Searching for a vacuum that sweeps away the competition? We spent hours and hours researching all of the top products in this field, then selected the 13 most promising to buy and test head-to-head. We subjected these vacuums to a veritable barrage of tests, ranking and scoring their cleaning performance when tasked with collecting all kinds of debris on both hard and soft floors. Additionally, we also looked at how each vacuum handled and its maneuverability, as well as how easy each vacuum is to use overall. Check out the complete review below to see which vacuum is truly the best of the bunch, which one is the best bang for the buck and won't suck your bank account dry, and which ones fall flat.
Best Vacuum Cleaners of 2018
Analysis and Award Winners
For this iteration of the review, we decided to add another vacuum from Shark into the mix, the Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional. This is an excellent vacuum cleaner, delivering an awesome performance that totally surprised us. It almost claimed the top spot, but it couldn't quite oust the Shark Rotator, falling short by a few points, failing to match the Rotator's exceptional performance when it came to cleaning hard floors. However, the Navigator retails for quite a bit less, making it an excellent value option and earning it a Best Buy Award. Keep reading to see exactly how it performed and how it stacked up to the rest of the vacuums in the bunch.
Best Overall Vacuum Cleaner
Shark Rotator with DuoClean
Delivering the top performance of the entire pack, the Shark Rotator with DuoClean easily claimed an Editors' Choice award and the title of Best Overall Vacuum. This model swept the floor with the competition, scoring at or near the top of the pack in every single test we conducted, doing particularly well at cleaning hard floors. The Rotator is highly maneuverable and incredibly versatile, with its various attachments and the Lift-Away feature allowing you to clean the entirety of your home with ease — even the ceiling! This agile vacuum easily cleans under furniture and does a great job at picking up pet hair.
Unfortunately, this product is definitely a little on the expensive side and might be a little more than most people want to pay for a vacuum cleaner. It also is quite prone to toppling when using the accessory hose with the main body still attached to the floor cleaning base. However, this is a minor setback and the Rotator is still the best vacuum we have tested to date by far. While this vacuum is a little pricey, it isn't close to being the most expensive of the group and is the perfect choice for those that want the absolute best when it comes to vacuums.
Read Full Review: Shark Rotator with DuoClean
Best for Carpet Cleaning
Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly
Standing out from the rest of the pack with its unmatched carpet cleaning capabilities, the Elite Pet Friendly from Kenmore also earned an Editors' Choice award. This bulky bagged vacuum cleaner is a little bare bones when it comes to extra features and functions, but it can't be beaten when it comes to carpet cleaning performance.
However, this exceptional cleaning performance does come at a price. It is definitely a hefty product and a little less maneuverable, but it is the clear choice for carpeted homes that have need heavy-duty cleaning. It also does a solid job of keeping hard floors cleans and is definitely something to consider if you want a vacuum that can keep up with even the messiest pets or kids.
Read Full Review: Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly
Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional
If you are looking for a great vacuum, but are unwilling to spend more than $200, then the Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional is a perfect choice. This vacuum does an exceptionally good job at removing all types of debris from carpet, even delivering an essentially perfect performance when it came to picking up pet hair. This vacuum isn't overly heavy or particularly cumbersome, is overall very easy to use, and highly maneuverable, mainly due to its swivel head.
However, we weren't the most impressed with its performance on hard floors. It cleans up medium-sized debris fairly well, but struggles with very fine or larger items, struggling to collect flour and Cheerios in our tests. While it didn't do the best job, this could usually be remedied by simply doing a few extra passes and the floor was far more than adequately cleaned. All in all, this is our favorite vacuum when shopping on a budget. It holds its own with other models that cost significantly more and delivers an above average performance across the board. If you don't want to break the bank for a solid vacuum that gets the job done, then the Shark Navigator is the perfect vacuum for you.
Read Full Review: Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional
Best on a Tight Budget
This inexpensive canister vacuum isn't the top model by any means, but it did decently well in our tests. It scored above average in almost every set of tests we did and costs a fraction of the price of the top models. This no-frills model is very nimble and maneuverable for cleaning in tight places, can keep both carpet and hard floors suitably clean, and doesn't weigh too much.
