Searching for a quick and easy way to keep your floors squeaky clean? After looking at over 65 different stick vacuums, we purchased the top 14 stick vacuums on the market today and pitted them head-to-head to see which one truly swept the competition under the rug. We evaluated and scored both the carpet and hard surface cleaning capabilities of each product, as well as how convenient and easy to use they are, as no one wants a vacuum that is a huge hassle. While it can be hard to sort through all the marketing blitz to find the perfect stick vacuum for your needs, we make it easy to find the absolute best product for your needs and budget. Take a look at the full review below to see which vacuum came out on top and which ones give the best performance without sucking your bank account dry.
The Best Stick Vacuums of 2018
Dyson has recently released the V10 Absolute, so we bought it to add to our existing lineup. This new product did exceptionally well, delivering a phenomenal performance in our cleaning tests, all while being extremely convenient and easy to use. In fact, this vacuum performed so well that it earned the highest score that we have seen to date, claiming the top spot and toppling our previous award winner, the Shark IONFlex. However, this amazing performance definitely comes at a price, with the V10 being the most expensive product by far. Take a look at the full review below to see exactly how the V10 performed and make the call if you think it is worth the price.
Dyson V10 Absolute
Earning the highest score we have ever seen, the Dyson V10 easily claimed an Editors' Choice Award to assume the mantle of Best Overall Stick Vacuum. This product handles all types of messes on both hard and soft floors with ease, offering some of the best performances that we have seen from these products when it comes to cleaning messes on carpet. This model is also exceptionally easy to use and is a very convenient way to keep your floors sparkling. If you want unparalleled cleaning ability from a stick vacuum, then the V10 is the obvious choice.
However, this is also one of the most expensive products that we have seen in this category, retailing for around $700. This exceptionally high price makes the V10 well out of most people's budget for supplemental cleaning appliance. Regardless of that, it is the best of the best — if you can afford it.
Read Full Review: Dyson V10 Absolute
A Close Second
Our previous top pick before being bested by the V10, the IONFlex is an excellent, all-around stick vacuum that is a close second to the V10 in terms of performance, but retails for less than half the price. This cordless vacuum performed extremely well in our hard floor cleaning tests. This model fold for easy storage and has swappable batteries, so your runtime is only limited by the number of additional batteries that you have. The IONFlex includes a handful of attachments and has the versatility to clean practically anywhere in your home and is highly maneuverable and easy to operate.
However, while this vacuum is much less expensive than the V10, it is still quite pricey, retailing for around $300. This can be exceptionally more than most people may be willing to spend for one of these products, as for many, a stick vacuum is supplemental cleaning tool to be paired with a full-size vacuum, rather than their sole cleaning method. It's also a little on the heavy side for a cordless vacuum, but it is still an excellent product overall, especially if you want the best but refuse to spend the $700 for the Dyson V10.
Read Full Review: Shark IONFlex
Shark Rocket DuoClean
Earning the highest score of the overall group and claiming the title of Best Overall Stick Vacuum, the Shark Rocket DuoClean is the best of the best and our top recommendation for most people. This premium corded stick vacuum is extraordinarily easy to use, with the cleaning power to rival plenty of upright vacuums. It does an exceptional job of collecting debris and cleaning up messes from hard floors and a great one on carpet. It's agile and easy to maneuver, with tons of versatility to clean all of the hard to reach places around your home.
Our only slight issue with this product is that it is a little on the heavy side. Additionally, while the corded component of this vacuum means you have unlimited runtime while cleaning, it is undeniably much more cumbersome than the cordless models. However, we would readily recommend this product as one of our favorites. It does a solid job of cleaning your home and retails for much less than the top-tier products.
Read Full Review: Shark Rocket DuoClean
Best Bang for the Buck
Searching for a cordless stick vacuum and don't want to spend hundreds of dollars? The Deik won't disappoint, performing quite well across the board and earning the Best Buy award for being a great value. This Dyson V6 clone does a good job of keeping carpets and hard floors clean and is one of the most convenient vacuums to use to clean up small messes quickly, having an impressive battery life considering its weight and cost,
It doesn't quite match the cleaning performance of the top models and is a little more difficult to use. It also isn't quite as convenient, but, on the whole, it delivers a more than acceptable performance making it the best bet for those shopping on a budget and don't want to spend over $150 for a new stick vacuum.
