The 5 Best Bathroom Scales of 2024

Best Overall Scale

Wyze X

Standard Deviation: 0.11 lbs | Type: Smart

Scale Type	Digital
Standard Deviation i	0.11 lbs
Units of Measurement	Pounds Kilograms
Power Source	4 AAA Batteries
App?	Yes

The Wyze X is one of the most recent additions to our lineup, and this smart scale worked its way to the top by performing exceptionally well in every one of our testing metrics. Because sensors cover the entire surface, the X gave consistent readings throughout our tests, showing one of the lowest standard deviations of just .11 lbs over five rounds of body weight measurements. The scale offers the option to display weight in either pounds (up to 400) or kilograms. If you like to track your stats, for health reasons or just for fun, the X monitors 12 different body metrics and is compatible with health apps like Apple Health, Google Fit, and Fitbit, in addition to the Wyze Fitness Tracker. The scale has a baby mode so you can weigh your newborn (or furbaby), too. The display shows white LED-lit numbers and text on a white background, but our testers were impressed, mentioning that the “text is crisp and legible.” The entire device is 11.8" x 11.8", providing a sizable platform that is almost a full inch longer and wider than competing digital scales like the Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat. It has an ITO-coated glass platform that comes in black and white. It is easily storable at only 1.2 inches thick; you can slip it right under the countertop or even stand it on its side to store it under the bathroom sink.

While it is our highest scorer and overall winner, the Wyze X has a few small setbacks. As a digital scale, the X runs on 4 AAA batteries that must be replaced periodically. While not the biggest con, it is not as convenient as analog scales without a power source. The smart features allow you to track many metrics, but you must step onto the scale barefoot to get readings on many of them. We also found that the scale won't pick up anything under 13 pounds, so if you need to weigh light objects, you're better off with a kitchen scale. Unlike other digital models on our list, it also doesn't measure all of our British and Irish friends in stone. The Etekcity Smart ESB4074C does provide units in stones and also boasts a 40 lbs higher weight capacity, maxing out at 440 lbs (that's ~31.4 stone if you were wondering). If these two features are important to you, it is a good option to consider. If not, the Wyze X is a great smart scale to help you track and monitor many aspects of your overall health.

Best Bang for Your Buck

Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat

Standard Deviation: 0.20 lbs | Type: Smart

Scale Type	Digital
Standard Deviation i	0.20 lbs
Units of Measurement	Pounds Kilograms
Power Source	3 AAA Batteries
App?	Yes

The Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat is a sleek, easy-to-use digital smart scale with a great app and accurate overall performance; we found a standard deviation of just 0.2 lbs over a series of 5 bodyweight measurements. The 400 lb weight limit is on the higher end (although not as high as the 440 lbs limit on the EatSmart Precision Plus), so it can accommodate more users. Setup is a breeze, as it easily pairs with the app. This extra feature is one of our favorite features of this scale, tying with the Wyze X for the top score in our app evaluation tests. Our team describes the Renpho app as “very obvious and easy to navigate,” its host of smart features will quickly and easily get you up and running in your quest for fitness and health tracking. It offers wide platform compatibility and works with Samsung Health, Apple Health, Google Fit, and Fitbit. The scale is comparably priced to other smart models but can almost always be found at a discount from different retailers, so it may offer a more approachable price.

The Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat, while awesome, does have a few minor drawbacks that may or may not affect your buying decision. For instance, it does not display weight units in stones, which may affect Irish and British users. Additionally, the 11" x 11" platform is just average in size, so isn't the best choice for users with larger feet, and it won't take readings with socks on. Another equally worthy option is the Eufy Smart Scale C1. We consider the app for the Eufy to be almost as functional, with a host of similar features, and the overall measurement accuracy is a bit higher than the Renpho. However, minor caveats aside, the Renpho Body Fat is an exceptionally capable scale that will help you easily and accurately track your health and fitness journey.