Unfortunately, it doesn't do terribly well at collecting pet hair and its overall cleaning performance pales in comparison to the top models that we tested. However, for those that want a bare-bones option for a tight budget, then the Zing is an excellent choice.
Read Full Review: BISSELL Zing
Best Canister Vacuum
Miele Compact C1 Turbo
While the performance of the Miele Compact C1 Turbo didn't merit an award, we felt that this vacuum cleaner still deserved some recognition. This canister vacuum is easy to use and setup, highly maneuverable, and one of our favorite models for quick cleanup — especially in cluttered areas. The Miele earned the highest score of all the canister vacuums in our test, making it a solid choice for those that have a strong preference for this style of vacuum over an upright model.
Unfortunately, this bagged vacuum is quite expensive — one of the pricier models of the entire group. While Miele vacuums do have a solid reputation for longevity and durability, it still is a formidable chunk of change to spend on a vacuum that didn't take home the top score.
Read Full Review: Miele Compact C1 Turbo
Analysis and Test Results
To rate these products, we put them through a series of challenging tests designed to push them to their limits. We conducted over 20 different tests for each vacuum, equating to hours and hours vacuuming up pet hair, oatmeal, flour, cereal, and rice from different types of carpet and hard floors. These tests were divided among 5 weighted rating metrics: Carpet Cleaning, Ease of Use, Handling, Hard Surface Cleaning, and Pet Hair. Each product received a score from 0-100, with the following sections giving more details about how each product performed and why it scored what it did.
If you are looking for a top-of-the-line vacuum, then you should expect to spend at least $250. Both of our Editors' Choice award winners, the Shark Rotator and the Kenmore Elite, cost more than this, but offer unmatched performance, the former giving the best all-around performance that you can get and the latter doing the best job at cleaning carpets by far. If spending that much on a vacuum is too much for you, then you should consider either of our Best Buy Award winners, either the Shark Navigator Professional or the Bissell Zing. The Navigator only makes some minor concessions in overall performance, doing a less than desirable job at cleaning hard floors but excellent in every other aspect. This vacuum costs less than $200. If this is still too much, then the Zing is the clear choice, retailing for around $50, but its overall performance dropped significantly from the top products.
By far the most common use of these products and the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about vacuums is cleaning carpets. Consequently, this metric accounted for the largest portion of the score, weighing in at 35% of the total score. We used oatmeal, cereal, rice, and flour as our sample types of debris, spreading each out on the low and medium-pile carpet and pressing it in with a floor roller, then running each vacuum over it. We compared the results, counting the number of passes to get the floor visually clean, as well as comparing the amount of debris picked up in a single pass to determine scores, shown by the following chart.
As shown, the Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly took home the top score, earning an 8 out of 10 for its exceptional performance. This model did an amazing job collecting rice, only requiring two passes to clean the everything up, on both low and medium-pile carpet.
The Kenmore continued its excellent performance when it came to cereal and oatmeal, leading the group. However, it did take a few more passes (6-8) to get the oatmeal out of the fluffy, medium-pile carpet satisfactorily. Unfortunately, the performance dropped when it came to flour — while it still maintained its top spot when cleaning the flour out of the medium-pile carpet, the Kenmore dropped to the middle of the pack on the low-pile carpet, outperformed by both Shark vacuums and the Hoover WindTunnel.
Following the Kenmore, a quartet of vacuums all tied for the runner-up position, with the Shark Rotator with DuoClean, the Navigator Lift-Away Professional, the Dyson Ball Animal 2, and the Miele Compact C1 all earning a 7 out of 10 for their superb carpet cleaning skills.
The Shark Rotator did an excellent job at collecting the rice — on par with the Kenmore — even getting the vast majority of the rice in a single pass on the medium-pile carpet.
The Shark Rotator performed on par with the Kenmore for cereal, requiring 2 or fewer passes to sufficiently clean the carpet, and even did the best out of all the vacuums at collection flour from low-pile carpet, tying with the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball. However, the performance of the Rotator dropped to third overall when collection flour from fluffy carpet and didn't really impress at collecting oatmeal, requiring 10 passes to sufficiently clean the carpet.
