$431 at Amazon
$246.98 at Amazon
$259.99 at Amazon
$179.99 at Amazon
$248.95 at Amazon
|Pros||Stylish, multitude of features, exceptional display||Easy to use, great display, impressive battery life||Looks fantastic, easy to use||Stylish, great display, comprehensive fitness tracking||Specialized fitness tracking features, good battery life|
|Cons||Very pricey, essentially limited to iOS||Giant bezel, could have more smart functions||Short battery life||Unimpressive battery life, app compatibility could be better||Expensive, not our favorite touchscreen|
|Bottom Line||We think this is by far the best option out there when it comes to wearables for your iPhone||If you don’t mind the rather ostentatious size, this is one of the best watches we have seen so far||While this watch has plenty of smart functions and is very easy to use, we think this product’s middling performance in our battery life metric precluded it from claiming one of the top spots||It’s hard to do better than the Active2 if you don’t have an iPhone, especially if you like a slimmer watch||Offering features like skin temperature, SpO2, and stress management, this is a great wearable for specialized fitness tracking but might not be the best choice for everyone|
|Rating Categories||Apple Watch Series 6||Samsung Galaxy Watch||Samsung Galaxy...||Samsung Galaxy...||Fitbit Sense|
|Ease Of Use (30%)|
|Smart Functions (20%)|
|Fitness Impact (15%)|
|Battery Life (15%)|
|Specs||Apple Watch Series 6||Samsung Galaxy Watch||Samsung Galaxy...||Samsung Galaxy...||Fitbit Sense|
|Water Resistant||5 ATM||Up to 50 meters||5 ATM||5 ATM||5 ATM|
|NFC (Android, Apple, Samsung, or Fitbit Pay)||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Display||44mm or 40mm||30mm or 33mm AMOLED||1.2-inch or 1.4-inch AMOLED||44mm (1.4") or 40mm (1.2")||1.58-inch OLED|
|Resolution||368 by 448
324 by 394
|360x360||360 x 360||360 x 360||336 x 336|
|Other sensors||Electrical heart sensor
Ambient light sensor
|Skin temperature sensor
Ambient light sensor
Electrical heart sensor
|Processor||S6 SiP with 64-bit dual-core processor||Exynos 9110 Dual core 1.15GHz||Exynos 9110 dual-core at 1.15GHz||Exynos 9110 dual-core at 1.15GHz||N/A|
Best for iPhones
Apple Watch Series 6
If you are looking for the absolute best of the best when it comes to smartwatches and you have an iPhone, then we think the Apple Watch Series 6 is easily the best option you can get. This slick and stylish wearable is packed with some of the most comprehensive smart features and functions we have seen from one of these products to date. This watch not only is one of our all-time favorite smartwatches, but it also is an exceptionally capable health and fitness tracker. The screen looks great and we think this watch is one of the most comfortable and easy to use options as well.
As you might expect, all of this performance does come at a substantial cost, and the Series 6 is one of the most expensive products in this category. Additionally, this watch is essentially limited to working with iPhones exclusively, so Android and Samsung users are going to be out of luck and will need to consider other options. We think it's a fantastic product and highly recommend it to any iPhone users who want a top-tier wearable as long as they have the budget for it.
Read review: Apple Watch Series 6
Best for Samsung Phones
Samsung Galaxy Watch
The Samsung Galaxy is an all-around impressive smartwatch. It is absolutely jam-packed with fitness tracking functions, has a solid set of smart features, and a great display, coupled with unmatched performance in our battery life test. It's also incredibly convenient and easy to use.
However, this watch is definitely on the larger side and is very noticeable on your wrist, making it a poor choice if you prefer your wearables to be a bit more on the discreet side. Available in a 46mm and 42mm bezel size, even the smaller bezel can look enormous on those with more petite wrists. Aside from that, we had a hard time finding any other major flaws with this product, easily making it our top recommendation for anyone with a Samsung smartphone who is looking for the absolute best you can get when it comes to smartwatches
Read review: Samsung Galaxy Watch
Best for Android Phones
Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3
If you have an Android phone, we feel the Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 is the best option for you. This watch is usually a little less expensive than some of the high-end Samsung or Apple watches and has a solid set of features. It's convenient and easy to use, all while looking fairly sleek and stylish. It has all the basic smart features that we would want from one of these products and has above-average battery life.