Best Digital Scale

Etekcity EB9380H

Std. Deviation: 0.23 lbs | Type: Digital

The Etekcity EB9380H is a straightforward digital scale that we appreciate for its accuracy and simplicity. It is not a smart scale, so it does not offer the robust technological features of a connected app capable of extensive health-tracking functions, but for many users trying to simply get weight readings for their own health and fitness tracking, it fits the bill, and then some. In our tests for accuracy and precision, it earned marks on par with other top scorers like the Wyze X and the Eufy, showing a standard deviation of 0.23 lbs, and was especially accurate in our small item test, showing identical results over 5 rounds of tests weighing a 10 lb item. It is easy to set up, the design is modern and attractive, and the backlit display screen is clear and easy to read. Perhaps most importantly, it's an incredible value.

The accessible price of the Etekcity EB9380H does not mean you will have to compromise on precision or performance, but it does lack a few extra convenience features that some users may miss. It can display measurements in pounds or kilograms but is unable to display measurements in stones, so it may not be ideal if that is your preferred unit of measurement. If you are looking for a digital model that does measure in stones, the Etekcity Smart ESB4074C is another option that we liked from the same company. It is not quite as precise, but it offers additional units and has an app with more health-tracking features. However, if you simply want an easy and affordable way to check your weight every now and then, the high level of accuracy provided by the Etekcity EB9380H makes it an incredible value at the price point. This unit is sufficient for those looking for a basic digital scale and not a smart scale.

Best for FitBit Users

Fitbit Aria Air Smart

Std. Deviation: 0.33 lbs | Type: Smart

If you are a fan of the Fitbit ecosystem and already use one of their devices, then the Fitbit Aria Air Smart will be right up your alley. It integrates seamlessly with the technology you are already familiar with, making the addition of their scale a no-brainer. You will get to enjoy a large number of health-tracking options on the app, such as water consumption, exercise, and menstrual health. Many of which you may already be familiar with. We experienced some connectivity issues when first pairing the scale to the app, but once connected, we were ready to take full advantage of the features in combination with our app and a Fitbit device. In our precision tests, it was reasonably accurate, with a standard deviation of 0.33 lbs, which is better than average for the group (the best being the Wyze X at just 0.11 lbs). It's also one of the few models in our lineup that can be set to display in stones (as well as pounds and kilos), which is good news if that is your unit of choice.

While it's pretty clear that Aria Air Smart scale is an excellent pick for Fitbit users, it's fair to say it isn't the best option for those looking for a versatile smart scale. Most of the cool health tracking features are part of the app, and used as a standalone scale, we found the Aria to be pretty basic. You simply won't reap the benefits without wearing a Fitbit device and using the proprietary app. At the price point, there are other cross-compatible smart options that would be worth looking at instead, including the Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat and the C1 Smart Scale by Eufy. Neither of these alternatives will display weight in stones, but each is a low-cost, high-functioning product with more diverse compatibility. However, if the Fitbit platform is already a part of your fitness routine, the Air Smart is our recommendation for you.

Best Analog Scale

Adamson A27

Std. Deviation: 1.14 lbs | Type: Analog

The Adamson A27 is the best analog model we tested and is a great option for those interested in a no-fuss method to weigh themselves. It does not have the features or frills of either a smart or digital scale, but that might be a welcomed step back toward a less complicated world where you want to do a simpler level of health and fitness tracking through weight measurements alone. It doesn't require any batteries or setup; our testers summed up the entire process in just a few words: “Unbox, calibrate the scale by turning the dial to 0, and you are good to go! Easy peasy.” Texturized, anti-skid rubber keeps the platform stable even when the surface is wet, and the large size provides enough standing room for even our big-footed friends out there. For folks who aren't interested in an overly complicated product that requires the pairing of a smart device or even a digital scale that requires the occasional changing of batteries, this analog scale is a refreshingly simple choice for those looking to measure their weight with an uncomplicated, maintenance-free device.