The Navigator Lift-Away Professional also did very well at collecting rice, matching the Rotator when it came to cleaning the low-pile carpet. However, it didn't do quite as well on the fluffier carpet, requiring a few extra passes to catch a few of the residual grains. The Navigator Lift-Away Professional struggled a little with the flour on the flat carpet, but did an excellent job on the fluffier carpet, significantly outperforming the Rotator.
It finished out with a strong performance in our cereal and oat collection assessments on low-pile carpet, but it did take a few extra passes to get all of the debris on the fluffier carpets. The Navigator Lift-Away Professional tended to push the debris around for a while before collecting it, more so with the Cheerios.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 matched the performance of the Shark Rotator at collecting rice, though it did take a few more passes to match the amount of material collected. However, it did relatively poorly at collecting flour — dropping to the middle and the lower half of the pack for this test — tying with the Hoover on the flat carpet and performing second-worst in the fluffy carpet test, only beating the Oreck.
It performed on par with the Rotator for collecting cereal and oatmeal on low-pile carpet, but slightly worse on the fluffier, medium-pile tests.
The Miele did quite well at collecting flour, tying for the overall runner-up position in both of the tests.
However, its performance dropped slightly in the remaining three tests — delivering an above-average, rather than exceptional performance. It did slightly worse than the Dyson Ball Animal 2 at collecting oatmeal on low-pile carpet but slightly better on fluffy carpet, doing as well as the Kenmore. It did reasonably well in the cereal and rice test, performing well on the flat carpet and average on the fluffy carpet.
Next, the Shark Navigator Deluxe and the Bissell Zing earned a 6 out of 10 for their overall above average performance at cleaning carpets.
The Shark Navigator Deluxe didn't quite match the Rotator when it came to collecting rice, performing similarly on flat carpet but lagging behind on the fluffy carpet. The Navigator Deluxe left more rice behind than the Rotator after completing more passes. The same pattern emerged in the flour test, with the Navigator Deluxe coming in a very close second to the Rotator and the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball on the low-pile carpet, but finishing in the middle of the pack in the fluffy carpet test.
Once again, the Navigator Deluxe did better at collecting cereal from the low-pile carpet, only requiring an extra pass to match the Rotator or Kenmore, but requiring multiple passes to clean sufficiently, as it tended to "snowplow" the Cheerios around, rather than sucking them up. However, the Navigator Deluxe did do very well in the oatmeal test, matching the performance of the Rotator.
The Bissell Zing delivered a solid performance across the board, doing particularly well in the flour and cereal test. While it did alright on the low-pile carpet, it tended to do much better on the fluffy carpet — breaking a trend for these products. In fact, it almost tied the Kenmore's performance at collecting flour from the medium-pile carpet. It delivered an average performance in the rice and oatmeal tests.
Next, the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball, Eureka Mighty Mite, and Hoover WindTunnel 2 all earned a 5 out of 10 for their acceptable carpet cleaning performance. The Dyson Cinetic Big Ball led this trio in the rice test, outperforming both the Eureka and the Hoover. However, it still couldn't come close to the performance of either Shark model or the Dyson Ball Animal 2. However, the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball did do exceptionally well in the flour test, receiving the top score overall on low-pile and the third-highest on medium pile carpet.
The Eureka and the Hoover did a slightly sub-par job at collecting rice, leaving behind a significant amount of rice. Their performance didn't improve in the flour test, only collecting the flour on the surface of the carpet.
Moving on to the cereal test, the Eureka actually did quite well, doing an above average job on par with the Bissell Zing. The Hoover did about average, while the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball did an abysmal job, clogging up from the crushed Cheerios.
The Dyson Cinetic did redeem itself slightly in the oatmeal test, doing an average to an above-average job, only leaving a few flakes behind. The Hoover followed closely, leaving a little bit more behind, with the Eureka leaving the most oatmeal remaining of this trio.
