Dyson V10 Absolute
: 5.9 lbs. | Max Power Runtime
Amazing at cleaning soft floors
Excels on hard floors
Extremely easy to use
Earning the highest score we have ever seen, the Dyson V10 easily claimed an Editors' Choice Award to assume the mantle of Best Overall Stick Vacuum. This product handles all types of messes on both hard and soft floors with ease, offering some of the best performances that we have seen from these products when it comes to cleaning messes on carpet. This model is also exceptionally easy to use and is a very convenient way to keep your floors sparkling. If you want unparalleled cleaning ability from a stick vacuum, then the V10 is the obvious choice.
However, this is also one of the most expensive products that we have seen in this category. This exceptionally high price makes the V10 well out of most people's budget for supplemental cleaning appliance. Regardless of that, it is the best of the best — if you can afford it.
Read Full Review: Dyson V10 Absolute
Another Great Option
: 8.9 lbs. | Max Power Runtime
Amazing at cleaning hard surfaces
Extremely easy to use
Our previous top pick before being bested by the V10, the IONFlex is an excellent, all-around stick vacuum that is a close second to the V10 in terms of performance, but retails for less than half the price. This cordless vacuum performed extremely well in our hard floor cleaning tests. This model fold for easy storage and has swappable batteries, so your runtime is only limited by the number of additional batteries that you have. The IONFlex includes a handful of attachments and has the versatility to clean practically anywhere in your home and is highly maneuverable and easy to operate.
However, while this vacuum is much less expensive than the V10, it is still quite pricey. This can be exceptionally more than most people may be willing to spend for one of these products, as for many, a stick vacuum is supplemental cleaning tool to be paired with a full-size vacuum, rather than their sole cleaning method. It's also a little on the heavy side for a cordless vacuum, but it is still an excellent product overall, especially if you want the best but can't afford the V10.
Read Full Review: Shark IONFlex
Shark Rocket DuoClean
: 10.0 lbs. | Max Power Runtime
: N/A (Corded)
Fantastic at cleaning hard surfaces
Easy to use
Good at cleaning carpet
Earning the highest score of the overall group and claiming the title of Best Overall Stick Vacuum, the Shark Rocket DuoClean is the best of the best and our top recommendation for most people. This premium corded stick vacuum is extraordinarily easy to use, with the cleaning power to rival plenty of upright vacuums. It does an exceptional job of collecting debris and cleaning up messes from hard floors and a great one on carpet. It's agile and easy to maneuver, with tons of versatility to clean all of the hard to reach places around your home.
Our only slight issue with this product is that it is a little on the heavy side. Additionally, while the corded component of this vacuum means you have unlimited runtime while cleaning, it is undeniably much more cumbersome than the cordless models. However, we would readily recommend this product as one of our favorites. It does a solid job of cleaning your home and retails for much less than the top-tier products.
Read Full Review: Shark Rocket DuoClean
Best Bang for the Buck
: 4.9 lbs. | Max Power Runtime
Great battery life
Good at cleaning carpets
Not as easy to use as others
Searching for a cordless stick vacuum and don't want to spend hundreds of dollars? The Deik won't disappoint, performing quite well across the board and earning the Best Buy award for being a great value. This Dyson clone does a good job of keeping carpets and hard floors clean and is one of the most convenient vacuums to use to clean up small messes quickly, having an impressive battery life considering its weight and cost,
It doesn't quite match the cleaning performance of the top models and is a little more difficult to use. It also isn't quite as convenient, but, on the whole, it delivers a more than acceptable performance making it the best bet for those shopping on a budget and don't want to spend a ton.
Read Full Review: Deik ZB1516
Good for a Tight Budget
VonHaus 600W 2-in-1
: 4.5 lbs. | Max Power Runtime
: N/A (Corded)
Decent for cleaning hard surfaces
Average for cleaning soft floors
Not terribly convenient
The VonHaus 600W 2-in-1 definitely isn't the best stick vacuum that we looked at, but it does have its place. This model would be a solid choice for someone shopping on a tight budget and is primarily cleaning a smaller home with hard floors. This model can also transform into a handheld vacuum to get all of those hard to reach places.
