have a larger home||The Nighthawk AC1750 is our top recommendation for those budget-conscious shoppers that are willing to spend a little bit more for better performance||While this router did alright, it seemed a little expensive relative to its results|
|Rating Categories||ASUS RT-AC88U...||NETGEAR Nighthawk...||NETGEAR AC1750...||Nighthawk AC1750...||ASUS RT-AC68U...|
|Ease Of Use (20%)|
|2 4 Ghz Throughput (20%)|
|5 Ghz Throughput (20%)|
|Specs||ASUS RT-AC88U...||NETGEAR Nighthawk...||NETGEAR AC1750...||Nighthawk AC1750...||ASUS RT-AC68U...|
|Wireless Specification||802.11ac||802.11ad||802.11ac||802.11ac|| 2.4 GHz: 802.11n
5 GHz: 802.11ac
|LAN Ports Available||8||6||4||4||4|
|Security||WPA2 Personal, WPA Auto Personal, WPA2 Enterprise, WPA Auto Enterprise||WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA/WPA2 Enterprise||WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA/WPA2 Enterprise||WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA/WPA2 Enterprise||WPA2 Personal, WPA Auto Personal, WPA2 Enterprise, WPA Auto Enterprise|
|Frequency||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz, 5GHz, 60GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz|
|USB Ports||2: 3.0 and 2.0||2: 3.0||2: 3.0 and 2.0||1: 3.0||2: 3.0 and 2.0|
|Dimensions||11.8" x 7.4" x 2.38"||8.81" x 6.61" x 2.91"||7.2" x 11.22" x 2.4"||7.26" x 11.22" x 1.97"||6.3" x 3.3" x 8.6"|
|Antenna||4 external||4 external||3 external||3 external||3 external|
|Processor||1.4 GHz dual-core||1.7 GHz quad-core||880 MHz dual-core||1 GHz dual-core||1 GHz dual-core processor|
|Memory||128 MB Flash
512 MB DDR3 RAM
|512 MB NAND Flash
1 GB DDR3 SDRAM
|128 MB Flash
256 MB RAM
|128 MB Flash
256 MB RAM
|128 MB Flash
256 MB RAM
|2.4 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||51 Mbits/s||49 Mbits/s||47 Mbits/s||48 Mbits/s||45 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Obstructed||39 Mbits/s||46 Mbits/s||37 Mbits/s||47 Mbits/s||44 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||39 Mbits/s||47 Mbits/s||39 Mbits/s||43 Mbits/s||29 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Obstructed||38 Mbits/s||45 Mbits/s||40 Mbits/s||37 Mbits/s||23 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Long Distance Throughput||27 Mbits/s||10 Mbits/s||22 Mbits/s||25 Mbits/s||13 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||212 Mbits/s||186 Mbits/s||220 Mbits/s||211 Mbits/s||186 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Obstructed||211 Mbits/s||157 Mbits/s||184 Mbits/s||201 Mbits/s||161 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||204 Mbits/s||198 Mbits/s||196 Mbits/s||211 Mbits/s||153 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Obstructed||186 Mbits/s||145 Mbits/s||181 Mbits/s||194 Mbits/s||167 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Long Distance Throughput||37 Mbits/s||46 Mbits/s||17 Mbits/s||11 Mbits/s||35 Mbits/s|
|Video Playback Range Test||158 ft.||144 ft.||204 ft.||155 ft.||144 ft.|
Best Overall Router
ASUS RT-AC88U Wireless-AC3100
Receiving the highest score that we have seen to date by a decent margin, the ASUS RT-AC88U is the clear choice for winning an Editors' Choice Award and the title of Best Wireless Router Overall. This top-notch router has one of the most comprehensive series of features and functions, all while being one of the most intuitive and easy to operate routers of the entire group. On top of all that, it tied for the top spot when it came to 5 GHz. throughput and in the runner-up position overall in our series of 2.4 GHz. tests.
Unfortunately, the effective range on this router is more average than amazing and it is a bit on the more expensive side. However, we think it is the best of the best and is the perfect option for someone who needs exceptional streaming performance from their router — as long as they are willing to pay a premium for it.
