Best Smartwatch of 2020
Best for Samsung Phones
Samsung Galaxy Watch
The Samsung Galaxy is an all-around impressive smartwatch. It is jam-packed with fitness tracking functions, has a solid set of smart features, and a great display, all with unmatched performance in our battery life test. It's also incredibly convenient and easy to use.
Some may say that the downside to this watch is that it has a large face and is very noticeable on the average wrist. That would make it a poor choice if you prefer your wearables to be discreet. Available in a 46mm and 42mm bezel size, even the smaller option can look enormous. Besides that, we had a difficult time finding any other major flaws. This product easily makes our top recommendation for anyone with a Samsung smartphone who is looking for the absolute best you can get when it comes to smartwatches.
Read Full Review: Samsung Galaxy Watch
Best for iOS/iPhones
Apple Watch Series 5
It's easy to see why the Apple Watch Series 5 earned one of the highest scores in the entire group. It is our top recommendation for anyone with an iPhone who wants the best of the best. It looks fantastic with a sleek and stylish design and has an eye-catching display. It is equipped with a comprehensive set of smart features along with an impressive set of fitness and health tracking abilities, like fall or Afib detection. It is also exceptionally intuitive and easy to use.
However, we weren't overly impressed with the performance of our battery life test. The Series 5 can draw out quite a bit of power. Unless users were very power-conscious in their use, most users would need to plan on charging the watch daily. The Series 5 also comes with one of the highest price tags compared to the others tested in our group. We would highly recommend it to anyone that wants the best, however, Android and Samsung users are out of luck, as the Apple Watch is only compatible with iPhones — it won't even work with iPads!
Read Full Review: Apple Watch Series 5
Best Bargain Option
The TicWatch E2 sets itself apart from the rest of the group for its exceptional value. This watch runs on WearOS, allowing you to use the integrated microphone to activate the Google Assistant and control all of its features and functions. It can run standalone apps and provides access to the Google Play Store — even if you have it paired to an iPhone. This watch also has a built-in GPS and heart rate sensor which enables you access to a solid set of fitness tracking capabilities.
However, while the E2 is an exceptional value, it can't compare to the top-tier offerings from Samsung or Google and finishes at the back of the pack in terms of its overall score. This watch has a very plain — borderline boring — look, so it isn't the best choice for someone who wants a truly stylish watch. We still highly recommend it to anyone who is looking to save some cash and is ok with a relatively bare-bones and simple smart timepiece despite these flaws.
Read Full Review: TicWatch E2
Best for Fitness Motivation and Training
Fitbit Versa 2
While the Fitbit Versa 2 didn't score highly with us overall, and doesn't have the best set of fitness tracking features, it does stand out as a great option for the fitness-focused wearer. It offers its own built-in coaching app and access to the extensive set of competitive and non-competitive challenges in the Fitbit app. It also is quite a bit less expensive than the top products and is much more discreet.
Unfortunately, it doesn't have a built-in GPS, instead, it relies on your connection with your smartphone. It also doesn't track quite as many activities as the Samsung Galaxy and other top contenders on our list. We found that it doesn't track your heart rate the most accurately and often shows erratic measurements during elevated physical activity. It does have some flaws, but it is a great value option for someone looking for a smartwatch that is more similar to a traditional fitness tracker.
Read Full Review: Fitbit Versa 2
Why You Should Trust Us
We began with tons of research of all the available information we could find on each watch to determine which watch tops them all. We then chose what we thought were the most promising models to buy and tested them head-to-head. We purchased all the watches in this review from retailers at full price; TechGearLab won't ever accept free units to review. For the past three years, our smartwatch testing process has been headed up by Austin Palmer and David Wise. Both Austin and David have extensive experience reviewing smart home and wearable products, having reviewed dozens and dozens of fitness trackers, pedometers, GPS watches, and VR headsets in addition to smartwatches.