Unfortunately, this product simply lacks the raw cleaning power that the top models have. Despite this mediocre cleaning performance, this model is still a solid choice if you are shopping on the tightest of tight budgets.
Read Full Review: VonHaus 600W 2-in-1
Compare Top Products
Displaying 13 Products
Some of the top models available on the market today.
Analysis and Test Results
To see which stick vacuum came out on top of the pack and swept the competition under the rug, we devised a challenging series of tests to evaluate the performance of these products side-by-side. Totaling over 20, these tests were divided among four weighted rating metrics: Convenience, Hard Surface Cleaning, Ease of Use, and Carpet Cleaning. The performance in these metrics resulted in a final score ranging from 0-100 for each vacuum, with the sections below giving more detail about how each vacuum did and how it stacks up against the competition.
Related: Buying Advice for Stick Vacuums
As you can see from the above chart, the top vacuums come at a bit of a premium price, notably the Dyson V10 and the Dyson V8. The Shark Rocket gives you the best bang for the buck of the top-tier vacuums, but it is a corded model — a dealbreaker for some people. The Diek is the overall best value, retailing at a fraction of the cost of the V10 or the Shark IONFlex and performing only marginally worse in our tests. The PowerPlush is another solid value pick, but only if you primarily are cleaning hard surfaces.
The Dyson V8 in handheld mode.
While you may be a bit surprised that the cleaning prowess of these products isn't first, we found convenience to be king for these products. The main advantage of these products over a traditional canister or upright vacuum is their substantially superior convenience factor and ease of use — hence the higher weight on this metric. This metric, accounting for a whopping 35% of the overall score for each product — encompassed tests where we compared and scored how well each vacuum cleaned non-floor areas of your home, the battery life of the cordless models and the reach of the corded ones, each product's weight, and its storage method.
Tying for the top score of the entire group in this metric, the Dibea C17 and the Eureka PowerPlush both earned an 8 out of 10. The Dibea and the PowerPlush both have exceptionally long runtimes, lasting for almost 27 minutes and 19 minutes, respectively.
Both of these products are also quite good at cleaning non-floor areas of your home. They both have a myriad of different attachments, such as crevice or brush tools, which are very easy to attach and detach to the main unit using a push-button locking system.
The PowerPlush is easy to swap to handheld mode.
The Dibea is slightly lighter than the Eureka PowerPlush, weighing about 1.8 lbs. less, and both of these vacuums can't stand up on their own and need to be stored in their wall mounts.
This was the quietest model we tested.
Following those top two vacuums, the Dyson V10 Absolute, the Dyson V8 Absolute, Shark IONFlex, and the Deik, all earned a 7 out of 10 when it came to convenience. These vacuums are all cordless, with the duo of Dyson models and the Deik having a convenient wall mounted storage system to keep them out of the way when not in use. The Shark IONFlex folds in half for convenient, standing storage in an out of the way location.
The IONFlex folds for storage or to help get under those hard to reach places.
However, none of the Dyson stick vacuums have a particularly impressive battery life — at least on maximum power. Both of them lasted less than 10 minutes in our test — quite a bit less than some of the other cordless models that we looked out.
However, the runtime can be significantly extended by running on a lower power cleaning mode, which we found to be more than enough to clean up most messes, especially in the case of the V10. In fact, we actually had a hard time pushing the V10 on the low-pile carpet when it was in its maximum power mode, as the suction is so strong.
This duo of products from Dyson are all about average in terms of weight, both weighing between 4-6 lbs.
The Deik weighs about the same, but had a much more impressive battery life, lasting slightly over double the amount of time when running on its maximum power setting.
The IONFlex is a little on the heavier side, weighing in closer to 9 lbs, but has a battery life of almost 12 minutes. Both the IONFlex and the Deik are quite effective at cleaning non-floor areas of your home as well, though not quite as proficient as the Dyson V10 or V8 with their plethora of attachments.
The Deik in handheld mode with the edging attachment.