If you are interested in making your health and fitness part of your daily digital realm, the A27 is not for you. It does not offer any tracking abilities and displays weight measurements with a needle dial exclusively in pounds (sorry, metric users). We were also less impressed with the accuracy of this scale. In our bodyweight measurement tests, it showed a standard deviation of 1.14 lbs over a series of 5 readings. This means that if you took two readings back to back, you may see a difference of over one pound in your results from one reading to the next, so if you prioritize precision in your measurements, you might want to check out some other models. Another simple option that we think you'll appreciate is the Etekcity EB9380H. It offers a simple, easy-to-read digital display without a litany of other tech enhancements but is easier to store than the Adamson, offers users the ability to switch the display units to kilos, and, most importantly, has one of the best accuracy scores in the group. However, if you are ok with some minor fluctuations in your weight measurements and like to keep your life as simple and streamlined as possible, then the Adamson A27 is our favorite analog scale.

Compare Products

Compare select up to 5 products to compare

	Score	Product	Price
	88	Wyze X Best Overall Scale	$34
	81	Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat Best Bang for Your Buck	$40
	81	Eufy Smart Scale C1	$30
	77	Etekcity EB9380H Best Digital Scale	$20
	77	Etekcity Smart ESB4074C	$22
	71	Fitbit Aria Air Smart Best for FitBit Users	$50
	69	EatSmart Precision Plus	$40
	68	Inevifit I-BS002S	$90
	64	Taylor Precision Digital	$35
	58	Adamson A27 Best Analog Scale	$45
	39	Conair Thinner Extra Large	$45

How We Test Scales

To evaluate bathroom scales, our test team designed and implemented a set of tests to assess each model's ability to deliver weight results accurately and precisely, using different objects of predefined mass throughout the process. Our team not only performed tests to capture raw statistical data, but we also set up evaluative tests to see how usable the data collected by smart scales via their respective apps would prove to be. We looked at how easy and intuitive these associated fitness-tracking apps and digital scale displays are to use. And we assessed the practicality and usability of more simple analog scales for comparison. We even looked at how easy each model is to set up and stow away when through.

Through testing, we learned which models were great for simply taking a weight measurement alone, which digital models were great for large and easy-to-see displays, and which smart models provide the most robust health tracking metrics, so that our team could provide the top recommendations for your needs.

Our testing is divided across four key rating metrics:

• Accuracy and Precision (40% of overall score weighting)

• Ease of Use (35% weighting)

• Features and Storing (15% weighting)

• App (10% weighting)

Why Trust GearLab

Long-time gear aficionados Austin Palmer and Genaveve Bradshaw both took unique paths into their roles as testers for GearLab, developing in-depth analytical, problem-solving, and gear-assessment skills at every step along the way. Austin's route carried him from a B.S. in Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University to months of long-distance hiking along the Appalachian (AT) and Pacific Crest Trails (PCT), with a stop to try his hand at operating heavy machinery in Texas in between. Genaveve is a classically trained musician and avid outdoor enthusiast with a degree in music and psychology from the University of New Mexico. She has spent years in dedicated practice to both her sport and artistic pursuits, including time as a competitive rock climbing coach and routesetter. Together, these two possess a deep understanding of the core fundamentals of objective research, in addition to a wealth of personal experience, industry insight, and technical product knowledge in each category they undertake. They now apply this broad expertise to formulating comprehensive test plans for GearLab, including their evaluation of all scales in this lineup, each carefully selected from among the most promising models on the market today.

Analysis and Test Results

Our test team examined accuracy and precision, user-friendliness, the presence and quality of smart features like apps, any value additive features, and lastly, the storability of each scale. We compared them to one another and used each to monitor health and track fitness.

What's the Best Value?

To find the best value in a bathroom scale, there are several factors to consider. Firstly, it is important to determine your specific needs and preferences. You will want to consider whether you require additional features such as body composition analysis, connectivity to apps or devices, a large display, or want a more simple analog scale to simply take a weight measurement. Deciding on your base requirements upfront will help you identify which one of the many great scales we tested will best meet your expectations, but also fit nicely within your budget.

The old adage “You get what you pay for” is becoming more obscured with incredibly affordable manufacturing processes and highly affordable, yet still complex, electronics. When it comes to a bathroom scale, you do not need to compromise on accuracy and quality to find a balance between affordability and quality. In the world of smart scales, we found the Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat to not only be incredibly capable but also very budget-friendly, and in the world of digital scales, the Etekcity EB9380H stood out for its easy setup, a great degree of accuracy, ease of use, and a very low price point. The Etekcity Smart ESB4074C also comes at a similarly low price point, but you'll only get weight and BMI readings. Contrary to what you might expect, the analog scales we tested are actually among the more expensive models we tested, which may still present a good value if you desire simplicity.