We conducted over 25 different side-by-side assessments, evaluating nearly every aspect of these watches. We measured their maximum battery life under simulated general use conditions and checked the accuracy of their step counter against a true count using a mechanical tally counter. We compared app compatibility by using a selection of the most popular offerings currently available. We also had a panel of judges try out each product to see how comfortable they are, how easy they are to use, and to compare the design and aesthetics of each product.
Related: How We Tested Smartwatches
Analysis and Test Results
We split our testing process into five rating metrics — Ease of Use, Fitness Tracking, Smart Functions, Battery Life, and Display — that are each weighted proportional to their importance, with the results and performance of each watch compared below.
Related: Buying Advice for Smartwatches
There is a strong correlation between price and performance when it comes to these products. The Apple Watch Series 5 and the Samsung Galaxy, are both impeccable products but their base prices are significantly more than most of the other products. Additional features like a larger screen or standalone LTE connectivity can increase the cost even more. These products make sense if you want a ton of functionality right on your wrist but if you simply want something to show you notifications with basic fitness tracking capabilities, you are better off considering a less expensive model, like the Versa 2 or the TicWatch E2.
If sticker shock has set in, then you should consider the TicWatch E2. This is our favorite watch when you are trying to stick within a budget. It offers a solid performance at a price that is a fraction of the cost of the top models, even though it doesn't score highest overall. It can often be found at a discount and has most of the essential functions that you would want from one of these products. The Fitbit Versa 2 is another attractive budget option, especially if you are particularly interested in the fitness tracking features of these products. It is slightly more expensive than the TicWatch, but in our opinion is worth it as we found it quite a bit better overall. It also provides access to the extensive Fitbit fitness ecosystem. Unfortunately, it too lacks a dedicated GPS, relying on one in a paired device.
Ease of Use
Being that these products are intended to be used daily, commanding 30% of the total score for each smartwatch, is our Ease of Use metric. We find this to be the most significant of our entire testing process. Products that we found to be less than user-friendly we thought to be exceptionally irritating and made us less enthusiastic about all of the other features. Points were awarded to each product based on its interface method, how difficult it is to swap the wrist bands, how quickly each watch wakes when you raise your wrist, and the overall layout of the menus.
Earning an 8 out of 10, the Samsung Galaxy Watch, Gear S3, Gear Sport, and the Apple Watch Series 5 all tied for the top score in this metric. These watches all have exceptionally responsive touch screens for navigating through menus on the device and will wake up with practically zero delays when you turn your wrist to view them.
The Apple Watch Series 5 utilizes a crown scroll — the dial on the side can be rotated to scroll through menus — making it exceptionally easy to navigate quickly.
All three of the Samsung smartwatches lack a crown scroll but instead leverage a rotating bezel for a physical interface. The Samsung smartwatches all rely on a charging cradle, establishing an easy to use and extremely secure connection.
The Apple Watch Series 5 uses an inductive charger that mounts to the back of the watch with magnets. Although the connection is quite strong, the charger can still be knocked off with sufficient force. It is possible however to purchase bases for the standard charger that turns it into a charging cradle or stand if you prefer a more secure connection.
These watches are all waterproof enough to wear while swimming or in the shower. The Apple Watch meets a slightly more rigorous standard than the Gear S3, ISO 22810:10:2010 compared to IP68+, while both the Galaxy and the Gear Sport are rated for up to 5 ATM or 50 meters of water resistance. All of these watches even have a dedicated profile for tracking your swimming workouts.
It is a little easier to take screenshots on the Apple Watch compared to the trio of Samsung watches, which you can accomplish by pressing both buttons simultaneously. The screenshot is automatically sent as a photo directly to your phone. On the Galaxy, Gear S3, or the Gear Sport you hold down the "Home" button and swipe to the right to take the screenshot. It won't automatically sync to your phone, requiring you to manually send it from the gallery.
It was very easy to swap wristbands on all of these models, taking very little time at all, though it is a tiny bit faster and easier to swap between bands on the Apple Watch. Unfortunately, locating compatible bands for this watch is a little more difficult than for the Samsung smartwatches, as the Apple Watch doesn't use a typical mechanism.
