Reviews You Can Rely On

The 5 Best Mixing Bowls

We put mixing bowls to the test from trusted brands like Cuisinart, PriorityChef, OXO, Pyrex, and others to find the best products for your kitchen
gearlab tested logo
Best Mixing Bowl Review
Credit: Jane Jackson

Our Top Picks

By Jane Jackson ⋅ Review Editor  ⋅  Jul 10, 2023

The Best Mixing Bowls


Our kitchen experts bought nine of the best mixing bowl sets on the market for hands-on side-by-side testing. If it's time to slim down and simplify that collection of old mixing bowls in your cupboard, our in-depth and unique testing procedures are designed to assess the functionality of these baking sets in full. We made cookies, scrambled eggs, tossed salads, and mixed cakes in each of these bowls in order to rank the best and worst on the market. We assessed each product across a range of performance metrics to help you find the best upgrade for your kitchen.

If you're an avid baker, we've tested a variety of products that can make your time in the kitchen more fun, from different styles of cake pans to baking sheets and top-tier cooling racks. We've also tested the top-rated mixers, including hand mixers and stand mixers, to take the guesswork out of deciding which products are worth your money. When it's time for cleaning up, check out our top choice dishwasher pods.

Editor's Note: We edited this review for clarity on July 10, 2023.


1
2

Best Overall Mixing Bowl Set


Cuisinart Stainless Steel Set With Lids


Number of Bowls: 3 | Materials: Stainless Steel
REASONS TO BUY
Durable, simple design
Lids are secure and store easily
Useful sizes and shape
REASONS TO AVOID
Largest size could be limiting
Deep shape not ideal for whisking

The Cuisinart Stainless Steel Set With Lids is our top choice thanks to its sleek and simple design, and we wound up reaching for this set the most often in our kitchen. This set comes with three bowls: a 1.5-Qt, a 3-Qt, and a 5-Qt, each with an accompanying lid that is secure and easy to use. We found that these bowls were conveniently sized — deep enough to contain splashes and spray when whisking while still allowing for room to toss a salad or mix up a slaw without spillage. Though they don't have a silicone bottom, they were surprisingly stable. The bowls nest well, and the lids fit securely, making for easy storage.

Though we appreciated the fact that this set only came with three bowls, some folks may be seeking a larger set with more size options. Also, the largest size in this set is a 5-quart bowl, which could be a bit small for large batches of cookies or massive salads. If you know you need a jumbo mixing bowl or often cook in large batches, this Cuisinart set might not cut it for your needs.

mixing bowl - mixing cookies in the cuisinart stainless. this set rocked most...
Mixing cookies in the Cuisinart Stainless. This set rocked most baking tasks.
Credit: Jane Jackson

2
2

Best Mixing Bowls on a Budget


Sagler Stainless Steel Set of 6


Best Buy Award
mixing bowl
Best Buy Award
Number of Bowls: 6 | Materials: Stainless Steel
REASONS TO BUY
Great for pepping large meals
Lots of size options
Wide, stable base
Affordable
REASONS TO AVOID
Cumbersome to store

The Sagler Stainless Steel Set of 6 is a great starter option for a new apartment or if you're simply looking for a great deal. This basic mixing bowl set has six bowls of varying sizes, with the largest measuring 8 quarts. This set is versatile and easy to store. The bowls have a wide, flat base that provides stability when mixing vigorously, and the sides of the bowls are shallow, which is great for making large salads and whisking. We also appreciate that this set comes with six bowls, yet it costs half the price of many other options on the market. The bowls nest well and have a large lip which is helpful when tilting the bowl for pouring or whisking.

Though their flat base makes them stable, this design feature also detracts from the aesthetics of this set. We found that the flat-bottomed bowls in this set were great for stability and for things like pasta salad, but were a bit of a nuisance when it came to more advanced baking techniques.

mixing bowl - the flat-based sagler set was suprisingly stable and very versatile.
The flat-based Sagler set was suprisingly stable and very versatile.
Credit: Jane Jackson

3
2

Best Budget Set with Lids


Wildone Stainless Nesting


Number of Bowls: 5 | Materials: Stainless Steel, Silicone, Plastic
REASONS TO BUY
Comes with 5 bowls and lids
Stable base
Good variety of sizes
REASONS TO AVOID
Cumbersome to store
Lids are not the most secure

Looking for a robust bowl set with plastic lids and a silicone base, but don't want to spend the extra “dough” on the premium brands? The Wildone Stainless Nesting could be your answer. With five bowls in the set, ranging from .63-quarts to 5 quarts, the Wildone has a satisfactory range of size options. These bowls performed similarly to some of our favorites while costing much less. We liked the stability their silicone bases provided and actually appreciated the grating attachments that come with the set.