Read Full Review: Deik ZB1516
Good for a Tight Budget
VonHaus 600W 2-in-1
The VonHaus 600W 2-in-1 definitely isn't the best stick vacuum that we looked at, but it does have its place. This model would be a solid choice for someone shopping on a tight budget and is primarily cleaning a smaller home with hard floors. This model can also transform into a handheld vacuum to get all of those hard to reach places.
Unfortunately, this product simply lacks the raw cleaning power that the top models have. Despite this mediocre cleaning performance, this model is still a solid choice if you are shopping on a tight budget, being the best product that we have found that retails for less than $100 in this category of cleaning tools.
Read Full Review: VonHaus 600W 2-in-1
Analysis and Test Results
To see which stick vacuum came out on top of the pack and swept the competition under the rug, we devised a challenging series of tests to evaluate the performance of these products side-by-side. Totaling over 20, these tests were divided among four weighted rating metrics: Convenience, Hard Surface Cleaning, Ease of Use, and Carpet Cleaning. The performance in these metrics resulted in a final score ranging from 0-100 for each vacuum, with the sections below giving more detail about how each vacuum did and how it stacks up against the competition.
As you can see from the above chart, the top vacuums come at a bit of a premium price, notably the Dyson V10 and the Dyson V8. The Shark Rocket gives you the best bang for the buck of the top-tier vacuums, but it is a corded model — a dealbreaker for some people. The Diek is the overall best value, retailing at a fraction of the cost of the V10 or the Shark IONFlex and performing only marginally worse in our tests.
While you may be a bit surprised that the cleaning prowess of these products isn't first, we found convenience to be king for these products. The main advantage of these products over a traditional canister or upright vacuum is their substantially superior convenience factor and ease of use — hence the higher weight on this metric. This metric, accounting for a whopping 35% of the overall score for each product — encompassed tests where we compared and scored how well each vacuum cleaned non-floor areas of your home, the battery life of the cordless models and the reach of the corded ones, each product's weight, and it's storage method.
Tying for the top score of the entire group in this metric, the Dyson V10 Absolute, the Dyson V8 Absolute, Shark IONFlex, Deik, Dibea, and the Dyson V6 all earned a 7 out of 10 when it came to convenience. These vacuums are all cordless, with the trio of Dysons, Dibea, and the Deik having a convenient wall mounted storage system to keep them out of the way when not in use. The Shark IONFlex folds in half for convenient, standing storage in an out of the way locations.
All of the Dysons also do well very well at cleaning surfaces other than floors, though the V10 and the V8 have a slight edge over the V6 with the myriad of cleaning attachments included.
However, none of the Dyson stick vacuums have a particularly impressive battery life — at least on maximum power. All three of them lasted less than 10 minutes in our test — quite a bit less than some of the other cordless models that we looked out.
However, the runtime can be significantly extended by running on a lower power cleaning mode, which we found to be more than enough to clean up most messes, especially in the case of the V10. In fact, we actually had a hard time pushing the V10 on the low-pile carpet when it was in its maximum power mode, as the suction is so strong.
This trio of products from Dyson are all about average in terms of weight, both weighing between 4-6 lbs.
The Deik weighs about the same, but had a much more impressive battery life, lasting slightly over double the amount of time when running on its maximum power setting.
The IONFlex is a little on the heavier side, weighing in closer to 9 lbs, but has a battery life of almost 12 minutes. Both the IONFlex and the Deik are quite effective at cleaning non-floor areas of your home as well, though not quite as proficient as the Dyson V10 or V8 with their plethora of attachments.
The Dibea weights about a half pound less than the Deik and has a comparable battery life of 26 minutes to the Deik's 28. It also has the necessary attachments to clean the rest of your home beside the floors and takes a little over four hours to charge.
Next, the quartet of the BLACK+DECKER, Eufy HomeVac, Hoover Linx, Bissell AirRam, and the Shark Rocket DuoClean all earned a 6 out of 10 in this metric. The Eufy, Hoover, Bissell, and BLACK+DECKER are all cordless, while the Shark Rocket is corded. The AirRam actually had the longest battery life of the entire group, lasting for 35 minutes at full power, with the Eufy lasting just over 26 minutes, the Hoover lasting for just over 21 minutes, and the BLACK+DECKER calling it quits at just over 16 minutes. The Shark Rocket has the longest reach of the group of cordless models, shown in the following chart.
However, the Shark Rocket is the best of this bunch at cleaning non-floor surfaces — on par with the Dyson V10. The Rocket includes a ton of different attachments that are very easy to swap out.