The Samsung Galaxy Active2 comes in just behind the top-tier of watches for its ease of use, earning a 7 out of 10. It is comparable to the Galaxy Watch when it comes to changing wristbands and is also water-resistant to 50 meters/5 ATM. It has a great touchscreen that is exceptionally responsive to swipes and taps and when you raise your wrist it illuminates almost instantly.
However, the Active2 does away with a physical rotating bezel interface, replacing it with a capacitive touch bezel. In our opinion, this is better than the touchscreen-only interfaces but we liked it a little less than a truly mechanical one. The charging interface on this watch is also similar to the Apple Watch and is also prone to be knocked out of place.
Next, the TicWatch C2, the Fossil Q Explorist HR, and the Fitbit Versa 2 all earn a 6 out of 10 for their above-average ease of use. Each has a few drawbacks that made them slightly more of a hassle than the top watches.
The Fitbit Versa 2 is water-resistant, rated for submersion up to 50 meters, making it more than suitable to accompany you in the shower or pool. Its charging cradles are also the most secure of the entire group, actually clamping the watch in the place to the point where no amount of reasonable shaking would knock it loose.
It can be a bit finicky to swap the bands on the Versa 2. The touchscreen is quite responsive, though occasionally when raising your wrist it does have a slight lag compared to the top watches. There isn't any sort of physical rotational input, like a crown or bezel scroll, but it does have a few buttons so you aren't completely reliant on the touchscreen to interact with the watch.
The Fossil Explorist HR has a decently responsive touchscreen but also has a crown scroll as an additional input method. It is fairly easy to swap wristbands, but we do wish the charging connection was a bit more secure; it is noticeably more prone to accidental disconnects than the Apple Watch Series 5 or the Galaxy Active2. It also is rated as water-resistant to 30 meters, making it suitable to track swimming laps or to wear in the shower.
The C2 also relies solely on a touchscreen interface, which we found to be finicky throughout our testing. Periodically it misread a tap as a swipe and vice-versa.
We also found that the C2 is one of the slower watches to wake when sleeping. It takes almost a complete second for the screen to light up when we raised our wrist to look at it. We also wished that the water-resistance of this watch had been increased, as it is still only marked as rain or sweatproof, but is not suitable for total submersion for swimming. On the other hand, we do appreciate that it is extremely easy to swap the watch bands — almost on par with the Apple Watch Series 5 — and that the magnetically coupled charger attaches very securely, once it is aligned.
The TicWatch E2, the Huawei Watch GT Classic, and the Fitbit Ionic each receive a 5 out of 10 for their average ease of use. The TicWatch E2 is rated as water-resistant for up to 5 ATM/50 meters. It lacks a rotating crown or bezel, so you are restricted to using the touchscreen to navigate the menus. However, the screen is quite responsive to swipes and taps, as well as waking quickly when you raise your wrist. The charging setup is so-so and it is about average when it comes to swapping wristbands.
The Fitbit Ionic has a water resistance rating of up to 50 meters as well, along with a dedicated profile for tracking swimming workouts. We found the Ionic to be equally responsive as the others in this group, waking just as quickly as either the E2 or the GT Classic, with all three taking less than a second to light up when you raise your wrist to view the screen. However, these all have a slightly noticeable delay — especially when compared to the near-instantaneous wake of either the Apple Watch or one of the Samsung products, though it is easier to swap bands on the Ionic than the Apple Watch. The Fitbit Ionic has a charging connector that plugs into the back of the watch, which we found to be easily be disconnected with only minor movement.
The Huawei GT Classic also relies on the touchscreen as its sole input method and is water-resistant to 5 ATM. It did stand out from the E2 and the Ionic by having the most secure charging connection and by being a little easier when it came to swapping wristbands.
This metric encompasses the main set of features on these products, comparing their compatibility with popular apps, whether or not you could take phone calls on your wrist, control your music, pay for things, or navigate with a built-in GPS. To test app compatibility, we picked a sample group of common apps (Uber, Facebook Messenger, Spotify, Strava, IFTTT, Evernote, Shazam, Instagram, and a Twitter viewer) and tried to install them on each model. This group of tests makes up 20% of the total score.
