Greenworks 25052 Review
Pros: Inexpensive, simple, minimal maintenance
Cons: Limited cutting heights, manual powered, relatively loud
Compare to Similar Products
|Price||$90 List||$549 List||$400 List||$450 List||$80 List|
$82 at Amazon
|Pros||Inexpensive, simple, minimal maintenance||Extensive runtime, rapid recharge, massive cutting deck width||Great handling, good at edging, broad cutting deck||Fantastic folding mechanism, long-lasting battery, rapid recharge time||Minimal storage footprint, maneuverable|
|Cons||Limited cutting heights, manual powered, relatively loud||Fairly expensive, more mower than some may need||Limited runtime, prolonged recharging||Lacks self-propulsion, below average cutting deck width, stiff bail||Loud, hard to adjust cutting height, no bagging option|
|Bottom Line||This compact, manually powered mower is simple and easy to use on even turf||This long-lasting mower can tackle the biggest jobs without breaking a sweat||An inexpensive mower that delivers above average performance in every category except battery life||An easy to operate mower that is great for those willing to give it a little push||A low maintenance manual mower suited to small, tidy lawns|
|Rating Categories||Greenworks 25052||EGO LM2102SP||Ryobi RY40190-Y||Worx WG774||American Lawn...|
|Ease Of Use (15%)|
|Specs||Greenworks 25052||EGO LM2102SP||Ryobi RY40190-Y||Worx WG774||American Lawn...|
|Estimated Cutting Area||N/A||14,275 ft²||7,031 ft²||12,302 ft²||N/A|
|Measured Recharge Time||N/A||57 mins||250 mins||105 mins||N/A|
|Cutting Deck Width||16"||18 1/8"||17"||15 1/4"||14"|
|Measured Cutting Gap||N/A||3/4"||1/2"||3/4"||N/A|
|Measured Noise||86 dBa||71 dBa||71 dBa||72.4 dBa||86 dBa|
|Power (1 - 10)||Manual powered||7||7||5||Manual powered|
|Folding/Unfolding Ease (1 - 10)||10||9||7||10||10|
Our Analysis and Test Results
What sets this machine apart from the class is that it lacks a motor. This absence can be both a good and bad thing depending on your needs. If you have minimal storage space and your lawn is on the smaller side, and the turf is well maintained, it's a good fit. If you want to mow the back forty and don't want to spend all season doing it, it would be better to look at some of the models with motors. With that in mind, this machine is inexpensive and has virtually no long-term costs.
When compared to other models in the class, the Greenworks 25052 is below average in mowing capability. Our mowing analysis looks at the cutting deck adjustability — this machine has four settings between 1 and 2 inches which is on the shorter side — and the ability to trim long or otherwise dense grass. Given the direct relationship between this mower's forward motion and the revolution of its blades, we weren't surprised that it delivered a subpar performance on uneven and unmaintained turfs. That said, the Greenworks will sheer rougher lawns if the user is game to put in the additional elbow grease.
While the Greenworks 25052 is human-powered, the upshot is that it has a reasonably wide cutting deck (19.5 inches) housing a 16 inch blade. These broad dimensions result in fewer passes required to cover the same square footage as several of its electric cohorts. Additionally, it will both mulch and bag depending on your needs or preference.
The Greenworks 25052 is a manually powered mower and thus, does not have a battery. Given the lack of a battery, it gets really good scores in the runtime and recharge time since the recharge time is zero and the runtime is theoretically infinite. The lack of a battery (and the motor that it would power) could either be a pro or con depending on the size and type of your lawn as well as how regularly the turf requires trimming.
Considering that the Greenworks 25052 is a completely manual mower, we were pleasantly surprised with its above average handling capabilities. As the name suggests, this metric assesses how easy it is to get the mower started and get it where you want it to go. The first step in this analysis is easy for the 25052, you just push it and it's "on". That said, it does take a little bit of umph to get it moving. Once the user and mower are on the move, the handling largely depends on grass type, length, and the user's fitness.
Obviously, a manual mover is going to be more difficult to push than the self-propelled variety. Moreover, uneven ground is especially difficult in the Greenworks' 2 wheel platform, and, given that the blade's effectiveness is governed by one's walking speed, you can't ease into difficult sections. Despite these shortcomings, the blade cuts quite well when the RPM is right. Aside from having to actually push this mower around, it is very easy to maneuver.
Ease of Use
The ease of use analysis is a catch all for the remaining features that have yet to be captured in the other metrics discussed above. Here we take stock of features like the machine's folding mechanism, storage footprint, how easy it is to insert/remove the battery and whether there is a battery life meter. This metric also measures the noise put off by the machine. Given the small size and simplicity of the Greenworks 25052, many of these features are absent as they are not needed. Thus, the machine is all the more easy to operate.
The Greenworks doesn't fold but takes up less footprint space than many of the power mowers we tested. It doesn't have a battery to remove, so it does good there as well. It is, however, among the loudest machines in the class at 86 dBa.
We look at value as a ratio of price to performance. The Greenworks 25052 is one of the most affordable models in the class. At the same time, the machine earned some of the best scores in our evaluation. While we think that this machine is a good value, this appraisal comes with a caveat. If you have a large or demanding lawn, this is not going to be a fitting mower.
The Greenworks 25052 is a quality manual mower. However, that doesn't mean that it is a good fit for every lawn. The mower struggles on uneven ground and in tight spots where the wheel RMP, and thus the blade RPM, necessarily slows down. That said, the machine is effective on well-maintained turf, it's inexpensive, compact, and requires very little maintenance. On an appropriately matched lawn, this unit can't be beat.
— Nick Miley and Austin Palmer