Finishing towards the bottom of the group for our carpet cleaning tests, the Oreck XL and the Bissell 9595A both earning a 4 out of 10 for their subpar performance. The 9595A did very poorly at collecting rice, with the Oreck performing even worse, leaving plenty of residual rice after multiple passes.
The Oreck and Bissell 9595A both finished at the back of the pack in the flour test, tying for the second-worst score respectively. Performance improved slightly with cereal and oatmeal, with both models scoring average, or just below.
The Hoover Sprint QuickVac received a 3 out of 10 — the lowest score overall. It did very poorly across the board, leaving plenty of missed debris in all four tests.
Ease of Use
Ranking behind carpet cleaning performance, our Ease of Use metric ranked next in terms of importance, accounting for 25% of the final score. We compared the noise of each vacuum cleaner, its maximum reach, the ease of cleaning close to edges and under furniture, as well as how each vacuum cleaner handled transitioning between different surfaces. You can see how each product performed on the following chart.
There wasn't as much of a stark contrast in performance in this metric, with a handful of models — the Shark Rotator DuoClean, Kenmore Elite Pet Friendly, the Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional, and the Eureka Mighty Mite — all earning the top score of 7 out of 10. The Eureka and the Shark Rotator both handle surface transitions exceptionally well — though not quite on par with the Dyson Ball Animal 2. The Eureka has a button on the head, while the Rotator has a button on the handle, with a hard floor option that will slow down the rotating brush, as well as options to select between low-pile and medium-pile carpet.
The Navigator Lift-Away Professional only gives you the option to turn the rotating brush on or off, with no options for different piles of carpet or for adjusting the height of the extractor. However, it is very easy to turn the brush on or off with a convenient button right near the top of the vacuum.
It is a little hard to adjust the Kenmore, requiring you to turn a knob on the front of the vacuum. However, the Kenmore was the beat of the entire group at cleaning in close to the edge, leaving the least residual debris.
The Eureka and the Navigator Lift-Away Professional also do a very good job of cleaning in close to the edges and into the corners of a room. Both of these products outperformed the Shark Rotator, leaving only a minuscule amount of residual mess behind.
The Shark Rotator redeemed itself in our next test, earning top marks when it comes to cleaning underneath furniture. This vacuum reaches a little over 10" without the lift-away function and completely cleaning underneath when using it. The Eureka matched the performance of the Rotator, while the Navigator Lift-Away Professional and Kenmore only made it about 9" and 7" under our test "sofa", respectively.
Next, we looked at the maximum reach of each vacuum. We measured both the cord and the reach, to determine how far you could effectively clean from the outlet. The Kenmore has both the longest reach of this group, as well as one of the longest reaches overall, with the rest of the products falling in behind it.
Finally, we compared the noise levels of each product. The Eureka and the Navigator Lift-Away Professional are definitely among the quietest of this top group, measuring in at 74.5 dBa and 73 dBa, respectively. The remainder of the vacuums are quite a bit louder and some had higher-pitched tones that are significantly more irritating, even if they only read slightly louder on our SPL meter, like the Miele.
Following the top performing models, the majority of the pack all were about the same to use, with the Bissell Zing, Dyson Ball Animal 2, Dyson Cinetic Big Ball, Miele Compact C1 Turbo, Oreck XL, and Shark Navigator Deluxe all earning a 6 out of 10 for their above average performance.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 is the best at switching between flooring types, automatically transitioning, with the option to turn off the brush. The Bissell Zing is identical to the Eureka when transitioning, with a button on the head that you step on.
The Dyson Cinetic will automatically transition between surfaces, but the brush can't be stopped. However, you can hold a trigger down to release suction to avoid sucking in long fibers from rugs or high-pile carpets. The Navigator Deluxe doesn't adjust for different floors, but allows you to turn the brush on or off. The Miele requires you to swap heads for hard floors, while the Oreck lacks all adjustability.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 did the best of this group at edging, just barely being outperformed by the Kenmore. Next, the Navigator Deluxe and the Oreck got the next-closest to the edge, both leaving a small amount of debris in the tight corners.