The major downside to the Wildone Stainless Nesting set is its storage capabilities. Because there are so many accessories — three grater attachments and lids for all five bowls, storing these bowls can be a real hassle. We also found that the lids were not the most secure we tested, and often we had to work hard to get them to really stick.

mixing bowl - the lids on the wildone set are not the most secure. at least we...
The lids on the Wildone set are not the most secure. At least we were able to fit all the accessories inside the largest bowl for storage.
Credit: Jane Jackson

4
2

Best for Baking


OXO Good Grips 3-Piece Mixing Set


Number of Bowls: 3 | Materials: Stainless Steel
REASONS TO BUY
Super stable
Large lip
Simple
REASONS TO AVOID
Silicone base limits versatility
No lids

Our go-to for baking was hands-down the OXO Good Grips 3-Piece Mixing Set. This set contains three sizes: 1.5-quart, 3-quart, and 5-quart. This baker's workhorse set is sturdy, stable, and can handle any whipping, whisking, and mixing you throw at it. We loved their solid stainless-steel feel and their large lip, which provided a great handle when tipping the bowls on their sides. The simplicity of this set was also a major highlight for us — no lids, no extra parts to worry about. They are sleek and stylish and have a deep shape that caters to baking over salad making. Also, their small silicone base makes them feel solid on any countertop.

The silicone base can be nice non-slip feature, but it can also be a downside depending on your intended use. Because of this feature, the OXO Good Grips Stainless bowls do not function well as a double boiler. For some, this is a hard pass, but for others, the OXO may be useful enough for all other baking endeavors to look the other way. We were in the second camp and had no problem using another vessel for double-boiling situations.

mixing bowl - the hefty lip on the oxo bowls made touch-and-go transfers, like the...
The hefty lip on the OXO bowls made touch-and-go transfers, like the one shown here, easy.
Credit: Jane Jackson

5
2

Best for Stability


PriorityChef Premium 5-Piece Set


Number of Bowls: 5 | Materials: Stainless Steel
REASONS TO BUY
Solid feel
Versatile set
Stable silicone base
REASONS TO AVOID
Cumbersome lids
Difficult to store

The PriorityChef Premium 5-Piece Set impressed us right away simply by the way they felt in our hands. This set comes with five bowls, all with lids and silicone bases. The PriorityChef bowls kept us organized while also providing a solid base for vigorous mixing. We used the smallest 1.5-quart bowl for dressings. Many of the other small bowls we tested moved around a ton when mixing dressing, but this bowl did not. We also like the 5-quart mixer for making cookies and bread since its secure bottom and hefty stainless-steel sides allowed us to knead and mix thick dough easily.

The downside to the PriorityChef set really comes down to the accompanying lids. We found them challenging to store and often caused a headache when digging around in the cupboard. The sets with over three bowls plus lids start to feel a bit overwhelming, especially if the lids do not store inside the largest bowl easily. Without the lids, this set would rank as one of our favorites.

mixing bowl - the lids don't fit well inside the largest bowl, making storage a...
The lids don't fit well inside the largest bowl, making storage a pain.
Credit: Jane Jackson

6
2

Great Set for Salad Prep


FineDine Stainless Set of 6


Number of Bowls: 6 | Materials: Stainless Steel
REASONS TO BUY
Large capacity
Versatile sizes
Shallow shape great for mixing large ingredients
Reasonably priced
REASONS TO AVOID
Hard to store

The FineDine Stainless mixing set is a great option for those who need to prepare large quantities of food. The largest bowl in this set has an 8-quart capacity, which equates to a very large salad. The smaller bowls are very useful for the prep stages, and the large bowl is big enough to contain a side dish ready for dozens of dinner guests. The shallow sides of these bowls make it easy to incorporate sauces into potato or pasta salad without too much chance of spillage. The large lip on the FineDine bowls also helps when combining ingredients or scooping out contents when the bowl is tilted. We often used one of the bowls in this set as our receptacle for compost when preparing a large veggie dish. The large bowls in this set also work great as a vessel for tossing veggies pre-oven roast.