Next, the quartet of the BLACK+DECKER, Hoover Linx, BISSELL AirRam, and the Shark Rocket DuoClean all earned a 6 out of 10 in this metric. The Hoover, BISSELL, and BLACK+DECKER are all cordless, while the Shark Rocket is corded. The AirRam actually had the longest battery life of the entire group, lasting for 35 minutes at full power, with the Hoover lasting for just over 21 minutes, and the BLACK+DECKER calling it quits at just over 16 minutes. The Shark Rocket has the longest reach of the group of cordless models, shown in the following chart.
However, the Shark Rocket is the best of this bunch at cleaning non-floor surfaces — on par with the Dyson V10. The Rocket includes a ton of different attachments that are very easy to swap out.
The Shark Rocket in handheld mode.
The BLACK+DECKER can transform into a handheld vacuum, while the Hoover Linx, AirRam is restricted to upright mode only. However, the Hoover is, but doesn't have a wall mount. The BLACK+DECKER and the AirRam are stable enough to be freestanding, while the Rocket is primarily meant to be wall mounted — though you can detach the top and hang it towards the base, providing enough support for this model to stand without support.
The BLACK+DECKER and the Hoover Linx were both about average in terms of weights, while the AirRam and the Rocket are a bit on the heavy side, as shown in the next chart.
Next, the Shark Navigator Freestyle earned a 5 out of 10 for its performance — about average in terms of convenience. This cordless model lasted for just shy of 14 minutes in its highest powered cleaning mode — slightly above average. It's a freestanding model that weighs just over 7 lbs, but lacks any attachments or transformations to clean surfaces other than floors. This simple stick vacuum isn't the most convenient to use, but at least it isn't frustrating.
Rounding out the back of the pack, theDirt Devil Simpli-Stik and the VonHaus earned a 4 out of 10 for their slightly sub-par performance. Both of these models are corded, with a somewhat shorter reach than the Shark Rocket, measuring in at 16' and 20' respectively. These model are both free-standing, but are quite delicate — prone to tipping or falling over.
The VonHaus in handheld mode.
This duo does earn a few points for being on the lighter side, but fall a little short when it comes to cleaning non-floor surfaces, with the Dirt Devil being noticeably more deficient than the VonHaus.
The Rocket making short work of oats on the hardwood floor.
Hard Surface Cleaning
Moving on to the first of our cleaning metrics, the performance of each vacuum at cleaning hard floors accounts for 30% of the total score for each product. We used rice, flour, cereal, and oats, as well as pet hair to evaluate the performance of each model, comparing the appearance of the floor before and after, as well as the actual percentage of debris collected to determine the final score in this metric. You can see which vacuums excelled at keeping your hard floors spotless below.
The Dyson V10, the Shark IONFlex, and the Shark Rocket DuoClean all took home the top score in this metric, earning a 9 out of 10 for their phenomenal cleaning performance. All of these vacuums only took a single pass to clean up all of the rice using their bare floor mode and were by far the best and the easiest to use of all the stick vacuums to clean up the rice.
The IONFlex easily picked up the oats in one pass.
This stellar performance continued in our flour test, with all three of these vacuums cleaning up the majority of the flour with a single pass and then taking an additional pass to get any residual flour that had fallen into the cracks between the boards of the laminate floor.
The Rocket even extracted flour from the cracks between boards.
This trio continued their dominance was also the best of the bunch at cleaning up oatmeal and cereal, only taking a single pass to perform an admirable cleaning job. Finally, the V10, the Rocket, and the IONFlex finished out their sweep of this metric by tying for the top score in our pet hair collection test, along with a handful of other models.
The Dyson V8 Absolute and the Eureka PowerPlush both came next, earning an 8 out of 10 for their hard floor cleaning abilities. Both of these do very at cleaning up flour, taking about two passes to clean up the bulk of the flour. Both of these vacuums would even clean up flour from the cracks in between the boards, though the Eureka would only do this when you vacuumed parallel to the cracks, while the Dyson V8 would clear regardless if you vacuumed parallel or perpendicular.
The V8 delivered an excellent performance in this test.
