We spent hundreds of hours researching, using, and abusing a wide array of the most compelling air purifiers of 2019, all to find the most effective air cleaning solution for your home. We tested all of these purifiers side-by-side in smoke-filled rooms to assess their relative air cleaning power in a more easily comparable manner. We also used all of them in our homes, during the day and at night, to see how the noise each emits affected our daily activities and sleep. Whether you just need a small, inexpensive model to keep your bedroom air clear at night or want something more powerful for your main living area, we've found a model that will suit your needs.
The Best Air Purifiers of 2019
$163.00 at Amazon
$229.00 at Amazon
$129.99 at Amazon
$79.99 at Amazon
$169.99 at Amazon
|Pros||Excellent air cleaning performance, quiet operation, average lifetime cost||Good air cleaning performance, seperate air quality meter, quiet||Good air cleaning performance, very quiet, simple to use||Quiet, low operating costs||Good air cleaning performance, quiet operation|
|Cons||Expensive up front cost||Expensive upfront cost, no CADR rating||Somewhat expensive filters||Somewhat weak||Lifetime cost similar to better performing models|
|Bottom Line||A top performing model that combines average lifetime costs to create a great value||Easy to use and powerful, great for those dealing with common pollen and pet allergies||A high performing purifier at a mid range price||Quiet and relatively inexpensive, but feels a bit underpowered||A decent performer, but can get better performance for the same price elsewhere|
|Rating Categories||Coway AP-1512HH||TruSens Z-2000||GermGuardian AC5350B||Levoit LV-H132||Levoit LV-PUR131|
|Air Cleaning Performance (40%)|
|Ease Of Use (25%)|
|Operating Cost (10%)|
|Specs||Coway AP-1512HH||TruSens Z-2000||GermGuardian AC5350B||Levoit LV-H132||Levoit LV-PUR131|
|Dimensions||16.5" x 9.5" x 18.5"||12.6" x 11.6" x 25.4"||9.06" x 6.69" x 27.56"||7.5" x 7.5" x 13"||14.5" x 7.25" x 18.5"|
|Weight||12.7 lb||7.4 lb||11.25 lb||8.45 lb||11.4 lb|
|CADR||240 CFM||N/A||125 CFM||110 CFM||135 CFM|
|Estimated Lifetime Cost||$556||$548||$542||$323||$589|
|Airborne Particulate Reduction After 1 Hour (%)||99.84%||99.85%||99.50%||95.66%||99.30%|
Best Overall Air Purifier
For those that want to wage all out war against pollen and other airborne particulates, the Coway AP-1512HH will be the strongest weapon in your arsenal. In just 30 minutes it was able to remove 99.3% of the airborne particles from our 150 square foot testing room. This was more particle reduction than most other models were able to achieve over an entire hour. To boot the Coway's fan is both powerful enough to keep things cool during those sweltering summer nights, and quiet enough to not drown out your next Netflix marathon. We also like that the accurate, built-in air quality meter lets the machine autonomously turn on and off as needed.
The only real hurdle we ran into with the Coway was its cost. The list price is quite steep. However, the Coway does have less expensive filters and uses electricity more economically than most models, so in the long run you end with average costs. If you can make the investment upfront, the Coway gives you top notch performance with a reasonable lifetime cost.
Read review: Coway AP-1512HH
Some air purifiers use ionizers to produce charged particles that stick to dust and pollen, making them easier to trap in a filter. However, these ionizers are somewhat controversial as there are many claims that they can produce ozone, which is a harmful lung irritant. Many manufacturers claim that their ionizers are ozone free, but in cases such as these we take the conservative route. Therefore we only tested models that can be run without an ionizer.
Best Buy on a Tight Budget
If you're looking for the most air cleaning power per dollar, the GermGuardian AC4300BPTCA is the clear frontrunner. It removed an impressive 99.39% of airborne particulates in our testing room over the course of an hour, despite generally selling for around far less than most competitors. Its fan also makes a relatively innocuous noise, and it won't add too much to your electric bill.
Really the only realistic complaint one could levy against the AC4300BPTCA is that it doesn't have an air quality meter. However, that would be a lot to expect given this model's price. Also, while the fan is quieter than average and the air cleaning performance is above average, the AC4300BPTCA is not the best in either of those categories. Those that are very sensitive to noise or live in areas with particularly bad air quality may benefit from making a bigger investment in the Coway. For most people, however, the AC4300BPTCA offers a near perfect balance of performance and price.