Earning an 8 out of 10, the Apple Watch Series 5 takes home the top spot when it comes to smart functions. This model is compatible with Uber, Facebook Messenger, Strava, IFTTT (If this, then that), Evernote, Twitterific, and Shazam. It also has limited functionality with Spotify, though there are rumors of a full-featured app in the works. The Apple Watch Series 5 lets you take calls on your wrist, using its built-in microphone and speaker. The sound quality is about average, making it easy to hear the other party talking with your arm bent at a 90-degree angle.
This watch has a built-in GPS that will automatically turn on when its associated phone is out of range. It also comes with standalone LTE connectivity if you paid for the upgrade, has NFC communication, and is compatible with Apple Pay. Also, it has music control and the capability to open Pandora from the watch itself, as well as voice control through Siri.
A set of Samsung watches all follow in the next tier, with the Galaxy Watch, Gear S3, and the Galaxy Watch Active2 all earning a 7 out of 10. Compared to these watches, the Apple Watch doesn't have the largest library for stand-alone apps but it usually has all the most popular ones, with more being added all the time. They do work fairly well with messaging apps, offering a set of preprogrammed quick responses that you can also edit in the app.
All of these Samsung smartwatches have an integrated speaker and microphone, which allow you to place or answer a phone call directly from your wrist without pulling out your phone. Additionally, this trio has built-in GPS and NFC modules for more accurate location data and contactless payments. There are also standalone LTE versions available if you truly want to leave your phone behind without sacrificing constant connectivity.
The Explorist HR and the Ticwatch C2 follow next, both earning a 6 out of 10. These watches run on Wear OS, so they have essentially an identical set of app compatibility. The Explorist HR is also compatible with Android Pay and has a built-in GPS, but it lacks a speaker so you cannot take calls on your wrist.
The TicWatch C2 expands on the smart functions of the original TicWatch E, adding NFC communication so you can use it as a payment option with Google (Android) Pay. It also has a microphone for voice control and an integrated GPS module but doesn't have a speaker for taking standalone calls. It does come with a standard set of music controls available on the Wear OS watches.
Next, the Samsung Gear Sport and the Fitbit Versa 2 earn a 5 out of 10 for their middle-of-the-road set of smart functions. The Samsung Gear Sport has a smaller range of app compatibility, identical to the other Samsung watches. It will notify you of incoming calls, though you have to answer them on your phone, rather than on the device itself, in comparison to the Galaxy or the S3 that have built-in speakers. However, if you also have your phone paired with a set of Bluetooth earbuds or headphones, it will allow you to answer the call from the watch itself. The Gear Sport does have a built-in GPS, as well as the ability to control your music and pay for transactions using Samsung Pay.
Fitbit is a little behind in the smartwatch game compared to Samsung or Apple but the Versa 2 is slowly getting more and more compatibility with third-party apps. It has basic music controls and can be used for transactions with Fitbit Pay if you have the special edition of the watch. It doesn't have a speaker, so you can't take a call on the watch, but it does have a mic for voice control. The Versa 2 also relies on whatever phone it is paired with for its location information given that it does not have an integrated GPS module.
The TicWatch E2 and the Fitbit Ionic come next, both earning a 4 out of 10. The TicWatch E2 is a Wear OS watch, so it has a modest amount of third-party app compatibility, able to work with Uber, Messenger, Spotify, Strava, and IFTTT. This watch doesn't have an integrated speaker but it does have an internal microphone — mainly used for voice control features.
The E2 gives you basic control of your music and has a standalone GPS module but lacks integrated cellular or NFC modules. Although functionality is being added all the time, as it stands currently the Fitbit Ionic is a little lacking when it comes to smart features and functions.
Some of the main apps that these watches are currently compatible with are Uber, Starbucks, Strava, Yelp, New York Times, Spotify HR, and Pandora, along with a few other third-party health apps.