The PowerPlush and the V8 both delivered perfect performance in our cereal pet hair, collecting all of the mess we laid out without any issues all. The pair also did very well in our oat test, getting the almost all of the oats in a single pass, though there was a tiny portion of oats flung to the side by both vacuums.
The Dyson V8 collected oats with ease.
Unfortunately, the performance of these vacuums dropped in our rice test, doing a mediocre job of cleaning up. The V8 and the PowerPlush both cleaned up a decent amount of the rice, but they both flung a non-trivial amount of rice out of the path of the vacuum.
Next, the Shark Navigator Freestyle and the Dibea both earned a 7 out of 10 for their solid performance at cleaning hard flooring. The Navigator and the Dibea did very well at collecting rice, sucking up almost everything in a single pass. The Dibea did very well, almost matching the performance of the Dyson V8, but left a tiny bit more flour behind. The Navigator struggled a little, taking 2-4 passes to get the floor suitably clean.
The Navigator Freestyle took a few more passes to clean the flour and couldn't quite get it all out of the cracks.
Moving on to the cereal test, the Navigator has an edge on the Dibea, which performed poorly at collecting Cheerios, pushing them around instead of sucking them up into its collection bin. Both of these vacuums performed similarly when tasked with cleaning up oatmeal, delivering a good performance.
The Dibea picked up debris on hard surfaces well.
finished out this test with a great performance in our pet hair pickup test, tying with the Shark Rocket
. The Dibea
also did well, delivering a second-tier performance right behind the top products.
The Deik, VonHaus, and the AirRam all came next, each meriting a 6 out of 10 for their solid performance at cleaning hard floors.
The Deik did an absolutely fantastic job of cleaning up flour, but fell a little short at collecting Cheerios, tending to push them around rather than collecting them.
The Diek's low ground clearance cause it to plow the Cheerios rather than suck them up.
It did a good job at collecting pet hair and rice, but struggled a little at collecting oatmeal, leaving a decent amount of residual debris behind.
The VonHaus did exceptionally well at cleaning up rice — practically on par with the Shark Rocket — but faltered at collecting flour. The VonHaus delivered a terrible performance, taking over 20 passes and still leaving plenty of residual flour.
The VonHaus severely struggled at picking up flour.
The VonHaus did an alright job at collecting cereal and oats, though it would occasionally pile up the debris, rather than collecting it. Finally, it did quite well at collecting pet hair, matching the performance of the top scorers, like the Shark Rocket or Dyson V10.
The AirRam did the exact opposite, doing a great job at collecting the flour but tending to fling rice and oats around, rather than collecting them.
The AirRam excelled at cleaning flour from hard floors.
It did do well at collecting Cheerios and pet hair, leaving barely any behind.
Next, the BLACK+DECKER, Dirt Devil, and the Hoover Linx all scored a 5 out of 10 for their overall average performance at cleaning up hard floors. The Dirt Devil did the best of this group of four at collecting rice, getting the vast majority in a single pass.
However, this model can leak rice when its collection bin is filled completely. The BLACK+DECKER did a mediocre job, requiring you to make the decision between missing debris with the brush off or flinging it around with the brush on. The Hoover Linx did a relatively subpar job, taking multiple passes to clean the area satisfactorily.
The performance of these 3 vacuums changed dramatically when it came to flour. The BLACK+DECKER and Linx did an acceptable job at collecting flour, taking about 4 passes to clean the floor and leaving plenty of residual flour in the cracks between boards. The Dirt Devil delivered an abysmal performance, taking over 20 passes and still leaving behind more flour than its counterparts.
The Dirt Devil left behind plenty of residual flour.
Moving on to our Cheerios and oat collection challenges, the BLACk+DECKER, Dirt Devil, and Hoover Linx exhibited a relatively unimpressive performance, with this trio of vacuums doing a mediocre job at collecting debris. The BLACK+DECKER did do slightly better than the other two at collecting rice, but evened it out by doing slightly worse at picking up oats. The Dirt Devil did do very well at collecting pet hair, ending up in the top-tier of performers, while the Hoover was average, and the BLACK+DECKER performed relatively poorly.