Our biggest complaint with this watch is its fairly lackluster showing in our fitness tracking metric. We didn't find the Pro 3 to be very accurate compared to the chest strap monitor and didn't impress us when it came to tracking workouts. It's a great smartwatch for Android users in our minds but we might suggest checking out a more fitness-centric model if you are planning on using your smartwatch as a fitness tracker on a regular basis.
Read review: Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3
Best Bargain for Fitness-Minded Users
Fitbit Versa 3
If you are searching for a solid smartwatch on a budget and are particularly interested in tracking your health and fitness, then we think the Versa 3 by Fitbit is a great choice. This watch has a solid set of smart functions and is fairly convenient and easy to use. We like its display and battery life but are particularly impressed with its health and fitness tracking. It has a ton of different workouts that it can track and an integrated GPS module to ensure you get the most comprehensive set of fitness data possible. It also lets you use all of the community fitness features the Fitbit app has to offer, giving you access to fun challenges with family and friends if you need more motivation.
However, the Versa 3 doesn't have the most comprehensive set of smart features compared to some of the other watches. There are fewer third-party apps that you can install and its integrated smart features aren't as useful as some of the top-tier models. Still, we think this is a great watch if you are hoping to save some cash and value the fitness-focused features present on this watch.
Read review: Fitbit Versa 3
Best Bargain Option
The TicWatch E2 sets itself apart from the rest of the group for its exceptional value. This watch runs on WearOS, allowing you to use the integrated microphone to activate the Google Assistant and control all of its features and functions. It can run standalone apps and provides access to the Google Play Store — even if you have it paired to an iPhone. This watch also has a built-in GPS and heart rate sensor which enables you access to a solid set of fitness tracking capabilities.
However, while the E2 is an exceptional value, it can't compare to the top-tier offerings from Samsung or Google and finishes at the back of the pack in terms of its overall score. This watch has a very plain — borderline boring — look, so it isn't the best choice for someone who wants a truly stylish watch. We still highly recommend it to anyone who is looking to save some cash and is ok with a relatively bare-bones and simple smart timepiece despite these flaws.
Read Full Review: TicWatch E2
Best on a Tight Budget
Mobvoi TicWatch GTX
If you are shopping for a new smartwatch on the tightest of budgets, then we think it's worth checking out the TicWatch GTX. This watch is by far one of the least expensive wearables in this category and does have some basic functions. It looks alright and is fairly easy to use, along with having a very long battery life.
However, we think the GTX is definitely not without its flaws. Overall, this wearable is considerably more limited than most of its competitors. It doesn't have the ability to install third-party apps and we found its performance in our fitness and health tracking metrics to be decently disappointing. It might be a good option if you are looking to spend as little as possible but we generally would suggest other watches if you can afford it.
Read review: Mobvoi TicWatch GTX
Why You Should Trust Us?
To decide which watch topped them all, we began with tons of research. We then picked out the most promising models to buy and test head-to-head. We bought all the watches in this review from standard retailers at normal prices; TechGearLab won't ever accept free units to review and we have no financial incentive to pick one product over another. For the past four years, our smartwatch testing process has been pioneered by Austin Palmer and David Wise. Both have extensive experience reviewing smart home and wearable products, having reviewed dozens and dozens of fitness trackers, pedometers, GPS watches, and VR headsets in addition to smartwatches.
We evaluated practically every aspect of these watches, conducting over 25 different side-by-side assessments. We measured their maximum battery life under simulated general use conditions and checked the accuracy of their step counter against a true count using a mechanical tally counter. We compared app compatibility by using a selection of the most popular offerings currently available and seeing which watches they could be installed on. We also had a panel of judges try out each product to see how comfortable they are, their ease of use, and compare the design and aesthetics of each product.