Accuracy and Precision

The importance of precision and accuracy of bathroom scales is fundamental for reliable health monitoring and tracking. Accuracy ensures that the measurements provided by the scale provide trustworthy data for decisions related to diet, exercise, and overall lifestyle adjustments. Precision, on the other hand, ensures that the scale delivers consistent measurements over time, allowing users to track small changes in weight that could indicate progress toward fitness goals, potential health issues, or the effectiveness of a dietary or fitness regimen. Therefore, both accuracy and precision are essential for a bathroom scale to function as a valuable tool in maintaining and improving individual health and well-being. Given the obvious importance of accuracy and precision, the scores from this test metric have accounted for 40% of each product's overall score.

Our precision and accuracy tests followed a strict set of procedures using known weights. These procedures included the tester wearing the same outfit and having bare feet while weighing themselves five times, allowing 5 minutes of time between each weighing, and standing in the same location on the scale every time. We also restricted the use of the bathroom, eating snacks, or drinking liquids during these weighings to maintain consistency.

That procedure was repeated for additional testing while we held a 10-pound weight for three rounds to detect noticeable increases and a 3-pound weight for minor gains. Lastly, a similar procedure was performed by weighing a 10-pound black ball on its own three times with 5 minutes between each weighing. We then found the standard deviation for each of these tests and compared accuracy that way. Products with the smallest amount of deviation had the most consistent measurements through each round of testing and received the highest scores. A couple of models stood out from the rest for their excellent precision and accuracy.

Standard Deviation of Weight Tests

Product	Body Weight	Body Weight w/ Object	Object
Eufy Smart Scale C1	0.20	0.00	0.00
Wyze X	0.11	0.00	0.12
Inevifit I-BS002S	0.18	0.12	0.00
Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat	0.20	0.12	0.00
EatSmart Precision Plus	0.26	0.12	0.00
Etekcity EB9380H	0.23	0.15	0.12
Etekcity Smart ESB4074C	0.34	0.12	0.06
Taylor Precision Digital	0.30	0.35	0.12
Fitbit Aria Air Smart	0.33	0.58	0.00
Adamson A27	1.14	0.58	0.58
Conair Thinner Extra Large	1.79	1.15	1.15

The Eufy Smart Scale C1 narrowly led the pack with a near-perfect score for the metric. Specifically, the Eufy had zero deviation in recorded weights in the human + heavyweight and object tests. When measuring body weight, we found a relatively low level of deviation at just 0.2 lbs. The Wyze X and the Inevifit I-BS002S were hot on the heels of the Eufy Smart Scale C1, and both offered nearly as accurate measurements with very minor standard deviations.

If precision matters most to you, then you'll want to take a look at those top models, but the Fitbit Aria Air Smart and Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat also offered incredibly accurate data. The Air Smart shows no deviation in three of our 5 tests (the bodyweight + light weight, the object test, and the small item test, if you were curious). The Renpho was most accurate when measuring basic human weight or an object alone. Both had very small standard deviations in measurements overall — which is fortunate for Fitbit users and users looking at the Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat to save some money. Lastly, the Etekcity EB9380H was another top scorer, performing well above average in all but the small object test. So, if you regularly need to weigh items that are in the ten-pound range, it might not be the best choice for you.

By no means were any scales inaccurate; they simply didn't have as small a standard deviation in our testing as the top models. However, the two analog models we tested produced the largest deviations, and it was evident in our testing that the digital and smart scales are more precise than the analog ones.

Ease of Use

Ease of use is a significant factor when it comes to bathroom scales. Ideally, these products should be simple to operate, with clear and readable displays and straightforward functionality. Overly complex scales can lead to misinterpretations of readings, which can result in incorrect health assessments. Moreover, if a scale is difficult to use, people might be less inclined to use it regularly, thus limiting its potential benefits for ongoing health monitoring. User-friendly scales can accommodate a wide range of users, including those less comfortable with complex technology. Given its importance when looking for a bathroom scale, this metric comprises 35% of the overall score of each model. We took a look at the setup process, the size and clarity of the display and the type of platform when evaluating this metric.