The Bissell Zing, Dyson Cinetic Big Ball, and Miele were all about average, leaving more debris in the corner and missing a few spots here and there.
The Miele, Dyson Cinetic, and the Zing did exceptionally well at reaching under furniture, with this trilogy of canister vacuums completely cleaning the area under our test "sofa". The Oreck also did very well, especially for an upright model, reaching between 10"-11" under the furniture. The Navigator Deluxe and the Dyson Ball Animal 2 did alright, reaching about 6" under.
The Oreck XL had the longest reach of the group at 37', with the Bissell Zing and the Navigator Deluxe having the shortest at 27'. The Miele and Dyson models were in the middle, ranging from 30' and 32'.
The Navigator Deluxe, Bissell Zing, and Miele were on the quiet side — on par or just slightly louder than the Kenmore. The Dyson models were about average, similar to the Eureka, and the Oreck XL was a bit loud.
Next, the Sprint QuickVac earned a 5 out of 10 for its showing. This model does give you the option to adjust the floor setting, but it is quite difficult to physically turn.
This vacuum is about average in terms of noise levels and at cleaning under furniture, though it has an incredibly short cord.
Finishing out the bottom of this metric, the Bissell 9595A and the Hoover WindTunnel once again earned the lowest score, meriting a 4 out of 10 for their subpar performance.
Both of these models have a knob in the front to adjust the height for different floors, but neither of these models allows you to stop the brush. These vacuums didn't excel in the edging test, leaving a small strip of rice behind.
The Hoover did alright at reaching under furniture, making it about 7" — on par with the Kenmore. The Bissell 9595A only made it about 5", making it the worst of the entire group. Both the Bissell 9595A and the Hoover have a comparatively short reach of 27' and were on the louder side.
Comprising 20% of the total score, our Handling metric encompassed maneuvering each vacuum around common obstacles, cleaning stairs, and the pushing/pulling effort required from each model to clean. You can see how each vacuum scored in the chart below.
The Eureka Mighty Mite actually snagged the top spot, earning an 8 out of 10 for its exceptional performance in this metric. This highly maneuverable little vacuum easily cleans stairs, reaching up to 9 standard step before requiring you to move the canister.
It's also very light, so it's not too much effort when you actually move the main body of the vacuum. This canister vacuum also scored well in our maneuverability test, though the Shark Rotator and both Dyson models did navigate the test course with just a little bit more finesse. The Eureka was less effort to push and pull, requiring the least exertion of the entire group.
Following the Eureka, the Shark Rotator, the Navigator Lift-Away Professional, the Dyson Cinetic, the Dyson Ball Animal 2, the Hoover Sprint QuickVac, and the Bissell Zing all earned a 7 out of 10 for their excellent performance when it comes to our Handling metric.
The Bissell Zing, Navigator Deluxe, and the Dyson Ball Animal 2 all are the best of this group at cleaning stairs. The Navigator Deluxe and the Dyson Ball Animal 2 both can clean our entire flight of stairs with its accessory hose, negating the need to carry the vacuum cleaner up to complete cleaning.The Navigator Deluxe is also lighter than the Dyson Ball Animal 2, making it slightly easier to use to clean longer flights of stairs.
The Zing doesn't have anywhere close to the reach of the Ball Animal 2, only reaching about 7 steps. However, it is significantly lighter, making it very easy to carry up the stairs with you while cleaning. The Sprint QuickVac has a similar reach to the Zing, but is just a bit heavier to carry.
The Shark Rotator, the Navigator Lift-Away Professional, and the Dyson Cinetic reached almost as far as the Zing — about 6 steps, but are considerably heavier. However, the Shark Rotator, Navigator Lift-Away Professional, Dyson Cinetic, and Dyson Ball Animal 2 earned the highest marks overall in our test course, maneuvering through it flawlessly.
We found the Bissell Zing to be the hardest to maneuver of all the canister vacuums, but it did require minimal effort to push or pull. The QuickVac is about average to maneuver and takes negligible effort to push or pull. The Dyson Cinetic was a little more work than the Zing, but not as much as the Shark Rotator or the Dyson Ball Animal 2.