The BLACK+DECKER can transform into a handheld vacuum, while the Hoover Linx, AirRam, and the Eufy HomeVac are restricted to upright mode only. However, the Hoover and the Eufy are free-standing, with the Eufy having the option for a wall mount. The BLACK+DECKER and the AirRam are stable enough to be freestanding, while the Rocket is primarily meant to be wall mounted — though you can detach the top and hang it towards the base, providing enough support for this model to stand without support.
The Eufy, BLACK+DECKER, and the Hoover Linx were all about average in terms of weights, while the AirRam and the Rocket was a bit on the heavy side, as shown in the next chart.
Next, the Shark Navigator Freestyle earned a 5 out of 10 for its performance — about average in terms of convenience. This cordless model lasted for just shy of 14 minutes in its highest powered cleaning mode — slightly above average. It's a freestanding model that weighs just over 7 lbs, but lacks any attachments or transformations to clean surfaces other than floors. This simple stick vacuum isn't the most convenient to use, but at least it isn't frustrating.
Rounding out the back of the pack, theDirt Devil Simpli-Stik and the VonHaus earned a 4 out of 10 for their slightly sub-par performance. Both of these models are corded, with a somewhat shorter reach than the Shark Rocket, measuring in at 16' and 20' respectively. These model are both free-standing, but are quite delicate — prone to tipping or falling over.
This duo does earn a few points for being on the lighter side, but fall a little short when it comes to cleaning non-floor surfaces, with the Dirt Devil being noticeably more deficient than the VonHaus.
Hard Surface Cleaning
Moving on to the first of our cleaning metrics, the performance of each vacuum at cleaning hard floors accounts for 30% of the total score for each product. We used rice, flour, cereal, and oats, as well as pet hair to evaluate the performance of each model, comparing the appearance of the floor before and after, as well as the actual percentage of debris collected to determine the final score in this metric. You can see which vacuums excelled at keeping your hard floors spotless below.
The Dyson V10, the Shark IONFlex, and the Shark Rocket DuoClean all took home the top score in this metric, earning a 9 out of 10 for their phenomenal cleaning performance. All of these vacuums only took a single pass to clean up all of the rice using their bare floor mode and were by far the best and the easiest to use of all the stick vacuums to clean up the rice.
This stellar performance continued in our flour test, with all three of these vacuums cleaning up the majority of the flour with a single pass and then taking an additional pass to get any residual flour that had fallen into the cracks between the boards of the laminate floor.
This trio continued their dominance was also the best of the bunch at cleaning up oatmeal and cereal, only taking a single pass to perform an admirable cleaning job. Finally, the V10, the Rocket, and the IONFlex finished out their sweep of this metric by tying for the top score in our pet hair collection test, along with a handful of other models.
Next, the Dyson V8 Absolute, theShark Navigator Freestyle, and the Dibea all earned a 7 out of 10 for their solid performance at cleaning hard flooring. The Navigator and the Dibea outperformed the V8 at collecting rice, collecting almost everything in a single pass, while the V8 did well, but inadvertently flung some of the rice grains across the room. However, the Dyson V8 did very well at cleaning flour, almost matching the performance of the Shark Rocket. The Dibea did very well, almost matching the performance of the Dyson V8, but left a tiny bit more flour behind. The Navigator struggled a little, taking 2-4 passes to get the floor suitably clean.
Moving on to the cereal test, the V8 once again maintaining a slight edge on the Navigator. The Dibea performed poorly at collecting Cheerios, pushing them around instead of sucking them up into its collection bin. All three of these vacuums performed similarly when tasked with cleaning up oatmeal, delivering a good performance.
The V8 and the Navigator finished out this test with a great performance in our pet hair pickup test, tying with the Shark Rocket. The Dibea also did well, delivering a second-tier performance right behind those top products.
Following this trio of top performers, the Deik, VonHaus, and the AirRam merited a 6 out of 10 for their solid performance at cleaning hard floors.
The Deik did an absolutely fantastic job of cleaning up flour, but fell a little short at collecting Cheerios, tending to push them around rather than collecting them.
It did a good job at collecting pet hair and rice, but struggled a little at collecting oatmeal, leaving a decent amount of residual debris behind.
The VonHaus did exceptionally well at cleaning up rice — practically on par with the Shark Rocket — but faltered at collecting flour. The VonHaus delivered a terrible performance, taking over 20 passes and still leaving plenty of residual flour.