Related: How We Tested Smartwatches
Analysis and Test Results
We split our testing process into five weighted rating metrics — Ease of Use, Fitness Tracking, Smart Functions, Battery Life, and Display — which are each weighted proportional to their importance, with the results and performance of each watch compared below.
Related: Buying Advice for Smartwatches
There is a strong correlation between price and performance when it comes to these products. Our top picks, the Apple Watch Series 6 and the Samsung Galaxy are both impeccable products but the base price of these products is significantly more than most of the other products, with additional features like a larger screen or standalone LTE connectivity increasing the price even more. These products make sense if you want a ton of functionality right on your wrist but you are better off considering a less expensive model, like the Versa 3 or the TicWatch E2 if you just want something to show you notifications and have some basic fitness tracking abilities.
If these high price tags are giving you cause to panic, then you should consider the TicWatch E2. This is our favorite watch when shopping on a budget, even though it didn't score the highest overall, it offers a solid performance at a price that is a fraction of the cost of the top models. On top of that, it can usually be found at a discount and has most of the essential functions that you would want from one of these products. The Fitbit Versa 3 is another attractive budget option, especially if you are particularly interested in the fitness tracking features of these products. It is a bit more expensive than the TicWatch E2, but quite a bit better overall, as well as granting you access to the extensive Fitbit fitness ecosystem.
If you are shopping on the tightest of budgets, then we think the TicWatch GTX is your best choice. It costs considerably less than just about every other model and is limited in features but it does have basic smartwatch functions at a very attractive price.
Ease of Use
Comprising 30% of the total score for each smartwatch, our Ease of Use metric is the most significant of our entire testing process. These products are intended to be used on a daily basis and we found products that were less than user-friendly to be exceptionally irritating. We awarded points to each product based on its interface method, how difficult it is to swap the wrist bands, how quickly each watch wakes when you raise your wrist, and the overall layout of the menus.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Watch 3, and the Apple Watch Series 6 all tied for the top score in this metric, each earning an 8 out of 10. These watches all have exceptionally responsive touch screens for navigating through menus on the device and will wake up with practically zero delay when you turn your wrist to view them.
The Apple Watch Series 6 utilizes a crown scroll — the dial on the side can be rotated to scroll through menus — making it exceptionally easy to navigate quickly.
The Samsung smartwatches lack a crown scroll, instead utilizing a rotating bezel for a physical interface.
The Apple Watch Series 6 uses an inductive charger that mounts to the back of the watch with magnets. The connection is quite strong, but the charger can be knocked off with sufficient force. However, you can purchase bases for the standard charger that turns it into a charging cradle or stand if you prefer a more secure connection.
These watches are all waterproof enough to take swimming or in the shower. The Apple Watch Series 6, the Galaxy Watch, and the Galaxy Watch 3 are rated for up to 5 ATM or 50 meters of water resistance. All of these watches even have a dedicated profile for tracking your swimming workouts.
It is a little easier to take screenshots on the Apple Watch than on the Samsung Galaxy watches by pressing both buttons simultaneously, which will automatically send the photo straight to your phone.
It was very easy to swap wristbands on all of these models, taking very little time at all, though it is a tiny bit faster and easier to swap between bands on the Apple Watch. Unfortunately, it is a little more difficult to locate compatible bands for this watch than for the Samsung smartwatches, as the Apple Watch doesn't use the typical watch mechanism.
The Samsung Galaxy Active2 and the Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 came just behind the top-tier of watches when it comes to ease of use, earning a 7 out of 10. It is comparably easy to the Galaxy Watch when it comes to changing wristbands and is also water-resistant to 50 meters/5 ATM. It has a great touchscreen that is exceptionally responsive to swipes and taps and illuminates almost instantly when you raise your wrist.
However, the Active2 does away with a physical rotating bezel interface, replacing it with a capacitive touch bezel. This is still better than the touchscreen-only interfaces in our opinion but we liked it a little less than a truly mechanical one. The charging interface on this watch is also similar to the Apple Watch and is a little more prone to being accidentally knocked off than the charging cradle types.