We had very few complaints about the FineDine Stainless set. If anything, we felt that this set was too large to store in our cupboard without a ton of adjusting. Though the largest bowl is great for parties and group gatherings, folks who aren't normally preparing food for a large group may not need such a big mixing bowl most of the time.

mixing bowl - prepping slaw for our "ease of use" test. shallow bowls, like the...
Prepping slaw for our “ease of use” test. Shallow bowls, like the FineDine, did better for encorperating large ingredients.
Credit: Jane Jackson

7
2

Best Glass Set


Pyrex Glass 3-Piece Set


Number of Bowls: 3 | Materials: Glass
REASONS TO BUY
Heat-safe materials
Stable
Classic appearance and design
REASONS TO AVOID
Set is too small

No mixing bowl review would be complete without a discussion of the classic Pyrex Set. For this review, we tested the Pyrex set of three bowls, with a 1-quart, a 1.5-quart, and a 2.5-quart version. These bowls are sturdy, stable, and ubiquitous in most kitchens. We were big fans of these bowls when prepping meals for one or two people. Their open shape is deep enough to mix wet ingredients without too much splattering, but they also work well as serving bowls for salads on a casual weeknight. It's an added plus that this set is microwave safe and very affordable.

The biggest disappointment with this set is its size. The largest bowl has only a 2.5-quart capacity, which is fairly small for baking. We love using large Pyrex bowls for baking, especially bread, but this set didn't have the capacity we needed to take on most baking projects.

mixing bowl - these bowls, though we love the materials used and aesthetic, were...
These bowls, though we love the materials used and aesthetic, were too small to successfully prepare much of anything.
Credit: Jane Jackson

8
2

Plastic Bowls for Potlucks


Cook With Color Plastic 12-Piece Set


Number of Bowls: 6 | Materials: Plastic
REASONS TO BUY
Inexpensive
Lots of size options
Great for transporting meals
Lightweight
REASONS TO AVOID
Lids are annoying to store
Wobbly and unstable for mixing

We only included one plastic set in this review because the list of benefits to using stainless steel is long and fairly obvious. But, we figured that we should include one plastic option, just to see how it compared in our side-by-side tests. The Cook With Color Plastic 12-Piece Set includes six bowls, all with plastic lids. This set was nice because it felt versatile — the tiny bowls and their lids doubled as storage containers for leftovers. We were into the wide range of sizes that come in this set, with the largest holding 5.8-quarts and the smallest only .32-quarts. The bigger bowls in this set would work great for potlucks and group dinners, where transporting a side dish in a vessel with a lid is key.

We didn't like mixing batters in these bowls since they lacked stability, and scraping batter and dough off the walls was more difficult. We felt that they were much more suited for potato salad, slaw, or pasta sides rather than baking. In terms of storage, this set of six bowls and their accompanying lids started to feel pretty overwhelming in the cupboard. The lids were not super secure, with only a narrow lip to attach them to the bowl. Most of the other lidded options had more secure lids, which we preferred.

mixing bowl - these plastic bowls are best suited for transporting sides and...
These plastic bowls are best suited for transporting sides and salads to potlucks. We didn't like baking with them.
Credit: Jane Jackson

9
2

Simple Stainless Option for Baking


Regiller Stainless Steel Nesting Bowls


Number of Bowls: 5 | Materials: Stainless Steel
REASONS TO BUY
Silicone base adds stability
Colors are fun and unique
Simple design with multiple size options
REASONS TO AVOID
Silicone seemed to de-laminate
Expensive

The Regiller Stainless Steel Nesting Bowls is a simple and stable set of five bowls. The mixing bowls have silicone bases, which helps them stay in place during vigorous mixing and whisking. They also have a deep shape that helps contain spills and splatters. During our shredding test, these bowls were impressively stable — the 2.5-quart bowl hardly moved at all when shredding carrots into it. We also liked that the colors add a bit of flair without being overpowering. Since they don't have lids, the Regiller bowls are easy to store and don't take up too much room.