Read review: ASUS RT-AC88U Wireless-AC3100
Best Upgrade Budget Pick
NETGEAR Nighthawk AC1750 (R6700v2)
If you are looking for a high-performance router and the price tag of the ASUS RT-AC88U is causing you to panic, then you should consider the Nighthawk AC1750 (R6700v2) by NETGEAR. Earning the Best Buy Award, this router tied for the third place overall, but retails for less than half of what the RT-AC88U does. It is still quite easy to use and holds its own with the top products when it comes to throughput on its 2.4 GHz. and 5 GHz. networks. Additionally, it also has a phenomenal range, with our test computer able to effectively stream video at one of the furthest distance out of the entire group when connected to the Nighthawk.
However, this router does have a reduced set of features and functions when compared to the top-of-the-line products. In spite of that, this is our favorite product to recommend to someone that is shopping on a budget, but willing to pay a small premium for better performance.
Read review: NETGEAR Nighthawk AC1750 (R6700v2)
Best on a Tight Budget
TP-Link Archer A6 (AC1200)
If the price point of the previous two routers is far too high for you, then you may want to consider the Archer A6 by TP-Link, which netted a Best Buy Award for pairing a decent performance with a much more affordable price tag than the top models. This router has a surprisingly impressive set of features given its budget nature and is one of the more intuitive and easier to use routers.
However, the A6 isn't the most impressive of the group when it comes to throughput performance or range. It isn't terrible but we would recommend other routers over this one if you have a household with tons of bandwidth-intensive devices or a particularly far-flung network configuration. The A6 is a fantastic option on a tight budget but there is plenty of room for improvement if you are willing to pay more for an upgraded model.
Read review: TP-Link Archer A6 (AC1200)
Why You Should Trust Us?
At TechGearLab, we bought all of the routers in this review at retail pricing, just like you might, and won't ever accept any free evaluation units to include in our reviews. Our lead Wi-Fi router testing team of Austin Palmer and David Wise have both made a career out of reviewing tech and smart home products and have tested and reviewed hundreds of these products for TechGearLab. On top of their professional experience, Austin also brings his expertise as an avid PC gamer into this review. He has extensively played PC games for over a decade, giving him a multitude of experiences — both good and bad — with various wireless routers.
To find out which wireless router topped them all, we looked at existing user reviews of products, as well as various forum posts and other information to assemble a list of almost 75 different routers that looked like they might have the potential to claim an award. Then, we picked the most highly-regarded products on the list and bought them to test side-by-side to see which one is truly the best. We did extensive range testing, seeing just how far away you can be from the router and still receive acceptable streaming speed and measured the throughput of each one on both the 2.4 GHz. and 5 GHz. to quantitatively compare their performance.
Related: How We Tested Wireless Routers
Analysis and Test Results
We broke our comprehensive testing process down into five weighted metrics: Features, Ease of Use, 2.4 GHz. Throughput, 5 GHz. Throughput, and Range. Each metric consisted of a handful of tests, with the performance of each product ranked and scored against its peers. The sections below detail the results for each metric, highlighting which products performed well and which ones fell a little flat.
Related: Buying Advice for Wireless Routers
The TP-Link Archer A6 is the best value if you are shopping on a tight budget and the NETGEAR Nighthawk R6700v2 if you are shopping on a budget but are willing to pay a bit more to upgrade or if your streaming needs exceed the capabilities of the Archer A6.
For our first metric, worth the largest portion of the overall score at 25%, we compared and scored how feature-rich each wireless router is. First, we looked for the presence of three key features on each router: MU-MIMO, Beamforming, and how many LAN ports each product has. MU-MIMO, or multi-user, multiple-input, multiple-output (we know, it's quite a mouthful!) simply means the ability for the router to talk back-and-forth (multiple inputs, multiple outputs) with multiple devices (multi-user) simultaneously. For example, an MU-MIMO router could be sending data back-and-forth between an iPhone, a laptop, and a Smart TV much faster than an SU-MIMO, or non-MU-MIMO router, essentially making your network faster overall and leading to less buffering and lag issues. The second feature, beamforming, refers to how the router shapes the WiFi field. Routers that support beamforming don't send out the same signal strength of WiFi in every direction. Instead, the router communicates with each device to get the relative position and concentrates the signal strength in that direction, leading to better overall signal and reception for each device.