Next, the Miele, Oreck XL, and Navigator Deluxe all earned a 6 out for their overall handling. The Navigator Deluxe has exceptional reach, but got bumped out of the top groups by its relatively mediocre handling and the moderate effort it took to push or pull the vacuum cleaner.
The Miele could reach about one step further than the Bissell Zing and the Dyson Cinetic, but is heavier than the Zing and lighter than the Dyson. This put the Miele slightly above average at cleaning stairs, while the Oreck was the worst, lacking a cleaning hose.
The Miele did maneuver very well through our test course, on par with the Eureka Mighty Mite. The Oreck XL and the Navigator Deluxe handled alright, but are substantially clunkier than the Shark Rotator or Dyson Ball Animal 2. The Oreck did take a little less effort to push or pull than the Navigator Deluxe or Miele — on par with the Dyson Cinetic.
Moving up in the ranks slightly, the Bissell 9595A and the Hoover WindTunnel tied for the second to last position in our Handling metric, both earning a 5 out of 10 for their average showing. Both of these vacuums had decently long reaches, making it up 8 stairs and weren't terribly heavy.
However, this pair weren't the most maneuverable, clunkier and more cumbersome to steer than the Oreck XL and the Navigator Deluxer. The 9595A and the Hoover weren't too difficult to push or pull around, on par with the Dyson Ball Animal 2.
Finishing out the bottom of our Handling metric, the Kenmore Elite earned the lowest score of 4 out of 10. This model only reached up 6.5 stairs before you needed to move it — a pain, as it is exceptionally heavy. This model is big and clunky, making it hard to maneuver through our obstacle course, and requires significant effort to push or pull.
Hard Surface Cleaning
Making up 10% of the total score, our Hard Surface Cleaning test is essentially identical to our carpet cleaning tests, with hardwood floor swapped for carpet. Once again, we spread oatmeal, flour, cereal, and rice on the floor and vacuumed it up, evaluating the performance of each model. Our results are shown in the table below.
The Shark Rotator DuoClean earned the top score in this metric, receiving a 9 out of 10 for its excellent performance. Using the hard floor setting, the Rotator collected practically all of the rice in a single pass — even sucking in rice that was wider than the brush head, drawing it in. This vacuum cleaner also did a fantastic job of cleaning flour from the hard floor, even cleaning it out of the cracks and crevices — though it took about 10 passes.
This model carried its excellent performance over to our cereal and oatmeal tests, doing the best job at cleaning of the entire group with only a single pass.
After the Shark Rotator, the Miele and the Dyson Ball Animal 2 earned the next highest score of 7 out of 10. The Ball Animal 2 picked up all the rice on the first pass, similar to the Shark Rotator, while the Miele required two passes to match its performance. However, the Miele did match the performance of the Ball Animal 2 and the Shark Rotator in our flour test, with all three of these vacuums receiving a perfect score.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 did outperform the Miele at collecting Cheerios, once again only needing a single pass to the Miele's two. However, the Dyson would occasionally push the Cheerios around and pile them up, rather than sucking them up. The Dyson finished this metric with a reasonably good score in our oatmeal test, only leaving a few pieces behind that fell into the cracks between boards. The Miele did alright, tending to push stuff around more often than collecting it.
The bulk of the vacuums came next, with the Navigator Lift-Away Professional, the Bissell Zing, the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball, the Eureka Mighty Mite, the Kenmore Elite, and the Navigator Deluxe all earning a 6 out of 10 for their hard floor cleaning abilities.
The Navigator Deluxe and the Navigator Lift-Away Professional did a great job in the rice cleanup test, only needing a single pass to collect everything, compared to the two passes it took most of the other vacuums. However, the Navigator Deluxe's and the Navigator Lift-Away Professional's performance both dropped in the flour test. These products couldn't clean up any flour that had fallen in the cracks between boards and plenty of flour became stuck on the wheels throughout the course of the test. The Kenmore also suffered from a similar problem, tracking the flour around as you are cleaning.