We had a small issue with the silicone base on these bowls. Unlike some of the other silicone-bottomed sets, we noticed a small gap forming between the silicone and the stainless steel after a few washes. This is a bit of a red flag since that space is a trap for mold and bacteria.

mixing bowl - the colorful bottoms shown here during testing.
The colorful bottoms shown here during testing.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Why Trust GearLab


We researched dozens of mixing bowls before settling on the 9 sets we purchased for our review. We then tested them by integrating them into our daily routine of preparing and cooking homemade meals. We used them to mix dough for our daily bread loaves and to toss vegetables in oil and salt prior to roasting. Small bowls were used to keep our meal prep station organized when making lasagna or salad for friends and family. Additionally, we conducted multiple specific tests to assess each bowl's performance in a series of thoughtfully crafted rating metrics, focusing on the size and shapes of the bowls, as well as their stability, ease of use, and included accessories like lids.

mixing bowl - our lead tester's dream come true - baking cookies for a living.
Our lead tester's dream come true - baking cookies for a living.
Credit: Jane Jackson

As far back as she can remember, our lead tester Jane Jackson has always loved to bake. Whether it was filming mock cooking shows at age nine, baking elaborate cakes for friends' birthdays, or an ongoing obsession with pies in the summertime, there's rarely a time when Jane isn't excited about baking. Besides being an enthusiastic amateur baker, she is also a seasoned product reviewer who has written detailed reviews of products ranging from bath towels to water bottles to hiking boots. In her free hours, she loves spending time in the kitchen, where she can often be found whipping up salads, slaws, cookies, and other baked goods.


Analysis and Test Results


Though we integrated the mixing bowls into our daily kitchen routine, we also made sure to develop a standardized set of tests to rank each set's performance as objectively as possible. We considered each set's bowl shape and size, their countertop stability, overall ease of use, and finally, the performance and usefulness of any accessories included in the set. With each set, we prepared a cabbage slaw, which allowed us to assess the shape of the bowls and their ability to toss salads and contain large ingredients. This also allowed us to perform a stability test as we grated carrots into each bowl. Next, we made cookies in each bowl set to assess their ability to contain dough. We then looked at each set's size, shape, and lid components, if any, to finalize our scores.

Size and Shape


Each set comes with a certain number of bowls, and each set is a unique shape. We took note of how many bowls were in each set before moving on to assessing the shape and size of each. Next, we recorded the reported volume of each bowl so that we could compare them side by side. All of the sets we tested included 3 to 6 bowls; most had either 3 or 5 different-sized bowls. For simplicity's sake, we appreciated the sets that came with three sizes, like the Cuisinart Stainless Steel. This product comes with three bowls of varying sizes and lids. We also liked the OXO Good Grips Stainless set, which also includes three bowls.

For prepping salads or following more elaborate recipes, sets with five or six bowls can come in handy. We especially liked the PriorityChef 5-Piece with its secure lids and smaller bowl sizes. Sets that include six bowls, plus lids, started to get a little out of control for us. Simply putting the bowls away started to feel like playing with a Russian doll set, and we often found the lids to be cumbersome extras rather than useful accessories. This was especially true with the Cook With Color Plastic set, which boasts 12 pieces — bowls and lids included.

mixing bowl - the low-angle sagler on the left and the deeper wildone on the right.
The low-angle Sagler on the left and the deeper Wildone on the right.
Credit: Jane Jackson

The shape of each set differs, and some shapes are suited to some tasks better than others. Deep bowls are great for containing ingredients and mixing doughs, but bowls with sloped sizes are more useful for folding and whisking. This is because they allow for more airflow and a wider range of motion, which is required for mixing airy batters. Our favorite shallow bowl sets were the Sagler Stainless and the FineDine. These both include six bowls that are wide enough to toss salads or whip cream into nice peaks with ease. The Pyrex Glass 3-piece set had a similar shape, but the bowls were too small to really prepare anything substantial.

mixing bowl - we liked the oxo good grips bowls for mixing doughs because of their...
We liked the OXO Good Grips bowls for mixing doughs because of their size.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Stability