Read review: GermGuardian AC4300BPTCA
Best Bang for the Buck
If you want all the bells and whistles of a top shelf purifier, but don't want to make the initial investment required by the Coway, the GermGuardian AC5350B would be a worthy substitute. It's packed with features like an on/off timer, 5 fan speed settings, and a UV bulb that is meant to kill bacteria. It also performed quite well in our air cleaning tests, achieving a 99.5% particulate reduction after 1 hour. And it does all this without the same sticker shock as the Coway.
While the AC5350B does have a more attractive upfront cost, its filters are quite expensive. In the long term it ends up costing about the same as the Coway, so we would still suggest going with the Coway if you don't mind spending more initially.
Read review: GermGuardian AC5350B
Top Pick for Small Rooms
Most people only really need an air purifier for their bedroom, and if your bedroom is on the small side (~100 square feet) the GermGuardian AC4100 is an inexpensive and effective way to get rid of pollen while you sleep. Our testing indicated that it has enough power to get airborne particulate out of small rooms, and it is nearly silent on its low fan setting. Combine that with a super simple interface and you've got a great machine to fight the pollen all summer long.
The AC4100 is noticeably less powerful than other purifiers, so even when used in a small room you'll likely want to run it for an hour or so before you go to be to get the full effect. It can also get a bit loud when set on the medium or high settings. If you can live with those minor flaws, we think this is the best and most economical purifier available for small rooms.
Read review: GermGuardian AC4100
Unique Detachable Air Quality Monitor
Offering great performance that nearly earned it an Editors' Choice Award, the TruSens Z-2000 sets itself apart from the rest of the field with a separate air quality sensor that can be placed away from the purifier itself (this sensor communicates with the purifier wirelessly, but must be plugged into an outlet). This allows you to place the sensor on your bedstand or next to your favorite chair, prompting the purifier to react to the quality of the air that you're actually breathing, not just the air immediately surrounding it. It backs this feature up wit quiet operation, a user friendly interface, and reasonable operating costs given its performance.
Apart from fairly hefty upfront cots, our only real qualms with the TruSens are that it was slightly less effective at removing odors than the top-scoring Coway in our tests, and that it hasn't received a clean air delivery rate (CADR) certification. However, our tests indicate that it is very effective at removing airborne allergens (generally 2.5 microns and above), and thus would likely be a great choice for those seeking relief from pollen.
Read review: TruSens Z-2000
Why You Should Trust Us
Authors Steven Tata and Max Mutter have spent the last three years researching and testing a variety of health and wellness products including air purifiers, humidifiers, electric toothbrushes, and fitness trackers. They've also tested a myriad of other home and kitchen products, from security cameras and wireless speakers to toaster ovens and pressure cookers.
In finding the best purifier for every home, we kept things as controlled and scientific as possible. We used a professional grade air quality meter to measure airborne particulate concentrations, and tested all of the purifiers in the same 150 square foot room to keep conditions as consistent as possible. To choose the models that made it into this air quality sanctum, we researched over 100 of the best on the market before whittling it down to the 13 most promising. We then spent over 200 hours testing, not only in our air quality chamber, but also assessing user friendliness, measuring noise levels, and calculating operating costs.
Related: How We Tested Air Purifiers
Analysis and Test Results
When used correctly air purifiers can potentially bring some much-needed relief to the everyday symptoms of airborne allergy sufferers and those with sensitive respiratory systems. After conducting extensive research we bought and tested 10 of the best models on the market and put them through a stringent series of tests so that you can decide which will serve you best.
When it comes to air purifiers, you generally have to pay more for better power, capacity, and features. However, a big pricetag doesn't always mean you're getting the best products. The Coway outperformed multiple models in the higher-end price range, despite a middle-tier price tag. If you don't need top shelf performance and aren't fussed about extra features, the GermGuardian AC4300BPTCA and AC4100 both offer good performance at relatively low prices.
When shopping for an air purifier don't forget to factor in the cost of replacement filters and electricity usage. Some models that are less expensive upfront, like the GermGuardian AC5350B, end up burning the same amount of cash in the long run as the top performing Coway.