You can't take phone calls on the Ionic and it lacks standalone LTE connectivity, but it does have Fitbit Pay and the ability to control your music.
At the bottom of this metric, the Huawei Watch GT Classic earns a 2 out of 10 for its minimal set of smart functions. This watch moved away from Wear OS to Huawei's own Lite OS, which unfortunately was accompanied by a significant reduction in smart features.
It doesn't appear to offer any third-party app compatibility and does not allow you to take calls on your wrist. It also does not have any NFC or standalone cellular units but does offer a GPS module.
It defeats the purpose of any of the smart features on these products if you can't easily see the information displayed on the screen. We evaluated the quality, its visibility in bright light, whether or not the brightness automatically adjusts to changing light conditions, or if an always-on mode is available. We also awarded points if the screen was a complete circle and not truncated at the bottom. This metric comprises 20% of the total score.
Once again, the Apple Watch Series 5, the Samsung Galaxy, the Active2, the Gear S3, and the Samsung Gear Sport all have exceptionally eye-catching displays, tying for the top spot and earning an 8 out of 10.
Although the overall image quality is excellent on all of the watches, we found that we slightly preferred the Apple Watch Series 5's OLED Retina display to the AMOLED display on the Samsung smartwatches. The Apple Watch Series 5 is available with a 40mm or 44mm screen, having a resolution of 324x394 and 368x448, respectively.
It is super easy to see the screen in both bright sunlight and dimmer conditions. The Apple Watch will not automatically adjust the brightness but you do have the option to set the display to be always on. The Samsung watches have both of these features.We found the image on the Samsung watches to be very similar, though the larger Galaxy watch and the S3 have slightly larger 1.3" screens, while the Gear Sport and the smaller Galaxy have a 1.2" screen. The Active2 is available in two sizes, with either a 1.2" or 1.4" diameter display. Even in bright sunlight, we found it easy to read the display of all of these watches and we found it quite handy to be able to turn the backlight to be always on or to automatically adjust to the conditions.
The pair of smartwatches from Fitbit came next, with the Versa 2 and the Ionic both earning a 7 out of 10. Their screens were excellent, but still second-tier. The Fitbit Versa 2 has a visually stunning square LCD display, measuring in at 1.34" across and having a resolution of 300x300.
Unfortunately, it is more difficult to read the text in bright lighting conditions, mainly due to the white-on-black color scheme. The sun usually washes out the text when outside on a sunny day. We do like the automatic brightness adjustment modes but would like to see the ability to set the display to be always-on at any time, not just when using the watch to workout.
The Fitbit Ionic also has a great display, almost matching that of the Samsung Gear Sport or the Galaxy. It is a rectangular 348x250 display that will automatically adjust its brightness to ambient light conditions, but it is still harder to read than the Apple or Samsung watches in bright light. Much like the Samsung watches, it can also only be set to 'always-on' during workouts, rather than at any time.
Next, the Fossil Explorist HR, the TicWatch C2, the E2, and the Huawei GT Classic all merit a 6 out of 10 for their slightly above average displays. Both of these watches have essentially the same size display and are about the same in image quality — good, but noticeably worse than the Apple Watch or Samsung Galaxy. The TicWatch C2 has a 1.3" AMOLED display. Its quality is reasonably high, improving on the display of its predecessors, but still doesn't quite compare to the Retina or Super AMOLED displays of the best models.
The E2 has a similar screen but is slightly higher quality than the C2. It has a 1.39" AMOLED displays with a resolution of 400x400, compared to the 360x360 of the C2. The Huawei also has a 1.39" AMOLED screen but has an even higher resolution of 454x454.
All of these except the Huawei GT have an always-on mode available, but the TicWatch C2 and the E2 can't automatically adjust the backlight brightness to ambient lighting conditions. Additionally, none of these are all that easy to read in bright daylight.