The VonHaus did an alright job at collecting cereal and oats, though it would occasionally pile up the debris, rather than collecting it. Finally, it did quite well at collecting pet hair, matching the performance of the top scorers, like the Shark Rocket or Dyson V8.
The AirRam did the exact opposite, doing a great job at collecting the flour but tending to fling rice and oats around, rather than collecting them.
It did do well at collecting Cheerios and pet hair, leaving barely any behind.
Next, the BLACK+DECKER, Dirt Devil, Dyson V6, and the Hoover Linx all scored a 5 out of 10 for their overall average performance at cleaning up hard floors. The Dirt Devil did the best of this group of four at collecting rice, getting the vast majority in a single pass.
However, this model can leak rice when its collection bin is filled completely. The BLACK+DECKER did a mediocre job, requiring you to make the decision between missing debris with the brush off or flinging it around with the brush on. Both the Hoover Linx and the V6 did a relatively subpar job, taking multiple passes to clean the area satisfactorily.
The performance of these 4 vacuums changed dramatically when it came to flour, with the Dyson V6 performing the best of this group — even tying for the top score overall with the Dyson V8 and the Shark Rocket. The V6 got all of the flour in two passes, even collecting flour from the cracks between boards.
The BLACK+DECKER and Linx did an acceptable job at collecting flour, taking about 4 passes to clean the floor and leaving plenty of residual flour in the cracks between boards. The Dirt Devil delivered an abysmal performance, taking over 20 passes and still leaving behind more flour than its counterparts.
Moving on to our Cheerios and oat collection challenges, the BLACk+DECKER, Dirt Devil, and Hoover Linx exhibited a relatively unimpressive performance, with this trio of vacuums doing a mediocre job at collecting debris. The BLACK+DECKER did do slightly better than the other two at collecting rice, but evened it out by doing slightly worse at picking up oats. The V6 gave a substandard showing in both of these tests, clogging up when tasked with collecting Cheerios and repeatedly piling up the oats. The Dirt Devil and V6 did do very well at collecting pet hair, ending up in the top-tier of performers, while the Hoover was average, and the BLACK+DECKER performed relatively poorly.
Rounding out the back of the pack, the Eufy HomeVac earned a 4 out of 10 for its somewhat substandard performance. The Eufy did alright at collecting rice, but it created a miniature catastrophe by flinging rice all over the place, practically creating a larger mess than we started with.
The Eufy actually did decently well at collecting flour, but failed at collecting Cheerios, barely collecting any. It rebounded slightly with pet hair, though it tended to have lots of hair collect in the brush.
Finally, it did about average at collecting oats, only flinging a few to the side — much, much less than the rice test.
Ease of Use
Our Ease of Use metric accounted for 20% of the total score, with a wide range of scores between each product. The scores for this metric are based on the different cleaning power levels available, how well each vacuum could clean under furniture and close into edges, as well as their noise levels and maneuverability.
Tying for the top score of 8 out of 10, the Shark IONFlex, Shark Rocket, Dyson V6, V8, and V10 topped the rest of the pack in terms of this metric. All of these models have both a low and high power cleaning mode, with the IONFlex and the Rocket having the added benefit of slowing down the speed of the rotating brush for hard floor types. Rather than having a different mode for hard floors, the V8 and the V10 actually have a different brush head for hard floor.
The Dyson V10, Shark Rocket, IONFlex, and the V6 all continued their exceptional performance into our edging test, with the V10, the Rocket and the IONFlex maintaining a slight edge on the V6, collecting all of the rice along the edge in a single pass. The V10 did leave a little bit of rice in the corners, doing much better at getting it head on or along the walls.
The V8 did slightly worse than the V6, leaving behind a slightly larger amount of rice. The V8, V6, Rocket, and IONFlex all did an excellent job in our test to simulate cleaning under furniture, reaching the complete distance of about 37" under our "sofa".
The V10 has a slightly reduced reach, having a reach about 4" shorter than the top vacuums.
All of these top-tier vacuums are nimble and agile, with the swivel steering making handling a breeze. However, the IONFlex and the V8 had the slight edge on the rest of this group when it came to noise levels, as shown in the chart below.
The V10 and the V6 are definitely on the louder side, especially when run at their maximum power levels.
Following this group of top performers, the Bissell AirRam earned a 7 out of 10 for its efforts. This model is relatively quiet and has swivel steering, though it isn't quite as nimble as the Sharks or Dyson V8.
This vacuum did reach completely under our simulated sofa and only left a little debris when cleaning in tight corners. It does lack different cleaning modes, so the AirRam lost a few points there.