Air Cleaning Performance
Our most heavily weighted metric, air cleaning performance is the end-all-be-all for air purifiers. In our testing we sealed up a 150 square foot room, then filled it with smoke by burning incense, matches, and paper. Once we got the room to the desired level of airborne particulate pollution, we placed each purifier into the smokey torture chamber for an hour, monitoring the air cleaning progress with a Dylos air quality meter. Our tests focused on the elimination of airborne particles sized 2.5 microns and up. This size range corresponds to the vast majority of airborne allergens including most pet dander, mold, and pollen. We chose to focus here because we've found most people seeking out our review are doing so in search of allergy relief. While all the models we tested also eliminated much smaller particles as well, those particles tend to be more problematic to those with more serious respiratory afflictions. If you fit into this category, we feel you should consult a healthcare professional before choosing a purifier.
A slew of four different models shared the top score of 8 out of 10 in our air cleaning performance testing. First up is the Editors' Choice winning Coway AP-1512HH. It managed to rid our testing room of more than 99% of its large airborne particles in just half an hour, and got that reduction close to zero after a full hour. While none of the models we tested were particularly good at removing odors, the Coway made more of a dent than most.
The Blueair Pure 211 actually achieved a slightly larger particle reduction than the Coway in our test (the difference was marginal, but measurable). However, it failed to leapfrog the Coway because the lack of a carbon filter meant it barely affected the odors in the room at all.
Also in the group of top scorers, the Honeywell True HEPA Allergen Remover cleared well over 99% of the large airborne particles from the testing room after half an hour, but it's total reduction after an hour was just a bit behind that of the above models. Its odor reduction was on par with that of the Coway.
Rounding out the top scorers the Winix 9500 met the standard of reducing large particle counts by 99% in the first half hour and getting close to zero in the latter half of the hour. Its odor reducing performance was higher than average, but not field leading.
Falling just behind the top scorers with a 7 out fo 10, the TruSens Z-2000. It generally matched the top models in our tests, hitting a 99% reduction after half an hour and getting close to eliminating all large particle before 1 hour had passed. It also did better at removing the smoke odor than most. However, it doesn't have a CADR certification, something all of the top scorers possess.
The majority of the models we tested fell either at the top or the bottom of the air cleaning performance spectrum, with the Levoit LV-PUR131 the lonely occupant of the average, middle ground. After running for 30 minutes the Levoit LV-PUR131 had reduced particulate concentration by about 85%, which was far off from what the top scorers achieved in the same time frame. After an hour that figure bumped up to 99%, which feels acceptable, but still wasn't as good as the 99.9% figures the top scorers produced. It also removed more of the smoke odor than most other models, but a strong smell still remained.
Both the GermGuardian AC4300BPTCA and the GermGuardian AC5350B performed very similarly to the Levoit. These models were slightly faster out of the gate, both hitting around a 95% reduction in particulates by the half-hour mark, and both improving to over 99% by after a full hour. Both these models and the Levoit would be able to remove the vast majority of particulates if you were to run them in your bedroom overnight, but would likely never get the air quite as clean as the top scorers.
About half of the models we tested were not able to achieve a 99% reduction of airborne particulates within the allotted 1-hour window. The best of these underachieving models was the Dyson Pure Cool Link. It came out of the gate somewhat strong, hitting an 87% reduction after a half hour, but that progress petered out eventually, posting only a 97% reduction after an hour. IT was also the least effective model we tested in terms of odor elimination. The PureZone 3-in-1 started slow and ended slow, reducing airborne particulates by 77% and 93.6% at the half and full hours marks, respectively.
Two of the smaller units we tested, the GermGuardian AC4100 and the Levoit LV-H132, only achieved a 95% reduction after an hour in our smokey testing room. While those figures aren't;'t impressive, both models would likely be able to help out an allergy sufferer sleeping in a 150 square foot bedroom. However, we definitely wouldn't recommend them for larger rooms.
The worst performers in our air cleaning tests were the Holmes HEPA Type Desktop and the Hamilton Beach TrueAir. Both of these models failed to hit a 90% reduction after an hour of cleaning, and both really struggled to remove any of the smoke odor in the room. Granted, both of these units are small, but the equally small GermGuardian AC4100 was significantly more effective.
You're almost certainly going to want to place your air purifier right in the areas where you spend the most time, which means any odd noises they make could become a constant annoyance. For the most part we found all of our purifiers to be fairly quiet: we never got more than a 61 decibel reading on our meter, which is right around normal conversational level. However, even fairly quiet sounds can be annoying if they're high-pitched. So we spent at least a few hours working on our computers right next to each purifier running on high to access which noises blissfully melted into the background, and which continued to grate at our nerves before we finally acquiesced to the madness and shut the darn thing off.