Additionally, we also noted if you could turn the indicator lights on and off, turn the router on and off remotely, and the number and type of USB ports available.
The ASUS RT-AC88U and the NETGEAR Nighthawk X10 tied for the top score, both earning an 8 out of 10 for their impressive suite of features. Both the RT-AC88U and the X10 are MU-MIMO and have beamforming capabilities, as well as the ability to be remotely reset and toggle the indicator lights on and off. The RT-AC88U has a slight edge when it comes to LAN ports having 8 compared to the 6 on the X10.
In terms of hardwired connections, the ASUS RT-AC88U has a slight edge on the Nighthawk X10. Both have a pair of USB connections but the RT-AC88U has one USB 3.0 and one USB 2.0 port, compared to the X10's pair of USB 2.0 ports.
Next, the ASUS RT-AC68U, the NETGEAR Nighthawk, and the Linksys AC1900 Max Stream each merited a 6 out of 10 for their above-average set of features. Both the Nighthawk and the Max Stream have both beamforming and MU-MIMO capabilities, whereas the ASUS RT-AC68U only has beamforming. However, all three of these products allow you to turn off their indicator and network traffic LEDs through the web interface — although the Max Stream leaves the power indicator light on regardless.
However, the Max Stream cannot be power cycled remotely, forcing you to manually reset it when troubleshooting — a huge pain if you keep the router in a difficult to reach location — while the other two can be reset remotely.
This trio each has 4 LAN ports, but only the ASUS RT-AC68U and the Max Stream have a USB 3.0 and a USB 2.0 port. The Nighthawk only has a single USB 3.0 port.
Containing a relatively average set of features, both the NETGEAR AC1750 (R6400) and the TP-Link Archer A6 each earned a 5 out of 10 in this metric. As far as we could tell, the R6400 does NOT have MU-MIMO, but it does support beamforming. This hurt its score considerably, effectively precluding it from a shot at an award. However, this router does have remote reset and the ability to turn the indicator lights off, as well as 4 LAN ports. It also has both a USB 3.0 and a USB 2.0 port.
The Archer A6 is the exact opposite of the R6400, failing to support beamforming but having MU-MIMO capabilities — which is a total rarity for a budget router. Unfortunately, that's about all that stood out positively for this router when it comes to features. You can't turn the LED status lights off and it lacks any USB ports at all so you can't use the A6 for direct file transfer. However, the A6 can be reset remotely and has four Gigabit LAN ports but these are standard features at this point.
Next, the TP-Link Archer C7, the NETGEAR R6220-100NAS, and the NETGEAR AC1200 (R6230) each merited a 4 out of 10 for their limited suite of features. None of these routers have beamforming or MU-MIMO capabilities, which means your network will be quite a bit slower than with top-tier routers if your router isn't in a central location or if you have a large number of devices on the network.
Unfortunately, you can't turn off any of the status indicator LEDs on these routers but they all do have the typical four gigabit LAN ports.
Both the NETGEAR AC1200 R6230 and the NETGEAR R6220-100NAS have a single USB 2.0 port for direct file transfer, while the Archer C7 has a pair of ports. All three of these routers can also be reset remotely through their companion apps.
Finishing at the back of the pack, the D-Link AC1200 earned a 3 out of 10 for its meager set of features. This router lacks the majority of the features that the top products have, failing to have remote reset, MU-MIMO, beamforming, or the ability to turn the LEDs off. It has the typical 4 LAN ports but lacks any USB ports at all.
Ease of Use
Our second series of assessments dealt with how much work it took to set up each router and use them daily, which constitutes 20% of each product's final score. In this metric, we paid specific attention to the initial setup process of each router — the time it took to get the network going, if you needed to update the firmware, and how thorough the documentation is. We also looked at the scope and ease of use of the parental controls and Quality of Service (QoS) of each router, as well as the overall user-friendliness of the interface.