Next, the DEIK, Dibea, BLACK+DECKER, and the Eufy HomeVac all earned a 6 out of 10 for their above average performance in our Ease of Use metric. The Eufy, Dibea, and the BLACK+DECKER both have a high and low power cleaning mode, but the BLACK+DECKER also has the additional option to turn off the rotating brush — a rarity for these products. The Deik only has a single cleaning mode and no option to adjust the brush speed.
However, the BLACK+DECKER did somewhat poorly in our edge cleaning test, leaving a noticeable strip of rice behind and requiring the use of a special attachment. The Eufy delivered a markedly better performance, matching the V8.
The Deik and Dibea are about average at cleaning edges, failing to perform as well as the Eufy, but outperforming the BLACK+DECKER.
The BLACK+DECKER and the Eufy swapped again when it came to cleaning under furniture, with the Eufy only reaching a measly 9.75" under our test sofa, just over half of the 18" reach of the BLACK+DECKER.
The Deik did much better, reaching further than both and matching the 37" of the top models.
The Dibea is right on its heels, reaching only about 3" less than the Deik.
This quartet all have swivel steering, though it is much more limited on the Eufy. While the Dibea has more swivel range than the Eufy, it is much harder to maneuver, tending to oversteer constantly. This made the Dibea much more frustrating to use around obstacles, hurting its score.
The Dibea is the quietest of this group, followed by the Eufy and the BLACK+DECKER. The Deik is definitely on the loud side, being one of the noisiest vacuums that we have tested.
Next, the Shark Navigator Freestyle earned a 5 out of 10 for its wholly unremarkable performance in terms of Ease of Use. This model has both a low and high power cleaning mode, as well as the option to slow down the rotating brush, though you can't stop it completely. This model did decent at cleaning in close to the edges, but took a few passes to clean as well as some of the others. This model did somewhat poorly in our furniture test, only reaching about 11" under the simulated sofa, less than a third of the top performers.
The Freestyle was in the middle of the pack in terms of noise and does have some swivel steering, though it was quite limited.
Finishing out the back of the group for this test, the Dirt Devil, Hoover Linx, and the VonHaus all scored 4 out of 10 for their somewhat below average performances. None of these three models have varying power levels for cleaning, though the Hoover Linx does have the option to turn off the rotating brush. However, it was the VonHaus that did the best of this group when it came to our edge cleaning test, performing on par with the Shark Navigator.
Both the Hoover and the Dirt Devil did a relatively poor job at cleaning in close to an edge, with the Dirt Devil doing the worst of the entire group, leaving behind a large strip of rice.
None of these three vacuums did very well when it came to reaching under furniture, with the Dirt Devil slightly redeeming itself, reaching about 5" further than the VonHaus or the Hoover.
Neither the VonHaus nor the Dirt Devil has swivel steering, so handling was a little limited, while the swivel steering on the Hoover was so bad that it might as well not have even been there in the first place. There were wildly varying noise levels between these vacuums, with the Dirt Devil being one of the quietest models of the group, the Hoover being average, and the VonHaus being loud enough to be mistaken with an upright vacuum.
Accounting for the remaining 15% of the total score for each vacuum, our final metric is composed of all of our carpet cleaning tests. We again used rice, cereal, oats, flour, and pet hair as our sample debris, ranking each vacuum on how many passes it took to clean up the messes, as well as how much residual debris had been left behind. For these tests, we tested on both a flat, low-pile carpet and a fluffier, medium-pile carpet.
The Dyson V10 and the V8 both tied for the overall top score of the group when it came to cleaning carpets, earning an 8 out of 10 for their excellent performances. The V10 and the V8 both did very well when it came to our rice collection challenge, collecting all of the debris from the flat carpet with only two passes. These both did even better on the fluffy carpet, with the cleanup vacuum collecting hardly any rice after the V8 had cleaned and even less after the V10.
The V10 and the V8 both did the best of the group at collecting flour, getting the bulk of the flour in a single pass.
The V8 continued its stellar performance in the cereal test, breaking the trend of clogging up from Cheerios, like many other Dyson models that we have tested have done, even besting the V10.
While we felt that the V10 had far superior suction to the V8, there isn't much space for larger debris items between the head and the floor, leading it to push the Cheerios around for a while before it collects them.
However, the gap on the V10 was more than enough to easily collect pet hair and oats, with both the V10 and the V8 delivering top-notch performances in our final carpet cleaning assessments.