Finally, it did about average at collecting oats, only flinging a few to the side — much, much less than the rice test.
The Dyson V8 was one of the easiest models to use.
Ease of Use
Our Ease of Use metric accounted for 20% of the total score, with a wide range of scores between each product. The scores for this metric are based on the different cleaning power levels available, how well each vacuum could clean under furniture and close into edges, as well as their noise levels and maneuverability.
Tying for the top score of 8 out of 10, the Shark IONFlex, Shark Rocket, Dyson V8, and V10 topped the rest of the pack in terms of this metric. All of these models have both a low and high power cleaning mode, with the IONFlex and the Rocket having the added benefit of slowing down the speed of the rotating brush for hard floor types. Rather than having a different mode for hard floors, the V8 and the V10 actually have a different brush head for hard floor.
The V10 does an excellent job of cleaning up messes from hard floors using the dedicated hard floor brush.
The Dyson V10, Shark Rocket, and the IONFlex, all continued their exceptional performance into our edging test, with the Rocket and the IONFlex maintaining a slight edge on the V10, as it left a little bit in the corner. The V10 is better at picking up debris either head-on into a wall or along the edge.
The Rocket cleans right into the tightest of corners and along edges.
The V8, Rocket, and IONFlex all did an excellent job in our test to simulate cleaning under furniture, reaching the complete distance of about 37" under our "sofa".
The Dyson V8 easily cleans under most furniture.
The V10 has a slightly reduced reach, having a reach about 4" shorter than the top vacuums.
The V10 couldn't quite reach the entire length of our simulated sofa, coming up about 4" shy.
All of these top-tier vacuums are nimble and agile, with the swivel steering making handling a breeze. However, the IONFlex and the V8 had the slight edge on the rest of this group when it came to noise levels, as shown in the chart below.
The V10 is definitely on the louder side, especially when run at its maximum power levels.
Following this group of top performers, the BISSELL AirRam earned a 7 out of 10 for its efforts. This model is relatively quiet and has swivel steering, though it isn't quite as nimble as the Sharks or Dyson V8.
The swivel steering on this product is quite good, but it is definitely inferior to the Shark Rocket or Dyson V8.
This vacuum did reach completely under our simulated sofa and only left a little debris when cleaning in tight corners. It does lack different cleaning modes, so the AirRam lost a few points there.
Next, the Eureka PowerPlush, the DEIK, the Dibea, and the BLACK+DECKER, all earned a 6 out of 10 for their above average performance in our Ease of Use metric. The Dibea and the BLACK+DECKER both have a high and low power cleaning mode, but the BLACK+DECKER also has the additional option to turn off the rotating brush — a rarity for these products. The PowerPlush and the Deik only have a single cleaning mode and neither have an option to adjust the brush speed.
However, the BLACK+DECKER and the PowerPlush did somewhat poorly in our edge cleaning test, leaving a noticeable strip of rice behind and requiring the use of a special attachment.
The PowerPlush wasn't very effective at cleaning up the edges.
The Deik and Dibea are about average at cleaning edges, doing a bit better than the BLACK+DECKER and significantly better than the PowerPlush.
The Deik does better at cleaning head on into a wall.
The BLACK+DECKER didn't do amazing when it came to reaching under our sofa test, only reaching about 18".
The BLACK+DECKER reached about half the distance of the top models when cleaning under our simulated sofa.
The Deik and the PowerPlush did much better, reaching almost twice that of the BLACK+DECKER and matching the 37"+ of the top performers.
The Deik has an excellent reach.
The Dibea reached almost as far, reaching only about 3" less than the Deik and the PowerPlush.
These four vacuums all have swivel steering, though they aren't as limited like the Hoover. While the Dibea has a good swivel range, it is much harder to maneuver, tending to oversteer constantly. This made the Dibea much more frustrating to use around obstacles, hurting its score.
The steering on the Dibea felt like driving on ice.
The Dibea is the quietest of this group, followed by the Eureka and then the BLACK+DECKER. The Deik is definitely on the loud side, being one of the noisiest vacuums that we have tested.