At the top of our product lineup, the Adamson A27 proved to be the easiest model to use. As an analog model it is fairly straightforward, and a large display with a red high-contrast needle makes taking readings about as easy as looking at large digital numbers. Initial setup involves calibration, which is easily done via the taring dial. Its standing area for taking readings is also quite large, so you won't need to do any balancing acts to get an accurate reading.

The Etekcity EB9380H, a digital model, also stood out above the majority of models we tested for its ease of use. Namely, unboxing and setup are simple. A protective strip simply needs to be removed from pre-loaded batteries, and the model we tested needed no calibration. A digital backlit screen lights up with an attractive blue color and is a decent size, making it easy to read the black high-contrast numbers on the display. We found the Wyze X was also easy to use and read. It fits most feet with a dimension of 11.8" x 11.8", and we enjoyed the feeling of the coated glass platform beneath our feet.

While it doesn't affect day-to-day use, the weight capacity of your scale may impact your buying decision. We found that there is a pretty wide range (over 100 lbs!) between different brands. The Conair Thinner Extra Large maxes out at 330 lbs, and both the Etekcity and the Eatsmart feature a much higher 440 lb max capacity. Note that if you plan to weigh luggage, you'll have to take into account your body weight plus the ~50 lb weight limit that many airlines have on checked baggage.

Ease of Use Submetric Ratings

Product	Setup	Display	Platform
Conair Thinner Extra Large	10	7	10
Adamson A27	10	6	10
Etekcity EB9380H	9	8	9
Wyze X	6	9	9
Etekcity Smart ESB4074C	8	8	7
EatSmart Precision Plus	7	10	5
Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat	7	8	7
Eufy Smart Scale C1	5	8	7
Taylor Precision Digital	9	3	8
Inevifit I-BS002S	8	5	7
Fitbit Aria Air Smart	4	4	7

While the more complicated smart scales we tested are obviously disadvantaged by their additional features, app setup, and Bluetooth pairing, the EatSmart Precision Plus and the Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat both earned above-average scores compared to the entire test group for their easy and intuitive setup and great display screens. These are worth considering if you are in the market for an easy-to-use smart scale.

Features and Storing

For our third major test metric, features and storing, we evaluated and rated each model's features and storability. For features, we specifically examined the ability to tare each model and the number of units each model displays. IE: Pounds, Kilograms, and Stones. For the storage portion of the metric, we looked at the general size and weight of each scale and whether or not models could be stored on their side. Features and storage scores contribute to 15 percent of each scale's overall score. Below are some of the features available in the top-performing scales in this metric. In general, digital scales tend to score better in this area.

The Wyze X stood out from other models in this metric for a clean and clear on-scale display along with its many body composition measurements. These include weight, BMI, heart rate, basal metabolic rate, protein, and more. It can be set up for eight different users and recognizes who steps on the scale. It also includes a variety of 'modes' if you want to weigh more than just yourself, like luggage, your pet, or your baby. Additionally, its streamlined shape makes it particularly easy to store.

The Fitbit Aria Air Smart followed our leader with an ability to display in three units of weight: pounds, kilos, and stones, and can also be adjusted to display BMI and body fat percentage. It's also capable of tracking up to eight user accounts. The thin design has rounded corners, which allows it to easily slide in and out of tight storage spaces when not being used.

The Eufy Smart Scale C1 and the Inevifit I-BS002S both trailed these models with above-average scores for the metric. Both are limited to displaying weights in pounds and kilograms and are limited in features on the scales themselves. Still, the Eufy Smart Scale C1 also has an accompanying smart app that expands its abilities for much more advanced health and fitness tracking.