The Dyson Cinetic did an excellent job in the flour test, receiving a perfect score. The Bissell Zing would collect the flour out of the cracks if you really pushed the bristles of the brush head in with a scrubbing motion, but nothing could be done to clean the flour out of the cracks with the Eureka.
The Kenmore led this group in the Cheerio collection test, doing a fine job. This vacuum was closely followed by the Navigator Deluxe, Bissell Zing, and Eureka Mighty Mite. The Navigator Deluxe would have some Cheerios trapped in its brush, while the Eureka, the Navigator Lift-Away Professional, and Zing would push the cereal around, rather than collecting it when moving the brush forward. These vacuums would all collect the cereal when you pulled the head towards you, leaving enough of a gap for the Cheerios to be sucked up.
The Dyson Cinetic did an absolutely terrible job at collecting Cheerios, crushing them up and immediately clogging.
Moving on to our oatmeal pickup test, the Navigator Lift-Away Professional did the best of the group, collecting the bulk of the oats in a single pass, with only a quick cleanup pass necessary to render the floor totally clean.
The Kenmore and the Shark did fairly well, performing similarly to the Dyson Ball Animal 2. The remaining three canister vacuums (Eureka Mighty Might, Dyson Cinetic, and Bissell Zing) all struggled with collecting oatmeal, instead preferring to push it around into piles.
Placing second to last in this metric, the Oreck XL earned a 4 out of 10 for its mediocre hard floor cleaning efforts. The Oreck did about average at collecting rice, though it did fling some around. It also did quite well at collecting flour, even getting some out of the cracks, performing on par with the Eureka. However, it did terrible at collecting cereal and oatmeal. The Cheerios were just pushed around, while the oatmeal test ended in mild catastrophe. The Oreck flung oats everywhere, rather than collecting them.
Next, the Hoover Sprint earned a 3 out of 10 for its performance. It did very poorly at collecting rice or Cheerios, flinging them around and causing substantially more mess than we started with — even on the hard floor setting. It did about average at collecting flour, but absolutely terrible at collecting oats, to the point where we just gave up and got a broom.
Last, in this set of tests, the Hoover WindTunnel earned a 2 out of 10 for its abysmal performance. This model did the worst of the bunch at collecting flour, leaving much more behind than other models. However, it was in the rice, cereal, and oatmeal tests where the Hoover demonstrated how terrible it is. This model flung rice everywhere, much to our dismay.
A similar thing occurred with Cheerios, while the oats were spread even more than the rice, creating a sizeable oat-pocalypse.
Finishing out our set of tests, the Pet Hair metric is responsible for the residual 10% of the final score. We spread 5 grams of pet hair on the medium-pile carpet, then pressed it in. We ran each vacuum over it, calculating the percentage collected to determine the final scores, as shown below.
Six vacuums received the top score of 9 out of 10 in our test: the Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional, the Dyson Ball Animal 2, the Dyson Cinetic Big Ball, the Kenmore Elite, Miele, and the Navigator Deluxe. These top-tier vacuums all collected 90% or more of the pet hair, with the Navigator Lift-Away Professional doing the best job overall, collecting over 99% of the hair that we spread out on the test carpet.
Finishing just behind these top models, the Bissell 9595A, Hoover WindTunnel, Oreck XL, and Shark Rotator all earned an 8 out of 10 for their good performance. This trio collected most of the pet hair, but left just a little more, getting 86%, 89%, 89%, and 88% of the hair respectively.
The QuickVac did reasonably well, earning a 7 out of 10 for the 83% of the hair that it collected.
Doing a somewhat awful job, the Bissell Zing and Eureka Mighty Mite failed to collect the majority of the pet hair, earning them a 3 and a 2 out of 10 respectively. The Bissell Zing picked up 33% of the hair, while the Eureka only got an abysmal 19%.
After all that testing and research, hopefully, this review has made it a little easier for you to find the perfect vacuum cleaner, whether you are looking for a top of the line model to make your floors sparkle or an economical option to keep your budget on track. If you want to know more, then you might want to take a look at our How We Test article for a breakdown of our testing procedures and how we scored.
Still not sure? Take a look at our buying advice article for more info.