The TicWatch Pro 3 is rated to the IP68 level of water-resistance, making it swimming pool or shower suitable. We like the touchscreen on this watch, finding it very responsive and easy to use. The bands are also quite easy to swap but it does have a slight delay when you raise your wrist.
Next, the TicWatch C2, the Fossil Q Explorist HR, the Fitbit Sense, and the Fitbit Versa 3 all earned a 6 out of 10 for being above average in terms of ease of use, but each having a few drawbacks that made them slightly more of a hassle than the top watches.
The Fitbit Versa 3 and the Fitbit Sense are both water-resistant, rated for submersion up to 50 meters, making them more than suitable for accompanying you in the shower or the pool. The chargers for both of these watches lock securely into position
It can be a bit finicky to swap the bands on the Versa 3 or the Sense. The touchscreen is quite responsive, though occasionally this pair does have a slight lag compared to the top watches when raising your wrist, being a bit slow to wake from sleep mode. There isn't any sort of physical rotational input, like a crown or bezel scroll.
The Fossil Explorist HR has a decently responsive touchscreen but also has a crown scroll as an additional input method. It's fairly easy to swap wristbands, but we did wish the charging connection was a bit more secure, being noticeably more prone to accidental disconnects than the Apple Watch Series 5 or the Galaxy Active2. It also is rated as water-resistant to 30 meters, making it suitable for tracking swimming laps or wearing in the shower.
The C2 also relies solely on a touchscreen as an input method, which we found to be a bit finicky throughout our testing, periodically misreading a tap as a swipe and vice-versa.
We also found that the C2 is one of the slower watches to wake when sleeping, taking almost a complete second for the screen to light up when we raised our wrist to look at it. We also wished that the water-resistance of this watch had been increased, as it is still only marked as rain or sweatproof, not suitable for total submergence or swimming. However, we did appreciate that it is extremely easy to swap the watch bands — almost on par with the Apple Watch Series 5 — and that the magnetically coupled charger attaches very securely, once you have it aligned.
The TicWatch E2, the Huawei Watch GT Classic, and the TicWatch GTX all earned a 5 out of 10 for their average ease of use. The TicWatch E2 and the TicWatch GTX both are rated as water-resistant for up to 5 ATM/50 meters. They lack a rotating crown or bezel, so you are restricted to using the touchscreen to navigate the menus, but the screen of both watches are quite responsive to swipes and taps, as well as waking quickly when you raise your wrist. The charging setup is so-so and we think it's about average when it comes to swapping wristbands on both watches.
The Huawei GT Classic also relies on the touchscreen as its sole input method and is water-resistant to 5 ATM.
This metric encompasses the main set of features on these products, comparing the compatibility with popular apps, whether or not you could take phone calls on your wrist, control your music, pay for things, or navigate with a built-in GPS. To test app compatibility, we picked a sample group of 10 common apps (Uber, Facebook Messenger, Spotify, Strava, IFTTT, Evernote, Shazam, Instagram, and a Twitter viewer) and tried to install them on each model. This group of tests makes up 20% of the total score.
The Apple Watch Series 6 took home the top score when it came to smart functions, earning an 8 out of 10. This model was compatible with Uber, Spotify, Facebook Messenger, Strava, IFTTT (If this, then that), Twitterific, and Shazam.
The Apple Watch Series 6 lets you take calls on your wrist, using its built-in microphone and speaker. The sound quality was about average, being able to easily hear the other party talking with your arm bent at a 90-degree angle.
This watch has a built-in GPS that will automatically turn on when the phone is out of range, as well as standalone LTE connectivity if you paid for the upgrade. It also has NFC communication and is usable with Apple Pay. This model also has music control and the capability to open Pandora from the watch itself, as well as voice control through Siri.
A set of Samsung watches all followed, with the Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Watch 3, and the Galaxy Watch Active2 all earning a 7 out of 10. These watches don't have the largest library of standalone apps compared to the Apple Watch but usually have all the most popular ones, with more being added all the time. They do work fairly well with messaging apps, offering a set of preprogrammed quick responses that you can also edit in the app.
