ASUS C202SA Review
Pros: Inexpensive, rubber reinforcements, spill resistant keyboard
Cons: Relatively poor screen, not great for multitasking
Compare to Similar Products
|Price||$230 List||$300 List||$500 List||$350 List||$230 List|
|Pros||Inexpensive, rubber reinforcements, spill resistant keyboard||Good performance, super portable||Fast web browsing, sensitive touchscreen, great keyboard and trackpad||Large screen, nice typing experience, large trackpad||Fast web browsing|
|Cons||Relatively poor screen, not great for multitasking||Cramped keyboard, small screen||No stylus||Heavy, no tablet mode||Keyboard feels flimsy, loud trackpad|
|Bottom Line||Good for bargain hunters that just need basic internet||Good if you want a tablet that offers a somewhat natural typing experience, but certainly not good as a full-time computer||Great, but not the best in its price range||Great for productivity and movie watching, but not for travelling||Great and inexpensive machine for simple tasks|
|Rating Categories||ASUS C202SA||ASUS Flip C101PA||ASUS Flip C302CA||Acer 15||Samsung 3|
|Interface And Features (20%)|
|Display Quality (20%)|
|Battery Life (20%)|
|Specs||ASUS C202SA||ASUS Flip C101PA||ASUS Flip C302CA||Acer 15||Samsung 3|
|Weight||2.65 lb||2 lb||2.65 lb||4.3 lb||2.54 lb|
|Dimensions||11.57" x 7.87" x 0.89"||10.4" x 7.2" x 0.6"||11.97" x 8.28" x 0.54"||14.88" x 10.08" x 0.75"||11.37" x 8.04" x 0.7"|
|RAM||4 GB||4 GB||4 GB||4 GB||4 GB|
|Storage||16 GB||16 GB||64 GB||32 GB||32 GB|
|Processor||Intel Celeron N3060 1.6 GHz||OP1||Intel Core m3||Intel Pentium N4200||Intel Celeron N3050 1.6 GHz|
|Screen Resolution||1366x768||1280 x 800||1920 x 1080||1920 x 1080||1366 x 768|
|Ports||HDMI, Micro SD, 2 x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm Aux||1 x USB 3.0, 2 x USB C, 3.5 mm Aux||Micro HDMI, Micro SD, 2 x USB 2.0, 3.5 mm Aux||2 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB C, 3.5 mm Aux||HDMI, Micro SD, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm Aux|
|Reported Battery Life (hours)||10||9||10||14||11|
|Measured Battery Life (hours)||4.8||7||5.5||7.5||4.5|
Our Analysis and Test Results
For those that want a barebones computer for simple tasks that can stand up to a little extra abuse, the ASUS C202SA isn't a bad choice. Its relatively poor display may disappoint some people, but if you don't mind your Netflix binging looking a bit like it's 1995 this is a decent machine.
The ASUS C202SA certainly is not a high powered machine, as you can see in the table above. However, it does gain some merit as a durable machine for travel. You can see exactly how it performed in all of our tests below.
There wasn't a single poor performer in our testing. That being said, the ASUS C202SA was at the bottom of the barrel in that capacity, about even with the other low-priced option we tested, the Samsung 3. This machine has the requisite 4GB of RAM that allows for lag-free web browsing. We were even able to stream video while browsing with 5-10 tabs open without any real lag. If you start to throw web apps into the mix you may start to see some jumpiness. For example, with an HD video streaming and 10 tabs open, we started editing a Google Sheet and noticed that moving cells around had a bit of a delay. It wasn't a terrible delay, but it was noticeable. If you're going to be doing some heavy multitasking you'll want to invest in one of the higher end models if you can, like the Samsung Pro.
Interface and Features
Here again the ASUS C202SA was at the bottom of the totem pole, along with its main competitor, the Samsung 3. The 11.6" size means the keyboard isn't quite full sized. It isn't ridiculously cramped, but if you're coming over from a standard sized keyboard it may take a minute to get used to. The keys themselves feel pretty nice, not quite as crisp as those of higher-end models, but a bit better than the more clunky keys of the Samsung 3. The trackpad is responsive but on the small side. This is one of the few newer Chromebooks, along with the Samsung 3, that does not have a touchscreen, so using Android apps is no fun. Bottom line, if you're just doing a little surfing and typing a few emails, this interface is fine. If you want to use Android apps or do some more serious computing, you're going to want a larger and better interface.
This is one area where the ASUS C202SA is really lacking. The screen's resolution is 1366 x 768, which qualifies it as 720p HD, but the picture it produced honestly didn't feel HD to us. 720p videos watched on other screens looked considerably more crisp than on the C202SA. The colors aren't so vibrant and there isn't much to speak of in terms of contrast, giving everything a muted and dull look. You're not going to hate watching TV shows on this screen, but honestly watching a show on the smaller screen of a nice smartphone is a better experience. This is one area where the Samsung 3 is appreciably better.
The ASUS C202SA was at the back of the main pack in our battery testing, lasting 4.5 hours in our torture test. For this test we really pushed the limits, using a streaming video and maximum screen brightness, so this is the absolute minimum you'd get out of a charge.
Here the ASUS C202SA earned some brownie points thanks to it spill resistant keyboard and ruggedized rubber bits. This makes it great for those of us that are clumsy, or those that are more likely to use a laptop in less than ideal situations where it could easily be dropped or spilled on. At 2.65 pounds and nearly an inch thick, the C202SA isn't exactly thin and light, but it isn't big and heavy either. The Samsung 3 is about the same size and weight, but without the ruggedized parts and spill resistance. To get something lighter you'll unfortunately have to pay more.
At $230 the ASUS C202SA is fairly economical. You certainly sacrifice a lot of performance and quality when compared to the larger models, but for simple tasks this is a decent value. If you don't care about the reinforced rubber and spill resistant keyboard the Samsung 3 is a better value as it costs the same and has a better screen.
The ASUS C202SA isn't going to wow anybody, but for those looking for an inexpensive email/web browsing machine, it works well.
— Max Mutter and Steven Tata