Next, the Shark Navigator Freestyle earned a 5 out of 10 for its wholly unremarkable performance in terms of Ease of Use. This model has both a low and high power cleaning mode, as well as the option to slow down the rotating brush, though you can't stop it completely. This model did decent at cleaning in close to the edges, but took a few passes to clean as well as some of the others. This model did somewhat poorly in our furniture test, only reaching about 11" under the simulated sofa, less than a third of the top performers.
The Shark Navigator Freestyle didn't reach very far under furniture at all.
The Freestyle was in the middle of the pack in terms of noise and does have some swivel steering, though it was quite limited.
Finishing out the back of the group for this test, the Dirt Devil, Hoover Linx, and the VonHaus all scored 4 out of 10 for their somewhat below average performances. None of these three models have varying power levels for cleaning, though the Hoover Linx does have the option to turn off the rotating brush. However, it was the VonHaus that did the best of this group when it came to our edge cleaning test, performing on par with the Shark Navigator.
The VonHaus did an excellent job at cleaning along edges.
Both the Hoover and the Dirt Devil did a relatively poor job at cleaning in close to an edge, with the Dirt Devil doing the worst of the entire group, leaving behind a large strip of rice.
The Dirt Devil left behind plenty of residual rice.
None of these three vacuums did very well when it came to reaching under furniture, with the Dirt Devil slightly redeeming itself, reaching about 5" further than the VonHaus or the Hoover.
The Hoover had an excessively short reach.
Neither the VonHaus nor the Dirt Devil has swivel steering, so handling was a little limited, while the swivel steering on the Hoover was so bad that it might as well not have even been there in the first place. There were wildly varying noise levels between these vacuums, with the Dirt Devil being one of the quietest models of the group, the Hoover being average, and the VonHaus being loud enough to be mistaken with an upright vacuum.
The Dyson V8 is one of the best when it comes to cleaning carpets.
Accounting for the remaining 15% of the total score for each vacuum, our final metric is composed of all of our carpet cleaning tests. We again used rice, cereal, oats, flour, and pet hair as our sample debris, ranking each vacuum on how many passes it took to clean up the messes, as well as how much residual debris had been left behind. For these tests, we tested on both a flat, low-pile carpet and a fluffier, medium-pile carpet.
The Dyson V10 and the V8 both tied for the overall top score of the group when it came to cleaning carpets, earning an 8 out of 10 for their excellent performances. The V10 and the V8 both did very well when it came to our rice collection challenge, collecting all of the debris from the flat carpet with only two passes. These both did even better on the fluffy carpet, with the cleanup vacuum collecting hardly any rice after the V8 had cleaned and even less after the V10.
The V10 and the V8 main extractors, side-by-side.
The V10 and the V8 both did the best of the group at collecting flour, getting the bulk of the flour in a single pass.
The Dyson V8 did a great job at cleaning flour from the low-pile carpet.
The V8 continued its stellar performance in the cereal test, breaking the trend of clogging up from Cheerios, like many other Dyson models that we have tested have done, even outperforming the V10.
The Dyson V8 even collected Cheerios without becoming clogged, like other vacuums did.
While we felt that the V10 had far superior suction to the V8, there isn't much space for larger debris items between the head and the floor, leading it to push the Cheerios around for a while before it collects them.
However, the gap on the V10 was more than enough to easily collect pet hair and oats, with both the V10 and the V8 delivering top-notch performances in our final carpet cleaning assessments.
The Shark Rocket, Shark IONFlex, and the Deik all tied for the second-highest score of 7 out of 10 in this metric with their solid performance. The Rocket did a fantastic job of cleaning up the rice from low-pile carpet, only taking two passes to get everything collected. It did even better on the medium-pile carpet, only tossing a few grains of rice to the side and matching the performance of an upright vacuum. However, its performance definitely dropped when it came to collecting flour, leaving plenty of residual dust. Due to the poor performance of all the vacuums across the board, we only attempted this test on the flat carpet, not on the fluffy carpet.
The Shark Rocket also excels at keeping carpet clean.