All of these smartwatches from Samsung have an integrated speaker and microphone, allowing you to place or answer a phone call directly from your wrist without pulling out your phone. This trio also has built-in GPS and NFC modules for more accurate location data and contactless payments. There are also standalone LTE versions available if you truly want to leave your phone behind without sacrificing constant connectivity.
The Explorist HR, the Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3, and the TicWatch C2 followed, both earning a 6 out of 10. These watches run on Wear OS, so they have essentially the identical set of app compatibility. The Explorist HR is also compatible with Android Pay and has a built-in GPS, but does not have let you take calls on your wrist, lacking a speaker.
The TicWatch C2 and the TicWatch Pro 3 expand on the smart functions of the original TicWatch E, adding NFC communication so you can use it as a payment option with Google (Android) Pay. They both have a microphone for voice control and an integrated GPS modules, as well as the standard set of music controls available on the Wear OS watches. The TicWatch Pro 3 also lets you take phone calls right on the wrist.
Next, the Fitbit Sense and the Fitbit Versa 3 both earned a 5 out of 10 for their middle-of-the-road set of smart functions. Fitbit is a little late to the smartwatch game compared to Samsung or Apple but the Versa 3 and the Sense are slowly getting more and more compatible with third-party apps. They have basic music controls and can be used for transactions with Fitbit Pay. However, neither have a speaker, so you can't take calls on the watch. Both the Sense and the Versa 3 both have a built-in GPS module.
The TicWatch E2 came next, earning a 4 out of 10. The TicWatch E2 is a Wear OS watch, so it has a modest amount of third-party app compatibility, able to work with Uber, Messenger, Spotify, Strava, and IFTTT. This watch doesn't have an integrated speaker but it does have an internal microphone — mainly used for voice control features.
The E2 gives you basic control of your music and has a standalone GPS module but lacks integrated cellular or NFC modules.
Wrapping up this metric, the Huawei Watch GT Classic and the TicWatch GTX both scored at the back of the back for their meager set of smart functions. The GT Classic moved away from Wear OS to Huawei's own Lite OS, which unfortunately was accompanied by a significant reduction in smart features.
Neither appear to have any third-party app compatibility and don't allow you to take calls on your wrist. They also lack any NFC or standalone cellular unit abilities.
None of the assorted smart features on any of these products are of any use if you can't actually see the information displayed on the watch. We evaluated the screen quality, its visibility in bright light, whether or not the brightness could automatically adjust to changing light conditions, or if an always-on mode was available. We also awarded points if the screen was a complete circle and not truncated at the bottom. This metric made up 20% of the total score.
The Apple Watch Series 6, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3, and the Galaxy Watch Active2 all tied for the top spot in this metric. We think they have particularly eye-catching displays that are very easy to read in all lighting conditions.
We found that we slightly preferred the Apple Watch Series 6's OLED Retina display to the AMOLED or super AMOLED displays on the Samsung smartwatches but the overall image quality is excellent on all of them. The Apple Watch Series 6 is available with a 40mm or 44mm screen, having a resolution of 324x394 and 368x448, respectively.
It is super easy to see the screen of this watch in both bright sunlight and dimmer conditions. However, the Apple Watch will not automatically adjust the brightness but you do have the option to set the display to be always on. The Samsung watches all have both of these features.
We found the image on the Samsung watches to be very similar. It's super easy to read the display on all of these watches in even bright daylight and we found the ability to turn the backlight to be always on or to automatically adjust to be quite handy.
The Versa 3 and the Sense followed with their excellent, but still second-tier screens. The Fitbit Versa 3 and the Sense both have a very visually stunning square OLED display, measuring in at 1.58" across and having a resolution of 336x336.
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 followed, mainly hurt by how hard we think it is to read in bright light. Aside from that, its 1.4" Retina AMOLED 454x454 screen looks great. It can also be set to automatically adjust its brightness or can set to be always on.