The fitness tracking features each watch offers are responsible for 15% of the final score. We based scores on the accuracy of the step counter — as determined by comparing the count shown on each watch to our manual count over a mile-long walk. We also reviewed which workouts each watch can track and what data they collect, how accurately they track the number of stairs climbed each day, and the accuracy of the heart rate monitor by comparing the measured reading against a chest strap control HR monitor.
The Series 5 takes home the top score in this metric earning a 9 out of 10 for its excellent fitness tracking performance. This watch was exceptionally accurate in our step count tests, having an average discrepancy from the true count of fewer than 10 steps in our three-mile-long walk. Its heart rate monitor aligned almost perfectly with the chest strap monitor we used as a control when measuring a resting heart rate and was accurate about 85% of the time with an elevated heart rate. The Series 5 also has an ECG and can detect if you are going into atrial fibrillation.
Additionally, the Series 5 has a ton of different profiles to choose from when it comes to tracking your activities and provides a solid amount of data about your workout, as well as automatically detecting if you start or stop a workout. However, it registered only about half of the staircases that we climbed in our test.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch, the Active2, the Gear S3, and the Gear Sport all tied for second place in the metric, each earning a score of 8 out of 10. All of these watches are highly accurate at counting steps, with the largest discrepancy for any of these watches being about 34 steps in any of our mile-long walking tests. This group also delivered solidly accurate results in our heart rate, though we found them to be less accurate when the wearer has an elevated heart rate than we did with the Series 5.
The clear winner when it comes to workout-tracking is the Samsung Galaxy Watch, having the largest library of profiles and automatically detecting if you begin an activity, recording it, and can even chain together up to six different exercises if you switch activities mid-workout.
The S3, the Active2, and the Gear Sport all offer a ton of different workout profiles but don't appear to have the ability to chain together different exercises like the Galaxy Watch can.
However, these Samsung watches all fare poorly when it comes to counting flights of stairs, with only the S3 even coming close to recording all 10 flights of stairs we climbed in the test.
The TicWatch E2, the Huawei GT Classic, the Fitbit Ionic, the Versa 2 and the Explorist HR came next, each receiving a 6 out of 10 for their decent performance.
Given the Fitbit's origins as a fitness tracking company, the Fitbit Ionic's less than stellar showing came as a bit of a surprise. It was decently accurate at counting steps, only deviating about 1.8% from the true manual count, but we weren't impressed by its performance at measuring heart rate. We found it to be a little erratic and it took a long time to settle on a stable reading. It also deviated substantially from the chest strap heart rate monitor we were comparing the reading to during a mild workout. The Ionic did have a decent number of workout profiles and is quite accurate at tracking flights of stairs climbed.
The Versa 2 had a slightly bigger discrepancy in our step counting tests than the Ionic, having an average error of 26 steps. However, we did find that the Versa 2's heart rate monitor aligned much better with the chest strap than the Ionic. However, we still noticed some issues when it came to measuring an elevated heart rate.
The Versa 2 has a handful of different workout profiles, though much less than the top models. However, it did impress us with its accuracy at counting the number of flights of stairs climbed.
The Explorist was highly accurate in our step tracking tests, only deviating from the true count by 8 steps in its worst trial. However, it was much more erratic when it came to measuring heart rate and does not track the number of stairs climbed. This watch runs on Wear OS and uses the Google Fit app for workout tracking, which provides a respectable amount of different workouts that you can track and a solid set of recorded stats.
The E2 was decently accurate in our step count tests, only differing from the true manual count by 10-30 steps or so over a mile-long walk. However, it didn't have a very accurate heart rate monitor, producing a discrepancy of up to 10 bpm at a resting heart rate in our tests. With an elevated heart rate, it got even more erratic, exhibiting a discrepancy of 42 bpm at one point in our tests.
It also has a ton of different workout profiles in the Google Fit Workout app but does not count the number of flights of stairs you climb.
The Huawei GT was equally accurate in our step counting tests as the TicWatch E2 but we thought it was just a little bit less accurate in our heart rate assessments. It was about the same as the E2 at measuring resting heart rate but was wildly inaccurate compared to the chest strap while exercising. It also has a modest amount of workout profiles and lacks an altimeter to track flights of stairs climbed.