For those that are particularly sensitive to noise, the GermGuardian AC5350B would be our top recommendation. We really had to strain to hear it when on its lowest setting, and even on the highest setting all that is audible is a relatively innocuous, low-pitched hum.
The TruSens Z-2000 is another model that manages to remain fairly innocuous to the ears. It's the lowest setting is virtually silent,t and even when cranked up to turbo mode it produces a fairly low pitched, almost white noise machine-esque hum.
Another option for those with sensitive ears, the Coway AP-1512HH is almost silent when run on its low setting. When you crank it up high it generally manages to remain in the innocuous, low-pitched genre, though it is just a bit higher pitched than the field-leading GermGuardian AC5350B.
Also sitting atop our noise scoreboard are the PureZone 3-in-1 and the Levoit LV-H132. Again, these models are practically silent when on the low setting, and on the highest settings are audible but not grating. It should also be noted that these units are smaller than the Coway and GermGuardian and thus have less powerful fans.
A slew of models scored just below the top step in our noise testing. The Levoit LV-PUR131's high setting produces a low-pitched hum, similar to that of the top scoring models, but on low it is a bit louder than the nearly silent low settings of models like the Coway. The Winix 9500 has a nearly silent low setting, but its high setting has a more medium pitched sound, making it a bit more noticeable. The Blueair Pure 211 keeps a low rumble that blends into the background when on its highest setting, but that low rumble seems to be just as noticeable when you turn it down to its lowest setting.
Just behind the top contenders in our noise testing was the Hamilton Beach TrueAir. On high it emits a fairly low pitched hum that can mostly fade into the background, but not completely. On low it is quiet, but still much more noticeable than the top performers.
The two average performers in our noise testing were the Holmes HEPA Type Desktop and the Dyson Pure Cool Link. The Holmes was fairly average across the board in our testing. At high settings it produced a buzzing sound that was hard to ignore, but not completely annoying. At low settings it creates a medium pitched hum that isn't too loud, but definitely noticeable. The Dyson was almost completely silent on low settings, but at high settings the fan emits a higher pitched roar that is hard not to notice, and may even make you click up the volume a few notches on the TV.
Two different models tied for the bottom slot in our noise testing. Both GermGuardian models that we tested, the AC4100 belched out a high pitch when used on their highest setting that is quite hard to ignore. On their low setting the pitch got a bit lower and less grating but was still very noticeable. The Honeywell True HEPA Allergen Remover produced and even louder high pitched noise on its high setting, but was slightly quieter on its low setting.
Ease of Use
Though air purifiers are generally simple and require no real maintenance beyond replacing the filter periodically. However, there are certain touches that can make day to day use a bit more enjoyable. Variable fan modes let you dial down the noise if you're watching TV. Remote controls let you do that without even leaving the couch. Handles and wheels make it easy to move the purifier around if you want it to follow you from the living room and into the bedroom. Timers keep you from forgetting to turn the purifier off when you leave the house.We evaluated all these aspects of our to purifiers to ascertain how easy they are to operate and incorporate into your daily routine.
Both the Coway AP-152HH and the Levoit LV-PUR131 provided similarly user-friendly experiences in our testing. These models both have streamlined control panels, convenient carry handles, and air quality sensors that allow the machines to automatically kick in when the air quality gets back, and power down to save energy when the quality gets better. Both models also weigh about 12 pounds, light enough to move around without too much hassle. Of the two we have a slight preference for the Coway as we found its air quality meter to be slightly more accurate. The Levoit's air quality meter is still accurate enough to be useful, but we would be more likely to use that feature on the Coway.
We also found the GermGuardian AC5350B to be very user-friendly. The control panel is simple and intuitive, it is on the lighter side at just over 11 pounds, and it has an automatic off timer, so you won't be wasting electricity if you forget to turn it off when you leave the house.
The TruSens Z-2000 also offers a sleek user interface, along with a unique detachable air quality meter. This meter must be plugged into a wall, but can communicate with the purifier wirelessly. This allows its auto mode to react to the air quality of wherever you place the sensor (say on a nightstand) instead of the air right next to the purifier. This can provide some nice peace of mind. At 7.4 pounds it is also quite easy to move from room to room.