Taking home the top score of 9 out of 10, both the ASUS RT-AC88U and the ASUS RT-AC68U are essentially identical in terms of ease of use, relying on the same interface. Both of these routers impressed us with how little effort it took to get them set up and configured. While both did require an update to their firmware upon unboxing, it wasn't particularly difficult to do. It was an essentially problem-free setup process, with both a helpful web interface and a step-by-step wizard that guides you through configuring the network name and password. The wizard did give us some slight issues changing the network name one of the times that we tried to set it on the ASUS RT-AC88U, but that was it in terms of issues.
Both of these routers have an exceptionally approachable user interface, being one of the most straightforward and easiest to understand of the entire group. You also have the option of enabling parental controls on this device, blocking websites by genre or by specific addresses.
These blocks can also be set on a schedule or set to only apply for certain devices. Finally, both of these ASUS routers support QoS, allowing either adaptive, traditional, or bandwidth-limited.
For those unfamiliar with the term, Quality of Service or QoS allows you to prioritize bandwidth allocations for devices, letting you customize your network to best suit your needs, whether you are a streaming media, gaming, or just casually surfing the web.
Next, both of the TP-Link Archer Models — the A6 and the C7 earned a 7 out of 10 for their excellent ease of use.
Out of the box, both Archers did require a firmware update but this was easily accomplished. You can complete the initial setup process for these routers through either a smartphone app or a personal computer. It's a super easy process whichever way you choose but the smartphone setup is a little more scripted with prompts through every step. The browser-based set up through the computer doesn't do as much to lead you through the process but you also have pretty extensive written documentation to consult if you need it.
The TP-Link Archer C7 and the Archer A6 both have QoS, but it only allows you to sort priority by devices, not by content like some of the other routers in the group.
This pair both have identical parental controls, allowing you to filter out websites by keywords, as well as set a schedule for internet access.
The bulk of the routers came next, with the Linksys AC1900 Max Stream EA7500, the Linksys AC1900 WRT1900ACS, NETGEAR R6220-100NAS, NETGEAR AC1750 R6400, NETGEAR Nighthawk, the NETGEAR Nighthawk X10, and the NETGEAR AC1200 R6230 all earning a 7 out of 10 for their showing in this group of evaluations.
All of the NETGEAR routers that we have tested required firmware updates upon unboxing, except for the AC1200 R6230. However, none of the Linksys routers required a firmware update and were all ready to go right from the box. However, none of these routers are particularly easy to configure the network settings on compared to the rest of the group, with a myriad of problems presenting themselves when we attempted to set the network name and password — except for the AC1200 R6230. The R6230 is one of the easiest models of the entire group to set up, with a very easy to follow process through the mobile app, which has an intuitive and user-friendly interface but is a bit lacking in terms of features.
Both Linksys models, the NETGEAR AC1750 R6400, and the NETGEAR Nighthawk were easier to set up than the Nighthawk X10 and the R6220-100NAS, but still much more difficult than the RT-AC88U or the TP-Link Archers.
The Linksys models both took about 30 minutes for us to get set up, with both giving us an error or freezing and forcing us to start over. We found these to be a little finicky when it came to using the browser interface, so switching browsers is a good idea if you are running into issues.
The NETGEAR Nighthawk and AC1750 both were about the same as the Linksys models, with a wizard to help you set an admin password and network login, but this can be a bit more problematic if you have other existing networks. We found our computer kept wanting to hop to a different network mid-setup process, causing difficulties. The NETGEAR R6220-100NAS was next in terms of setup difficulties. It was pretty much plug-and-play from the get-go with the defaults, but it is a little difficult to find the options to change the network name and password from the defaults.
We were plagued with difficulties when trying to set up the Nighthawk X10. While the wizard did open automatically, it kept failing to load and forced us to switch browsers multiple times.
Moving on to the interface, we vastly preferred the interface of the Linksys routers to the NETGEAR models, putting it second only to the RT-AC88U for being easy to navigate and user-friendly. The NETGEAR browser interface is about average, though it looks a little outdated.
