Porter-Cable PCC660 Review
Pros: Inexpensive, decent blade changing system, average cutting power
Cons: Limited battery life, poor sightlines, fiddly adjustments
Compare to Similar Products
$58.07 at Amazon
$79.99 at Amazon
|$69 List||$69 List|
$75.25 at Amazon
$45.64 at Amazon
|Pros||Inexpensive, decent blade changing system, average cutting power||Long-lasting battery, good sightlines, inexpensive||Inexpensive, light-weight, clear sightlines||Good sightlines, light-weight, decent cutting power||Very inexpensive, light-weight, accurate sightlines|
|Cons||Limited battery life, poor sightlines, fiddly adjustments||So-so cutting power, no positive stops, fiddly bevel adjustments||Paltry battery life, below-average cutting power||Limited battery life, so-so blade changing system, minimalistic features||Short battery life, limited cutting power, difficult to change blades|
|Bottom Line||This inexpensive saw is for light-duty applications only||A capable and inexpensive saw that is perfect for handy homeowners and DIYers||An affordable 6 1/2" saw that will satisfy most DIYers with light saw work in mind||This moderately priced saw delivered a middling performance except in battery life where it floundered||This light-duty machine will appeal to novices and pros looking for an inexpensive trim saw|
|Rating Categories||Porter-Cable PCC660||SKIL CR540601||Ryobi P507||Craftsman CMCS500B||Black+Decker BDCCS20B|
|Ease Of Use (50%)|
|Specs||Porter-Cable PCC660||SKIL CR540601||Ryobi P507||Craftsman CMCS500B||Black+Decker BDCCS20B|
|Blade Size (inches)||6.5 in||6.5 in||6.5 in||6.5 in||5.5 in|
|Bevel Positive Stops?||No||No||No||No||No|
|Linear Feet of 3/4" Plywood Cut per Charge||157 ft||324 ft||202 ft||184 ft||52 ft|
|Measured Weight w/o Battery||5.9 lbs||5.8 lbs||5 lbs||5.9lbs||4.6 lbs|
|Measured Max Depth of Cut w/ Framing Blade (inches)||1-29/32 in||1-15/16 in||1-7/8 in||2-1/8 in||1-1/2 in|
|6x12" Cross Cutting Time||6.9 sec||6.6 sec||7.6 sec||5.8 sec||11.1 sec|
|Battery Used in Testing (Amp hours)||4 Ah||5 Ah||4 Ah||4 Ah||1.5 Ah|
Our Analysis and Test Results
What sets the Porter-Cable apart from the class of circular saws is its price tag and its low scores in our ease of use and battery tests. The saw would be much improved if it had a longer-lasting battery and some basic user interface features promoting better cuts while easing user frustration. It should be said that the saw will make some reasonably demanding cuts. However, it protests the action with sluggish blade RPMs and a heightening of the motor pitch — not good signs. Finally, the saw's shoe is rather poorly designed, making bevel adjustments and cuts hard to get right.
We definitely like a saw that is priced low enough that those on a tight budget can enter the market. It's also good that it is capable of making crosscuts and rips of common dimensional lumber. After all, what good is an affordable saw if it doesn't work?
What we don't like about the Porter-Cable is that the saw will quickly be outgrown if the user puts it to regular use. Our concern here is the old adage buy cheap, buy twice. The saw is indeed substantially better than a hand saw. However, it lacks in so many important features — accurate sightlines, proper bevel adjustments, and decent battery life — that it will quickly become an obsolete item if consistently used.
Additionally, we found the blade changing procedure to be a real pain in the you know what. As this is a common point of frustration for the inexperienced user, we think that PORTER_CABLE could have done better on this aspect of the design. As it is, the blade has to be leveraged into place.
We think that the Porter-Cable is an appropriately priced product. However, the saw's value decreases with an increase in use. This means that if you are an infrequent DIYer, this tool's low price is a boon. However, if you plan on using the saw often, then you will likely be shopping for a better product rather quickly because all its shortcomings will become overwhelming and ultimately unbearable.
The Porter-Cable PCC660 is an economy saw to be sure. However, it's important to recognize that the decrease in cost is accompanied by a loss in battery life and numerous ease of use features. We think that this saw will best suit those with infrequent light-duty tasks in mind. Those with plans for more intensive work should set their sights on a higher-quality saw.
— Nick Miley and Austin Palmer