The Rocket resumed its excellent performance in our cereal test, doing the best of the entire group on both flat and fluffy carpet. It also did well at collecting oats — just not quite as well as the pair of Dyson models.
The IONFlex matched the performance of the Rocket when it came to collecting rice, similarly taking two passes to collect all of the debris. It also did exceptionally well at collecting flour and oats.
The IONFlex did almost equally well at picking up oats on fluffy carpet as it did on short-pile carpet.
It finished out this metric with a strong performance in the final two tests — pet hair and cereal — again almost matching the performance of the Rocket at pet hair and matching it at collecting Cheerios.
The Deik held its own in this metric, doing a fantastic job — better than the IONFlex — at collecting pet hair and a good job at sucking up Cheerios.
The Deik had similar Cheerio pick up performance to the VonHaus. It would pile them up then use the extra friction it created to suck them in.
It also did very well at collecting oats and flour, though it performed slightly worse than the IONFlex at collecting rice.
Following the stellar performance of the top models, the Shark Navigator Freestyle earned a 6 out of 10. This model did a decent job at collecting rice from the flat carpet. The Navigator Freestyle delivered a somewhat subpar performance, leaving behind plenty of residual flour. However, this flipped when it came to collecting Cheerios. The Navigator delivering an average performance,
Next, the Hoover Linx, BLACK+DECKER, BISSELL AirRam, and the VonHaus all earned a 5 out of 10 for their exceptionally average performance when it came to cleaning carpets. Three of these models — the Hoover, VonHaus, and the BLACK+DECKER — did quite well at collecting rice, doing a decent job on both low-pile and medium-pile carpets. The AirRam flung rice around a bit on the flat carpet, but did an excellent job on the fluffier, medium-pile carpet. In particular, the VonHaus distinguished itself on the medium-pile carpet, almost matching the performance of the Dyson V8.
The VonHaus did a slightly above average job at cleaning rice.
None of these models really excelled at cleaning flour from carpet, with the Hoover and the AirRam performing slightly below average, the VonHaus slightly above, and the BLACK+DECKER right in the middle. However, the Hoover Linx and the Bissel AirRam did excel in our cereal collection test, leaving only a few residual Cheerios behind on flat carpet and requiring minimal effort to collect them from the fluffy carpet.
The VonHaus did a decent job across the board, where the BLACK+DECKER did well on the flat carpet but fell a little flat on the fluffy carpet, continually piling them up rather than collecting them.
All of the vacuums, except the AirRam, did a relatively subpar job at collecting oats. The BLACK+DECKER finished out the test with a solid performance in our pet hair collection test, the Hoover did about average, and the VonHaus and the BISSELL AirRam left much to be desired.
The Dibea and the Eureka PowerPlush both placed next, each meriting a 4 out of 10 for their lackluster carpet cleaning efforts. The Dibea delivered a substandard showing when it came to collecting rice, oats, and flour from both flat and fluffier carpets.
The Dibea barely scraped the surface with pet hair.
It did a little better with Cheerios, but still left the bulk of them behind, and delivered a particularly poor showing when tasked with collecting pet hair.
The PowerPlush did very well at getting the flour out of the low-pile carpet, doing better than the Deik but not as well as the top Dyson or Shark models. It also did well collecting the Cheerios from both types of carpets.
The PowerPlush performed surprisingly well at getting the flour off the surface of our short pile carpet.
However, it didn't do very well with pet hair, oatmeal, or rice. The Eureka is really hard to push across carpet, but it will clean well enough with enough passes. It tends to throw the rice and oats to the side on the flat carpet and won't really clean into the fibers at all on the fluffier carpet.
It didn't really pick up any pet hair at first, but would eventually get some after tons and tons of passes. However, this isn't really an efficient way to clean up pet hair, so would only really be suitable for a small area, like an area rug.
Rounding out the back of the group, the Dirt Devil earned a 3 out of 10 for its all-around poor job at cleaning carpets. It did a barely acceptable job at collecting cereal, but poor at everything else.
Hopefully, this review has helped alleviate some of the difficulty in selecting the perfect stick vacuum for your needs.