Next, the Fossil Explorist HR, the TicWatch C2, the E2, and the Huawei GT Classic all merited a 6 out of 10 for their slightly above average displays. Both of these watches have essentially the same size display and are about the same in image quality — good, but noticeably worse than the Apple Watch or Samsung Galaxy. The TicWatch C2 has a 1.3" AMOLED display. It's reasonably high quality, improving on the display of its predecessors, but still can't quite compare to the Retina or Super AMOLED displays of the best models.
The E2 has a similar display but is slightly higher quality than the C2. It has a 1.39" AMOLED displays with a resolution of 400x400, compared to the 360x360 of the C2. The Huawei also has a 1.39" AMOLED screen but has an even higher resolution of 454x454.
All of these except the Huawei GT have an always-on mode available, but the TicWatch C2 and the E2 can't automatically adjust the backlight brightness to ambient lighting conditions. Additionally, none of these are all that easy to read in bright daylight.
The TicWatch GTX again finished at the back of the group. The screen is on the smaller side and we found it to be decently hard to read in bright light. You also can't set the backlight to automatically adjust or to be always-on.
Next, we moved on to comparing and scoring the various fitness tracking and monitoring features each watch offers, which is responsible for 15% of the final score. We based scores on the accuracy of the step counter — as determined by comparing the count show on each watch to our manual count over a mile-long walk, which workouts each watch can track and what data they collect, how accurately they track the number of stairs climbed each day, and the accuracy of the heart rate monitor by comparing the measured reading against a chest strap control HR monitor.
Taking home the top score in this metric, the Series 6 earned a 9 out of 10 for its excellence fitness tracking performance. This watch was exceptionally accurate in our step count tests, having an average discrepancy from the true count of fewer than 10 steps in our three mile-long walk. Its heart rate monitor aligned almost perfectly with the chest strap monitor we used as a control when measuring a resting heart rate and was accurate about 85% of the time with an elevated heart rate. The Series 6 also has an ECG and can detect if you are going into Atrial Fibrillation.
The Series 6 also has a ton of different profiles to choose from when it comes to tracking your activities and provides a solid amount of data about your workout, as well as automatically detecting if you start or stop a workout. However, this watch only registered about half of the staircases that we climbed in our test.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch, the Watch 3, the Active2, the Fitbit Versa 3, and the Fitbit Sense all tied for the runner-up position, each earning a score of 8 out of 10 for their fitness tracking features. All of these watches are highly accurate at counting steps, with the largest discrepancy for any of these watches being about 34 steps in any of our mile-long walking tests. This group also delivered solidly accurate results in our heart rate, though we found all except the Watch 3 to be more prone to being off with an elevated heart rate than the Series 6.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch and the Watch 3 are the clear winner when it comes to workout tracking, having the most different profiles and automatically detecting if you start being active and recording it and even chain together up to 6 different exercises if you switch activities mid-workout.
However, these Samsung watches all fare poorly when it came to counting flights of stairs climbed, with only the S3 even coming close to recording all 10 flights of stairs we climbed in the test.
The Fitbit Versa 3 and the Sense also have a ton of different workout profiles that you can choose from. This pair also has a ton of different fitness challenges you can undertake against yourself or family/friends if you need a little more motivation.
The TicWatch E2, the Huawei GT Classic, the Explorist HR came next, each receiving a 6 out of 10 for their decent fitness-tracking abilities.
The Explorist was highly accurate in our step tracking tests, only deviating from the true count by about 8 steps in its worst trial. However, it was much more erratic when it came to measuring heart rate and does not track the number of stairs you climb. This watch runs on Wear OS and used the Google Fit app for workout tracking, which provides a respectable amount of different workouts that you can track and a solid set of recorded stats.
The E2 was decently accurate in our step count tests, only differing from the true manual count by 10-30 steps or so over a mile-long walk. However, it wasn't the most accurate heart rate monitor that we have seen so far, tending to have a discrepancy of up to 10 bpm at a resting heart rate in our tests. It got even more erratic with an elevated heart rate while working out, exhibiting a discrepancy of 42 bpm at one point in our tests.