The TicWatch C2 is about average in terms of fitness tracking functions, earning a 5 out of 10. It does have a fairly accurate step counter and a decent suite of workouts you can track, either by using the default Google Fit app or a third-party app, like Strava or Runkeeper. It also will try and auto-detect the type of workout you are doing, though it does need a bit of training before it starts to work correctly.
However, this watch does not monitor the number of stairs you climb each day and there was usually a huge discrepancy between the chest strap heart rate monitor and the heart rate recorded by the C2 in our tests, particularly with active heart rates.
Similar to our display metric, none of the various features and functions of these products are any good when the battery is dead. We tested how long each watch lasted with normal use, how long it would take to completely charge a dead watch, and how long it would take to charge to 50%, all combining to be worth 15% of the overall score for each smartwatch. This is because the batteries in these watches don't charge linearly, and will rapidly charge up most of the way, then slow down to top off. On an identical schedule, we sent a variety of notifications, texts, and calls to each watch throughout the test for each model and recorded how long they lasted.
Delivering an unmatched performance easily claiming the top spot of this metric scoring a 10 out of 10 was the Huawei Watch GT Classic. This watch did significantly better than the rest, lasting for 1.5 - 2 weeks in our tests but its smart features are so limited compared to the rest that it almost seems unfair to compare them. It also charges exceptionally fast, only taking about 30 minutes to reach 50% from being completely depleted and 87 minutes to completely recharge.
The Samsung Galaxy watch followed, earning a 9 out of 10. It lasted for a whopping 118 hours in our test, or just shy of five days — solidly impressive for a watch that has a decent set of smart functions. It also states that you can get up to 24 hours of use from the GPS with a fully-charged battery. However, this watch does take a long time to charge, taking over an hour to reach 50% and almost three to completely recharge.
The Fitbit Ionic came next with an impressive 96 hours of battery life of normal use. This lead it to earn an 8 out of 10 for its superb battery life.
It also charged decently fast, hitting 50% in just 45 minutes of charging and 100% after 123 minutes.
The Fitbit Versa 2, the Gear S3 and the Gear Sport all tied for third place in this group of tests, all meriting a 7 out of 10 for their solid battery life.
The Gear S3 lasted the longest of this group, holding on for an amazing 76 hours before the battery was completely dead, followed by the 72 hours of the Gear Sport. The Versa came next, remaining on for about the same (72 hours) of our testing process before calling it quits.
When it came to charging, the Versa 2 did a bit better than the pair of Samsung watches, taking about 40 minutes to reach 50% battery and 105 minutes to completely recharge. This is substantially better than the Gear S3, which took 63 minutes to get to 50% and over two hours to completely charge and the Gear Sport, which took about 75 minutes to get to 50% and about three hours to charge.
The Galaxy Active2 by Samsung performed a bit better than average, meriting it a 6 out of 10. This timepiece lasted for approximately 48 hours with typical use. We also like that it doesn't take too long to recharge, completely charging in 105 minutes and only taking 40 minutes to hit a 50% charge when starting with a fully depleted battery.
Next, the Apple Watch Series 5, the TicWatch C2, and the TicWatch E2 all earned a 5 out of 10 for their average battery life. The Series 5 lasted for 30-36 hours in our battery life assessments and takes a little over two hours to completely recharge. The TicWatch E2 lasted for about 25 hours in our normal usage test — one of the shortest times of the group. This means you might get 2 days out of the watch, but most likely you are going to want to charge it every night or at some point every day. However, this model does charge quite quickly, only taking about 32 minutes to hit 50% and 75 minutes to completely top off a dead battery.
The C2 is about the same, though it usually lasts 3-5 hours longer than the E2 and has a roughly identical charging profile.
Sorting through all the different specifications and matching different models to your needs can be quite a difficult challenge, but hopefully, we've helped you narrow down to a top few contenders to make your final decision.
— Austin Palmer and David Wise