However, the NETGEAR routers minus the R6230 have the most sophisticated set of parental control options. It can be a little more labor-intensive to set up but allows you the finest level of control. The R6230 is pretty limited in letting you customize which content to block, leaving you with the preset lists already in the app. It's decent for blocking a wide spectrum of content but isn't very good at blocking specific things. We found the Linksys parental controls to be quite ineffective for filtering content, as it can only filter by website address, forcing you to create a list of all the questionable content that you want to block — an impossible task. However, you can filter by time, cutting off access to certain devices at certain times.
The Linksys models both have QoS, calling it media prioritization, and is about average in terms of capabilities. The NETGEAR routers also had QoS, but it was mediocre at best, seemingly very outdated compared to other models. Again, the R6230 differentiated itself from the other NETGEAR models, completely lacking QoS as far as we could tell.
Rounding out the group in the last place position, the D-Link AC1200 merited a 6 out of 10. While this model didn't require any immediate firmware updates and was actually one of the easiest routers to set up in our opinion, we found the interface to be very unintuitive and difficult to use. It isn't particularly easy to adjust settings or enable parental controls, though the QoS features are fairly easy to navigate. Overall, the AC1200 paled in comparison to the top models when it comes to user-friendliness.
2.4 GHz. Throughput
For our next two metrics, both worth 20% of the overall score, we looked at each router's throughput, or how fast each router and a test computer can exchange data, both on the 2.4 GHz. and the 5 GHz. frequency ranges. We conducted five different tests for each bandwidth, averaging the results of three trials. We used the iPerf3 software running on our test client computer connected to each router, so the test was independent of the ISP speed in our area.
Earning the top score of 6 out of 10, the Linksys Max Stream reigned supreme when it came to 2.4 GHz. speed. The Max Stream delivered an excellent job in our first assessment, having the average fastest throughput speed in our line-of-sight, short distance test — about 10' away. The Max Stream clocked in at an average of 57 Mbits/second.
The Max Stream continued its stellar performance in the obstructed version of the test, again delivering the highest throughput of the entire group with 57 Mbits/sec. It also delivered the best results in the unobstructed, medium distance test — about 35 feet away. However, it was dethroned in the obstructed medium distance, dropping to third place.
Finally, the Max Stream's performance dropped in the longest distance version of this test — about 70' separating the computer and router. It still scored close to the top of the pack, but it was eclipsed by the stellar performance of the ASUS RT-AC88U.
Finishing next, the RT-AC88U, Linksys AC1900, NETGEAR AC1750 R6400, Nighthawk AC1750, and the Nighthawk X10 all earned a 5 out of 10 for their overall solid performance. The RT-AC88U and the Linksys AC1900 were the top two scorers in the short distance, line of sight test, clocking in at 51 Mbits/s and 53 Mbits/s, respectively. They were followed by the 49 Mbits/s of the X10, 48 Mbit/s of the standard Nighthawk, and the 47 Mbits/s of the NETGEAR.
Performance for some of the routers changed dramatically in the obstructed version of the test, with the RT-AC88U and the NETGEAR's throughput dropping dramatically, while the remaining trio of routers remained relatively unchanged.
Moving on the medium distance tests, the scores somewhat inverted, with the X10 doing the best of the group in the line of sight test. This product was followed closely by the normal Nighthawk and then the Linksys AC1900. For the obstructed test, the Linksys AC1900 did the best of this group, followed by the Nighthawk X10.
For the long-distance test, the RT-AC88U not only did the best of this group but the best job of the entire bunch, measuring in at 27 Mbit/s. The Nighthawk AC1750 did the next best.
Next, the TP-Link Archer C7, the A6, the NETGEAR R6230, and the ASUS RT-AC68U each earned a 4 out of 10 for their overall so-so performances.
These routers all did an alright job with the short and medium distance tests but their throughput fell off for the long-distance test. All of these routers averaged in the 30-50 Mbits/s range in the short distance tests and dropped to the 20-40 Mbit/s in the medium distance test. This is a stark contrast to their performance in the 70' test, with the TP-Link models averaging around 9 Mbits/s, the ASUS RT-AC68U averaging 12.7 Mbit/s, and the NETGEAR R6230 only measuring an abysmal average of 2.3 Mbits/s.