It also has a ton of different workout profiles in the Google Fit Workout app but does not count the number of flights of stairs you climb throughout your day.
The Huawei GT was equally accurate in our step counting tests as the TicWatch E2 but we thought it was just a little bit less accurate in our heart rate assessments. It was about the same as the E2 at a resting heart rate but was wildly inaccurate compared to the chest strap while exercising. It also has a modest amount of workout profiles and lacks an altimeter to track flights of stairs climbed.
The TicWatch C2 is about average in terms of fitness tracking functions, earning a 5 out of 10. It does have a fairly accurate step counter and a decent suite of different workouts you can track, either by using the default Google Fit app or a third-party app, like Strava or Runkeeper. It also will try and auto-detect the type of workout you are doing, though it does need a bit of training before it starts to work correctly.
However, this watch does not monitor the number of stairs you climb each day and there was usually a huge discrepancy between the chest strap heart rate monitor and the heart rate recorded by the C2 in our tests, particularly with active heart rates.
The TicWatch Pro 3 and the TicWatch GTX finished out the back of the group in this metric. They did alright in the step counting test but disappointed us in the heart rate monitor and workout tracking tests.
Similar to our display metric, none of the various features and functions of these products are any good when the battery is dead. We tested how long each watch lasted with normal use, how long it would take to completely charge a dead watch, and how long it would take to charge to 50%, all combining to be worth 15% of the overall score for each smartwatch. This is because the batteries in these watches don't charge linearly, and will rapidly charge up most of the way, then slow down to top off. We sent a variety of notifications, texts, and calls to each watch throughout the test on an identical schedule for each model and recorded how long they lasted.
Delivering an unmatched performance, the Huawei Watch GT Classic easily claimed the top spot for this metric, earning a 10 out of 10. This watch did significantly better than the rest, lasting for 1.5 - 2 weeks in our tests but its smart features are so limited compared to the rest that it almost seems unfair to compare them. It also charges exceptionally fast, only taking about 30 minutes to reach 50% from being completely depleted and 87 minutes to completely recharge.
The Samsung Galaxy, the Fitbit Versa 3, and the Fitbit Sense all followed, earning a 9 out of 10 lasted for their exceptional battery life. The Samsung Galaxy lasted for a whopping 118 hours in our test, or just shy of five days — solidly impressive for a watch that has a decent set of smart functions. It also states that you can get up to 24 hours of use from the GPS with a fully-charged battery. However, this watch does take a long time to charge, taking over an hour to reach 50% and almost three to completely recharge.
The Fitbit Sense and the Versa 3 both charge decently fast and last for around 6 days with normal use. The TicWatch GTX performed similarly, lasting for around 7 days, largely buoyed by its limited functionality.
The Galaxy Active2 by Samsung and the TicWatch Pro 3 performed a bit better than average, both meriting it a 6 out of 10. The Active2 lasted for approximately 48 hours with typical use. We also like that it doesn't take too long to recharge, completely charging in 105 minutes and only taking 40 minutes to hit 50% charge when starting with a fully depleted battery. The Pro 3 is similar, lasting for around 40-44 hours in our tests.
The Apple Watch Series 6 and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 were neck and neck with the Pro 3 in our tests, lasting for around 36-40 hours.
The TicWatch C2, and the TicWatch E2 all earned a 5 out of 10 for their average battery life. The TicWatch E2 lasted for about 25 hours in our normal usage test — one of the shortest times of the group. This means you might get 2 days out of the watch, but most likely you are going to want to charge it every night or at some point every day. However, this model does charge quite quickly, only taking about 32 minutes to hit 50% and 75 minutes to completely top off a dead battery.
The C2 is about the same, though it usually lasts 3-5 hours longer than the E2 and has a roughly identical charging profile.
Sorting through all the different specifications and matching different models to your needs can be quite a difficult challenge, but hopefully, we've helped you narrow down to a top few contenders to make your final decision.
— Austin Palmer and David Wise