To assess stability, we used two different testing procedures. First off, we conducted our slaw-making test, which included shredding carrots into a bowl using a vertical grater. Bowls that fell short in this metric moved around a lot when we tried to grate carrots into them. Next, we mixed up cookie dough in the bowls since this firm dough requires a bit of force to incorporate the flour into the butter and sugar mixture. The sets that excelled in this metric were the OXO Good Grips Stainless and the PriorityChef, both with silicone bases. The Cuisinart Stainless was close behind, which surprised us since it lacks a silicone base. That said, the Cuisinart has heft and solid sides that help it stick to countertops more easily.

mixing bowl - grating carrots was a great stability test - it requires a lot of...
Grating carrots was a great stability test - it requires a lot of downward pressure and a stable base to keep the bowl, the grater, and the carrot from sliding around.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Both the Wildone and the Regiller Stainless also have silicone bases, which made them rank highly in terms of stability. The Sagler set, though aesthetically not super appealing, has a wide, flat bottom that makes it surprisingly stable. The lowest-scoring product in this metric was the Cook With Color set, which was plastic and wobbly.

mixing bowl - a silicone base vs. a stainless steel base.
A silicone base vs. a stainless steel base.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Ease of Use


For this metric, we considered how well the bowls contained salad ingredients when tossed, in addition to ease of stacking and storage. A shallow bowl that spills its contents is not easy to use, nor does it do its job very well. The top products in this metric are the Cuisinart Stainless and the OXO Good Grips 3-Piece. Shortly behind are the Regiller Stainless, the PriorityChef, and the FineDine sets. The top-ranking sets were deep enough to hold the contents of a salad without spillage. We also appreciated the simplicity of these two sets. They each contain three bowls that nest easily, making them easy to store. The FineDine set was also a top performer — their shape was a nice middle ground between the bowls with low-angle sides and the deeper ones, like the PriorityChef. Our top-ranking bowls in this metric are great for doughs and salads, but the Regiller Stainless is our go-to for whisking since it is shallower and allows for a good range of motion when whipping, whisking, or folding.

mixing bowl - some bowls are better for baking, while others work great for mixing...
Some bowls are better for baking, while others work great for mixing up salads and slaws. These deep-sided bowls are great for cookie dough.
Credit: Jane Jackson

The size of the sets stored added to their ranking in this metric. With this in consideration, the Cook With Color and the Sagler sets received lower scores since they were so big and cumbersome. It was hard to find space in the cupboard for such massive bowls, especially the Cook With Color set, since it came with six lids.

mixing bowl - a bowl any larger than these 5-quart mixers would be difficult to...
A bowl any larger than these 5-Quart mixers would be difficult to squeeze into a dishwasher.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Accessories


We went into a more detailed assessment of the lids and other accessories in this comparison. Four of the sets in this review came with lids, and some worked better than others. The best lid design that we encountered was on the Cuisinart Stainless set. These lids are secure and reliable, plus each bowl fits inside the other with lids on for easy and convenient storage. The PriorityChef set also came with lids that were similarly secure and easy to use.

mixing bowl - using the accompanying grater fitting from the wildone set. these...
Using the accompanying grater fitting from the Wildone set. These accessories are not necessary, but some were very convenient.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Our least favorite accessories came with the Cook With Color and the Wildone sets. The Cook With Color lids are flimsy and thin, with a tiny lip meant to secure them in place. One trip through the dishwasher, and these lids don't fit anymore. The Wildone lids also fit over the top of the bowl rather than inside, which is an issue for storage and security. This set also comes with a few grater attachments for the smallest bowl. We actually liked this feature but found that these graters didn't work quite as well as a traditional box grater.

mixing bowl - the cuisinart, above, is an example of a very secure and durable lid...
The Cuisinart, above, is an example of a very secure and durable lid design.
Credit: Jane Jackson

Conclusion


Many factors go into separating a good mixing bowl from a great mixing bowl. This review is designed to get into the nitty-gritty of bowl design and to parse out the features that work and those that don't. Ideally, a single mixing bowl set that is versatile, sturdy, and durable is the ticket to home-cooking success. Lids, silicone bases, and lip shape and size are all features that were under scrutiny during this review. Bowls that didn't function well fell to the bottom of the pack, while those with solid feature sets and a durable build rose to the top. From cupcakes to cookies to salads and slaws, this review should not only inspire you but also guide you to the right mixing bowl set to suit your baking needs.

Jane Jackson