At the back of the pack, both the D-Link and the NETGEAR R6220-100NAS earned a 3 out of 10 for their substandard performance. These models didn't impress us in the short and medium tests and essentially were unusable at long distances, dropping to a throughput rate of essentially 0 Mbit/s.
5 GHz. Throughput
For our next metric, we repeated the above set of tests for each router, using the 5 GHz. network. The data rate is usually much faster over a 5 GHz. network, but the signal attenuates rapidly, meaning the speed rapidly decreases as the distance between the router and the server increase.
Tying for first place overall in this metric, the RT-AC88U, the NETGEAR R6230, the Linksys AC1900 WRT1900ACS, and the NETGEAR R6220-100NAS all earned a 6 out of 10 for their showing. Both the RT-AC88U and the NETGEAR R6220-NAS impressed us with their great performance in the long-distance test, while the Linksys WRT1900ACS' results were a bit disappointing. The NETGEAR R6230 did about average.
While the X10 delivered the overall fastest 5 GHz. performance at a distance, it performed relatively poorly in the short and medium distance tests, dropping it out of the running for a top score in this metric.
Both of the NETGEAR routers outperformed the other two in this group in the obstructed range tests, both in the short and medium distance versions. The NETGEAR R6220-NAS had the edge in the short distance line of sight tests, while the Linksys AC1900 WRT1900ACS and the NETGEAR R6230 both did very well in the medium distance line of sight test.
Next, the D-Link, the TP-Link Archer A6, the Linksys Max Stream, the NETGEAR AC1750 R6400, the Nighthawk, and the Nighthawk X10 all earned a 5 out of 10 for their middle-of-the-road performance. As mentioned above, the X10 reigned supreme in the long-distance 5 GHz. test, recording an average throughput of 46 Mbits/s. However, it delivered an overall uninspiring set of results in the other four tests.
Of this group, the D-Link did the overall best of this group at the short distance obstructed test and the A6 did the best at the line-of-sight short distance test. The normal Nighthawk excelled in the medium distance tests — both obstructed and unobstructed.
Finally, the TP-Link Archer C7 and the ASUS RT-AC68U tied again, each earning a 4 out of 10, which was the lowest score of the group. The TP-Link did above average at the line of sight, short distance test, but was relatively unimpressive in the other tests. The ASUS RT-AC68U didn't do amazing in either short distance or the obstructed medium distance test and did exceptionally poorly in the line of sight, medium distance test compared to the rest of the router. However, the ASUS RT-AC68U redeemed itself slightly in the long-distance test, doing extremely well compared to the rest of the group and finishing not far off from the top products.
For the final metric of our review, we compared and scored the range of each wireless router. This metric accounts for the remaining 15% of the final score and is comprised of a single test. We measured out various distances, then played the same video to see if there were any buffering issues. We noted at what distance the video playback was interrupted for each wireless router, then used that to determine the scores.
The NETGEAR AC1750 R6400 delivering uninterrupted playback at a distance of over 200', earning it the top score of 7 out of 10 in this test. We successfully watched a 5-minute YouTube video in 720p without any buffering or interruptions when connected through this wireless router.
Next, the ASUS RT-AC88U, the ASUS RT-AC68U, the Nighthawk X10, the Nighthawk, and the Linksys AC1900 all earned a 5 out of 10 for their performance. The range of all of these products dropped dramatically compared to the NETGEAR wireless routers, with the video stream cutting out about 50'-60' closer.
Next, the D-Link, the TP-Link Archer C7, the Archer A6, and the NETGEAR R6220-100NAS all merited a 4 out of 10 for their efforts, having an effective range of about 145', 135', 135', and 143' in our tests, respectively. Rounding out the back of the pack, the Linksys AC1900 Max Stream earned a 2 out of 10 for its paltry range of just over a hundred feet and the NETGEAR R6230 earned a 1 out of 10 for its disappointing range of about 65' in our test.
Hopefully, this review has answered some of your questions about wireless routers and helped you find the perfect one for your needs.
— Austin Palmer, David Wise, and Jenna Ammerman