App

Our fourth test metric, Apps, accounts for 10% of each product's overall score and primarily focuses on the five most intelligent products in our test lineup. Specifically, we evaluated an available app's interface and health-tracking features and weighted each submetric equally. Of course, our scoring system takes into account an unfairness if a scale has no smart features by design, as is the case with analog scales, and we have been careful to make a minor normalization to our collected data to balance those less intelligent models scores, without adversely affecting our data-driven results.

App Submetric Ratings

Product	Interface	Health Tracking
Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat	9	9
Wyze X	9	9
Eufy Smart Scale C1	9	8
Etekcity Smart ESB4074C	8	7
Fitbit Aria Air Smart	8	5

Of the smart scales we tested, the Wyze X, Renpho Bluetooth Body Fat, and Eufy Smart Scale C1 all stood out as truly exceptional and tied with nearly perfect scores for their robust and intuitive interfaces. However, the Wyze X and Renpho out-scored the Eufy by both tracking 13 health metrics—from weight and BMI to bone mass, protein, and body water—while the Eufy tracks 12 health metrics. The difference, while minor, was enough to identify a top model.

The Etekcity Smart ESB4074C is also a notable performer here, as the app is easy to navigate with accessible information. That said, we wished it had offered more tracking capabilities like the others instead of just a weight log. We also found the meal-planning portion of inputting foods to be finicky at times.

The Fitbit Aria Air Smart also earned a fairly average overall score for having a great interface, but did not perform as well as the others when it came to health tracking abilities. Users can leverage the app to manually log water consumption, exercise, mindfulness, food, and menstrual health. However, these features have little to do with the scale itself and do not set it apart from different health-tracking apps you can get.

Given their lack of smart features or an app, the rest of the basic digital and analog products we tested received mathematically normalized scores.

How to Pick the Best Scale for You

You may be someone who wants to meticulously track their exercises and organize your goals, whether that be to lean down or to build up additional muscle mass. Or it's possible that you want to keep your weight in check for other health related factors. Maybe you just want to know if your checked bag is too heavy to make it past the airport check-in counter. If you fall into any of these categories or somewhere in between, it sounds like you need a scale. With the variety of options we included in our lineup, one of them is sure to fulfill your needs, but how do you know which one is the best fit for you?

Smart Scales

These units come with a smart app that often has tracking abilities that allow you to monitor your weight and BMI over time, determine hydration levels, and input food and water intake each day. Some of them can even connect to your fitness tracker, such as the Wyze X or Fitbit Aria Air Smart so you can incorporate your exercise routine into your array of stats. Some come with cool features that allow you to weigh different objects you are holding, whether that is luggage, a pet, or your child. A few have memories and can recognize different users when they step on the scale. Even baseline smart scales at least come with meal and BMI tracking. If you're detail-oriented, tech-forward, and like to keep track of your progress, you'll likely want a smart scale.

Digital Scales

Digital scales are another common option these days. They typically have an electronic display screen that shows your weight when you step on the surface. Sometimes, they have a backlit display screen and the ability to tare, but they are pretty cut and dried beyond that. Digital models are much simpler and often more cost-effective than those with smart capabilities while also tending to be more accurate than analog scales. If you simply want to step on the platform and trust that the weight you see is true, we recommend this type of scale.

Analog Scales

These devices may not always be the most accurate, but they are acceptable for most users and are some of the cheapest scales you can find. With an analog scale, you also won't need to replace the batteries, and the setup only requires a quick unboxing. It is sometimes the case that the display on analog scales is easier to read as well. You don't need to worry if your display screen has the right amount of contrast or backlighting. If you value simplicity and are budget-minded, we highly recommend purchasing an analog scale. Just step on, step off, and go on with your day.

Conclusion

Whether you are trying to drop a few pounds or need to weigh your suitcases before boarding your next flight, a fuss-free (and accurate) scale is essential. We hope our comprehensive testing and evaluation of the top options on the market provides you with enough information to better understand the types of scales, the range of technologies, and even device compatibility that exists today. Armed with the right information, you will be able to identify which scale, whether a smart, digital, or analog scale, is the best fit for you, your lifestyle, and your health and wellness goals.

For other health and hygiene essentials, you can also check out our review of thermometers, electric toothbrushes, and razors available today.