Honeywell HCM-350 Review
Pros: Easy to clean, self-regulating evaporative humidifying
Cons: Requires replacement filters, filter can get moldy if left unattended for too long
Compare to Similar Products
|Price||$75 List||$90 List|
$89.99 at Amazon
$39.99 at Amazon
$41 at Amazon
$55 at Amazon
|Pros||Easy to clean, self-regulating evaporative humidifying||Powerful, accurate humidistat prevents over-humidification, convenient remote control, easy to clean||Exceptional output, low lifetime operating costs||Inexpensive, easy to clean, easy to use||Good humidifying performance|
|Cons||Requires replacement filters, filter can get moldy if left unattended for too long||Somewhat on the expensive side||Confusing user interface, prolonged cleaning process||Not the most powerful, no advanced features||Somewhat difficult to clean|
|Bottom Line||This is a good choice if you appreciate the simplicity of evaporative humidifying||A powerful model with all the bells and whistles you could want, perfect for those looking for high-end performance||With excellent performance ratings and low operating costs, this is one of our favorite models||The perfect budget model for smaller (<150 square foot) rooms||Good for mid-sized bedrooms in arid climates, as long as you don't mind a little cleaning effort|
|Rating Categories||Honeywell HCM-350||Levoit LV600HH||Levoit Classic 200||Honeywell HUL520B||Ultrasonic|
|Humidifying Performance (35%)|
|Ease Of Cleaning (35%)|
|User Friendliness (15%)|
|Operating Cost (15%)|
|Specs||Honeywell HCM-350||Levoit LV600HH||Levoit Classic 200||Honeywell HUL520B||Ultrasonic|
|Weight||9.6 lbs||4.9 lbs||3.5 lbs||3.0 lbs||3.3 lbs|
|Dimensions||18.6" x 10.4" x 13"||11.3" x 7" x 10.5"||13.8" x 7.8" x 5.8"||8.5" x 8.5" x 9.5"||13.3" x 11.4" x 6.8"|
|Tank Capacity||1.0 gallons||1.6 gallons||1.1 gallons||0.5 gallons||1.6 gallons|
|Estimated Lifetime Cost||$203||$159||$99||$56||$98|
|Estimated Annual Electricity Usage||87.6 kWh||65.7 kWh||87.6 kWh||43.8 kWh||65.7 kWh|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Honeywell HCM-350 provides good all-around performance in a package that is very easy to clean. However, it requires replacement filters that push its lifetime cost above that of some of the premium models we tested. It did quite well in our testing earning a Top Pick Award as our favorite evaporative style humidifier. Read on to see how it performed in each of our individual tests.
The Honeywell HCM-350 earned a decent score in our humidifying testing, putting it squarely in the middle of the test lineup. It brought our 150 square foot testing room to 45% humidity in just 34 minutes, almost twice as fast as some other models. It also reached a maximum humidity of 58.9%.
This machine doesn't have a self-regulating humidistat, but it has the advantage of being evaporative rather than sonic. This means it essentially uses a fan to blow air over a wet sponge. Water will naturally stop evaporating from the sponge once the humidity gets too high, so you really don't have to worry about over humidification. You do, however, need to replace that wet sponge 'filter' every six months to maintain optimum performance and cleanliness.
Perhaps the more apt comparison is the Honeywell HCM-350 to the Levoit LV600HH. Though the Levoit costs much more upfront, it is actually less expensive in the long run. It reached 45% humidity in just 30 minutes and has a very accurate self-regulating humidistat. If you can justify spending more money now instead of later, you'll get much better performance.
Ease of Cleaning
This is where the Honeywell HCM-350 really shines, taking the top spot with a near-perfect score. The water tank has a large 3.5-inch opening that makes for easy scrubbing access, and many of the components are dishwasher safe. It is the only model we've encountered that allows you to wash some of the harder-to-clean bits in the dishwasher.
The manual suggests a 15-minute soak in a vinegar solution. It took us a standard 15 minutes to get everything clean, not including the soak. The only reason it didn't earn a perfect score is the filter/wick it uses for evaporative humidifying. If you're not diligent with cleaning and completely drying out the humidifier when it won't be in use, the wick can easily get moldy. If that happens you just have to buy a new wick for less than $10, as it's nearly impossible to clean.
The Honeywell HCM-350 felt fairly intuitive and simple to use and earned an above-average score in our user friendliness testing. Its interface is a single knob that adjusts the speed of the fan that blows air over the wick. The water tank is quite large so you probably won't be able to fill it directly from the sink, but the large 3.5-inch opening makes refilling mess-free. The tank also has a nice handle and easily removes from the machine.
The Honeywell HCM-350 didn't get a higher user-friendliness score because of a few oddities related to its evaporative humidifying method. First off, it makes more noise than any of the other models we tested. It's not loud and just sounds like a small fan, but if you're looking for something quiet this isn't the machine for you. We also found that it made a weird clicking noise when set on its highest setting, which was a bit annoying.
This is the bane of the Honeywell HCM-350. Its fairly low list price saved it from getting a terrible score, but those replacement filters every six months will add up. It also uses a fan instead of a sonic agitator, which uses more electricity than many models (0.02kWh per hour, to be exact). This led to an estimated lifetime cost of $203. This is higher than the estimated lifetime cost of most other models, including the top-performing Levoit LV600HH ($159).
The Honeywell HCM-350 has a reasonable list price, making it quite a good value in the short term. However, its replacement filter costs do add up over time, making it less economical in the long run than some much higher-performing models.
The Honeywell HCM-350 is a good humidifier that can handle medium to large-sized bedrooms and has the advantage of evaporative humidifying that naturally adjusts based on the humidity of the room. However, that evaporative style also requires replacement filters, making this model cost more than average in the long term.
— Max Mutter and Steven Tata