Slightly behind the top scorers were three models that we felt were quite easy to use, but did have some minor drawbacks. The Dyson Pure Cool Link is easy to set up, incredibly light, has 10 different fan speeds, and a convenient remote control. However, the purifier itself only has an on/off button, so if you lose that remote you lose quite a bit of functionality. The Honeywell True HEPA Allergen Remover has a clean interface and all the bells and whistles, but at 17 pounds it is one of the least portable of the bunch. The GermGuardian AC4100 is very simple and compact, and user friendly, but only has 3 fan speeds and does not have an automatic off timer. The GermGuardian AC4300BPTCA has incredibly simple and easy to use controls but lacks an auto-off timer.
The Holmes HEPA Type Desktop was just a bit harder to deal with than the Blueair, but still wasn't frustrating to use. At 4.7 pounds it is very portable and is ready to go out of the box. However, the plastic knobs used to adjust the fan speed and ionizer feel a bit cheap and flimsy, and it only has three fan settings. The Levoit LV-H132's user experience is similar. It is small and light at 6.5 pounds and easy to setup, but it only has 3 fan settings and no extra features like an off timer.
The Winix 9500 and the Hamilton Beach TrueAir were both at the bottom of our ease of use scoresheet. Purifiers are quite simple machines, so even these models weren't particularly difficult to operate, but they were a bit less streamlined than the other models. The Winix's controls were comparatively cumbersome to use. We didn't find the odor and air quality meters to be accurate. Accessing full functionality requires the remote control, which is fairly well designed. Also, at 18 pounds and with no carry handles, the Winix was our least favorite model to carry around. The Hamilton Beach TrueAir was the only model that required some actual assembly out of the box, but it was fairly simple. It has only three fan speeds controlled with a dial that feels somewhat flimsy. It is, however, very light and portable.
It's easy to forget that you're going to have to pay for replacement filters and electricity costs throughout the lifetime of your air purifier. Measured every purifier's energy consumption and price checked all of their replacement filters to estimate how much each will end up costing in the long run. Our lifetime cost calculations assumed the national average for electricity cost ($0.12/kWh), average usage of 12 hours a day, filters being replaced according to manufacturer recommendations, and a functioning lifetime of 5 years.
Not surprisingly, the smallest model we tested proved to also be the most economical. The Holmes HEPA Type Desktop uses electricity very efficiently, utilizes small and inexpensive filters, and costs very little upfront. This results in an estimated lifetime cost fo just $143.
Far behind the Holmes in term of estimated lifetime cost was the GermGuardian AC4100. With average electricity economy and fairly inexpensive filters, we estimated its lifetime cost at $294. The Levoit LV-H132 followed behind with an estimated lifetime cost of $323. The PureZone 3-in-1 was still in this ballpark, logging an estimated lifetime cost of $279.
Most of the models we tested fell into the $500-$600 range when it came to estimated lifetime cost. The Levoit LV-PUR131 is very economical when it comes to electricity usage, but a middle of the road list price and relatively expensive filters pushed the estimated lifetime cost to $549. The TruSens Z-2000 costs a bit more upfront, but sips electricity and uses fairly inexpensive filters, pushing its estimated lifetime cost to $548. The Editors' Choice winning Coway AP-151HH also uses very little electricity, but the high list price and slightly above average filter costs led to an estimated lifetime cost of $556. The GermGuardian AC5350B is quite cheap up front, but due to the very expensive filters will end up costing you $542 in the long run. The Hamilton Beach TrueAir uses a filter with a relatively short life span, pushing its long-term costs up to $573. The Winix 9500 costs a lot up front but has very cheap filters, which balances to a lifetime cost of $591.
A few models garnered far above average estimated lifetime costs. Because none of these models were top performers, we would only recommend picking up that extra cost in certain extenuating circumstances. The Honeywell True HEPA Allergen Remover gulps up electricity, resulting in a high lifetime cost of $771. The Dyson Pure Cool Link uses electricity very economically, but its high list price pushes the lifetime cost to $889. That extra cost is only worth it if you're enamored with Dyson's bladeless fan technology. The Blueair Pure 211 has expensive replacement filters, resulting in a lifetime cost of $1,105. This machine also has the highest capacity of any model we tested, so that enormous extra cost might be worth it if you're trying to clean a large, 500+ square foot room.
While an air purifier certainly isn't a necessity, it can be effective at relieving some symptoms for those with bad allergies, or those with pulmonary illnesses that live in areas with poor air quality. You have to shop carefully, however, because some models are much more effective at air cleaning than others, some are whisper quiet while others are grating, and some that look like a bargain hide extra costs in the form of expensive filters. We hope that our testing results have elucidated all of those things for you, and led you to the perfect models for your home. Now go fight that pollen!
— Max Mutter and Steven Tata