The AT&T TL86103 was above average in scoring with a 60 out of 100, but cost substantially more than any other phone we tested. While it performed well in our tests, and was particularly feature rich, it is hard to justify its MSRP of $150 with its abilities, especially when compared to some of the other models that we tested that cost a little over half as much and performed comparably.
AT&T TL86103 Review
Pros: Tons of features
Cons: Sub par range
Compare to Similar Products
$116.42 at Amazon
$50.54 at Amazon
|$90 List||$70 List|
$58.46 at Amazon
$42.97 at Amazon
|Pros||Tons of features||Very easy to use, great sound quality, solid battery life||Exceptional range, great sound quality, best for linking to cell phones||Excellent range, tons of features||Great sound quality, easy to use|
|Cons||Sub par range||Little light on features||Mediocre battery life, a little pricey||Unimpressive battery life, sound quality could be better||Few features|
|Bottom Line||The priciest phone of the bunch, it has plenty of features but mediocre range||If you want a great cordless phone that is simple and easy to use without a lot of fluff, then this is the model for you||If you are searching for a cordless phone to integrate with your cell phone, then the TL96273 is the clear choice||While the KX-TGE432 came close to scoring an award, it was held back by its less than stellar sound quality and battery life||It has fantastic sound quality and is extremely easy to use, but it is a little on the weak side when it comes to features|
|Rating Categories||AT&T TL86103||AT&T CL82207||AT&T TL96273||Panasonic KX-TGE432||AT&T CRL82212|
|Sound Quality (30%)|
|Ease Of Use (20%)|
|Battery Life (10%)|
|Specs||AT&T TL86103||AT&T CL82207||AT&T TL96273||Panasonic KX-TGE432||AT&T CRL82212|
|Link - to - Cell||Yes||No||Yes||No||No|
|Caller ID announce||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Unobstructed Range Test||700 ft.||840 ft.||840 ft.||840 ft.||840 ft.|
|Obstructed Range Test||180 ft.||300 ft.||300 ft.||350 ft.||220 ft.|
|Call block||Dial *60||Smart Call Blocker*||Dial *60||Up to 250||Dial *60|
|Expandable Handsets||Up to 12||Up to 12||Up to 12||Up to 6||Up to 12|
|Corded (phone) Base||Yes||No||No||No||No|
|Speaker Phone on Base||Yes||No||Yes||No||No|
|Speaker Phone on Handset||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Phone Book Capacity||200 (6000 cell entries)||50||200 (6000 cell entries)||100||50|
|Redial||Last 10 Numbers||Last 10 Numbers||Last 10 Numbers||Yes||Last 10 Numbers|
|Any Key answer||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Push to talk (PTT)||Yes||Yes||Yes||No||No|
|HD Audio w/ equalizer||Yes||Yes||Yes||No||Yes|
|Optional Belt Clip||Yes||No||No||Yes||No|
|Additional Lines||2 Line Capable||No||No||No||No|
Our Analysis and Test Results
This model performed well in our sound quality test, showing an above average performance and tying for the runner-up position with a score of 7 out of 10, closely following our top ranking models by a single point. Our panel of listeners felt that this phone was very clear, just a little bit of static keeping it away from the top score.
The TL86103 scored below average, earning a 4 out of 10. This model made it 700' in our open range test, becoming extremely broken-up and intermittent shortly after that. This was about 140' shorter than our top scoring models.
As expected based on its open-range test, the TL86103 delivered a subpar performance in the obstructed range test, beginning to cut in and out at 180' from the base station.
Ease of Use
This model scored right in the middle for ease of use, scoring a 5 out of 10 on our tests. The handset did have a backlit keypad, with blue numbers that we felt were aesthetically pleasing, but overall it was a bit dim and was only illuminated enough to make dialing out a number easy.
We found that the ringer for the lost handset function was on the quieter side, measured at 61 dBa on our meter at 6' away. The display became hard for us to read at 5' away from the handset, and almost impossible at 6'.
This model ranked about average at navigating through its various menus and slightly above at inputting names to the phonebook, but this phone excelled at linking to a cell phone. It would easily reconnect if the mobile device was brought out of range of the base, and will announce the name of the person calling if the directory is already downloaded.
This model is feature-rich, meriting a score of 8 out of 10. This model can host up to 12 expandable handsets and is also capable of linking to mobile devices. Additionally, there is a corded handset on the main module. This product also has an answering machine. The handsets for this model also have a belt clip and headphone jack for adding an external headset for hands free operation.
The TL86103 had an above average battery life, scoring a 7 out of 10 in this metric. This model lasted for 13 hours and 32 minutes in our talk time test, couple with a manufactured claimed standby time of up to 7 days and a charging time of 11 hours to fully fill the handset battery. Surprisingly, the TL86103 surpasses the manufacturer claimed talk time by 6 hours and 32 minutes.
The TL86103 is the most expensive phone we reviewed, and while it had an above average performance in our tests, we found the high price unpalatable, severely reducing the value of this model.
While this is a capable model of cordless phone, it is hard to recommend this due to its high price, as well as being outperformed in every category that we rated by a different model. This model of phone is capable of linking to mobile devices and is capable of voice command when hooked up to a computer
— David Wise and Austin Palmer