The Shark Rocket, Shark IONFlex, and the Deik all tied for the second-highest score of 7 out of 10 in this metric with their solid performance. The Rocket did a fantastic job of cleaning up the rice from low-pile carpet, only taking two passes to get everything collected. It did even better on the medium-pile carpet, only tossing a few grains of rice to the side and matching the performance of an upright vacuum. However, its performance definitely dropped when it came to collecting flour, leaving plenty of residual dust. Due to the poor performance of all the vacuums across the board, we only attempted this test on the flat carpet, not on the fluffy carpet.
The Rocket resumed its excellent performance in our cereal test, doing the best of the entire group on both flat and fluffy carpet. It also did well at collecting oats — just not quite as well as the pair of Dyson models and the Eufy.
The IONFlex matched the performance of the Rocket when it came to collecting rice, similarly taking two passes to collect all of the debris. It also did exceptionally well at collecting flour and oats.
It finished out this metric with a strong performance in the final two tests — pet hair and cereal — again almost matching the performance of the Rocket at pet hair and matching it at collecting Cheerios.
The Deik held its own in this metric, doing a fantastic job — better than the IONFlex — at collecting pet hair and a good job at sucking up Cheerios.
It also did very well at collecting oats and flour, though it performed slightly worse than the IONFlex at collecting rice.
Following the stellar performance of the top models, the Dyson V6, Shark Navigator Freestyle, and Eufy HomeVac all earned a 6 out of 10. These models all did a decent job at collecting rice from flat carpet, though the Eufy took an additional two passes to get the floor as clean. However, the Eufy did an excellent job of cleaning the rice from the fluffier carpet — on par with the V8. The Navigator Freestyle did a little better than the V6, but couldn't match the Eufy.
Moving on to the flour test, the Dyson V6 delivered an excellent performance, almost matching that of the V8 and outperforming the Shark Rocket.
The Eufy and the Navigator Freestyle both delivered a somewhat subpar performance, leaving behind plenty of residual flour. However, this flipped when it came to collecting Cheerios, with the Eufy and the Navigator delivering an average performance, where the V6 failed completely, becoming clogged with Cheerios. However, it did redeem itself in the final two tests, oatmeal and pet hair collection, doing a decent job. The Eufy and Navigator performed similarly in these tests, scoring above average.
Next, the Hoover Linx, BLACK+DECKER, Bissel AirRam, and the VonHaus all earned a 5 out of 10 for their exceptionally average performance when it came to cleaning carpets. Three of these models — the Hoover, VonHaus, and the BLACK+DECKER — did quite well at collecting rice, doing a decent job on both low-pile and medium-pile carpets. The AirRam flung rice around a bit on the flat carpet, but did an excellent job on the fluffier, medium-pile carpet. In particular, the VonHaus distinguished itself on the medium-pile carpet, almost matching the performance of the Dyson V8.
None of these models really excelled at cleaning flour from carpet, with the Hoover and the AirRam performing slightly below average, the VonHaus slightly above, and the BLACK+DECKER right in the middle. However, the Hoover Linx and the Bissel AirRam did excel in our cereal collection test, leaving only a few residual Cheerios behind on flat carpet and requiring minimal effort to collect them from the fluffy carpet.
The VonHaus did a decent job across the board, where the BLACK+DECKER did well on the flat carpet but fell a little flat on the fluffy carpet, continually piling them up rather than collecting them.
All of the vacuums, except the AirRam, did a relatively subpar job at collecting oats. The BLACK+DECKER finished out the test with a solid performance in our pet hair collection test, the Hoover did about average, and the VonHaus and the Bissell AirRam left much to be desired.
The Dibea placed next, meriting a 4 out of 10 for its meager carpet cleaning efforts. This vacuum delivered a substandard showing when it came to collecting rice, oats, and flour from both flat and fluffier carpets.
It did a little better with Cheerios, but still left the bulk of them behind, and delivered a particularly poor showing when tasked with collecting pet hair.
Rounding out the back of the group, the Dirt Devil did an all-around poor job at cleaning carpets. It did alright at collecting cereal, but poor at everything else.
Hopefully, this review has helped alleviate some of the difficulty in selecting the perfect stick vacuum for your needs. If you want some more information on our testing plans and processes, you might want to take a read through our How We Test article, or if you want some more background information about why you would even want one of these products, our Buying Advice guide provides more information.
— David Wise and Austin Palmer
Still not sure? Take a look at our buying advice article for tips.