eero Mesh Wifi Router Review
Pros: Easy to set up, expandable
Cons: So-so range between points, can’t turn off frequencies for troubleshooting
Compare to Similar Products
eero Mesh Wifi Router
$79.00 at Amazon
$101.80 at Amazon
$79.99 at Amazon
$43.90 at Amazon
$57.99 at Amazon
|Pros||Easy to set up, expandable||Relatively inexpensive, exceptional range||Very easy to use, more affordable, solid set of features||Super easy to use, fantastic value||Inexpensive, Easy to use|
|Cons||So-so range between points, can't turn off frequencies for troubleshooting||Sparse on features, average throughput||Unimpressive throughput and range||Doesn't have extremely impressive range, so-so set of features||Lackluster throughput, minimal features|
|Bottom Line||If you are trying to set up a mesh network on a budget, then we think this is one of your best options||Good for those with a larger home who are shopping for an upgrade pick on a budget||Great for budget-conscious shoppers that are willing to spend a little bit more to upgrade performance||If you are on a budget and seeking a simple router, this is our recommendation||The Archer C7 isn't the fastest router around, but it's great if you are on a tight budget|
|Rating Categories||eero Mesh Wifi Router||NETGEAR AC1750 (R6400)||Nighthawk AC1750 (R...||TP-Link Archer A6 (...||TP-Link Archer C7 (...|
|Ease Of Use (20%)|
|2 4 Ghz Throughput (20%)|
|5 Ghz Throughput (20%)|
|Specs||eero Mesh Wifi Router||NETGEAR AC1750 (R6400)||Nighthawk AC1750 (R...||TP-Link Archer A6 (...||TP-Link Archer C7 (...|
|Wireless Specification||IEEE802.11a/b/g/n/ac||802.11ac||802.11ac||2.4 GHz: 802.11n
5 GHz: 802.11ac
|LAN Ports Available||5 (total)||4||4||4||4|
|Security||WPA2-PSK, WPA-PSK/WPA2-PSK||WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA/WPA2 Enterprise||WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES], WPA/WPA2 Enterprise||64/128-bit WEP, WPA / WPA2, WPA-PSK/ WPA2-PSK Encryption||WPA/WPA2 Personal, WPA/ WPA2 Enterprise, WEP, TKIP and AES Encryptions|
|Frequency||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz||2.4GHz and 5GHz|
|USB Ports||None||2: 3.0 and 2.0||1: 3.0||None||2: 2.0|
|Dimensions||3.86" x 3.86" x 2.36"||7.2" x 11.22" x 2.4"||7.26" x 11.22" x 1.97"||9.1" x 5.7" x 1.4"||9.6" x 6.4" x 1.3"|
|Antenna||4 internal||3 external||3 external||4 external and 1 internal||3 external|
|Processor||700 MHz quad-core||880 MHz dual-core||1 GHz dual-core||775 MHz single-core||720 MHz single-core|
4GB flash storage
|128 MB Flash
256 MB RAM
|128 MB Flash
256 MB RAM
|N/A||8 MB Flash
128 MB RAM
|2.4 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||39 Mbits/s||47 Mbits/s||48 Mbits/s||38 Mbits/s||36 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Obstructed||53 Mbits/s||37 Mbits/s||47 Mbits/s||30 Mbits/s||42 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||47 Mbits/s||39 Mbits/s||43 Mbits/s||28 Mbits/s||41 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Obstructed||43 Mbits/s||40 Mbits/s||37 Mbits/s||25 Mbits/s||35 Mbits/s|
|2.4 GHz. Long Distance Throughput||6 Mbits/s||22 Mbits/s||25 Mbits/s||9 Mbits/s||9 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||203 Mbits/s||220 Mbits/s||211 Mbits/s||227 Mbits/s||211 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Short Distance Throughput - Obstructed||174 Mbits/s||184 Mbits/s||201 Mbits/s||199 Mbits/s||184 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Line of Sight||176 Mbits/s||196 Mbits/s||211 Mbits/s||178 Mbits/s||192 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Medium Distance Throughput - Obstructed||188 Mbits/s||181 Mbits/s||194 Mbits/s||169 Mbits/s||166 Mbits/s|
|5 GHz. Long Distance Throughput||21 Mbits/s||17 Mbits/s||11 Mbits/s||26 Mbits/s||18 Mbits/s|
|Video Playback Range Test||135 ft.||204 ft.||155 ft.||135 ft.||135 ft.|
Our Analysis and Test Results
If you want the extended coverage area of a mesh network but are intimidated by the technical aspects of setting it up, then the eero is a great option. The hardware is simple to set up and there is a handy companion app that guides you through a hopefully problem-free install.
One of the first things we looked at when it came to rating and ranking these routers is looking at all the different features and functions each one has. The eero did decently well, performing about average in our minds.
Right off the bat, we liked that this wireless router is a great option if you have lots of devices on your network, as it is 2x2 MU-MIMO-capable. This means that it creates two separate queues for devices to access the router, lessening the time each one has to wait for data transfer. The eero also is capable of beamforming for even better signal strength, allowing it to focus the network to optimize performance in the locations you need it most, rather than just emitting equal strength omnidirectionally.
However, it doesn't give you the option for turning on and off the indicator LEDs or a button to run on and off the wireless network. You can reset it remotely through the app or even delete your entire network.
We also found that the eero is a little limited when it comes to physical connections. It doesn't have any USB port and each node only has 2 LAN ports, with one of those occupied by the WAN connection for the modem on the primary node.
Ease of Use
Next, we looked at how convenient and user-friendly each wireless router is for our next metric. We awarded points based on the amount of work it took to get each router set up out of the box, how user-friendly, if there are parental controls that can be enabled, and if the router has Quality of Service (QoS). We didn't find the eero to be incredibly easy to use, with it scoring behind many other routers, but still did alright.
While the eero might not have done exceptionally well in this metric overall, we were impressed with how easy it is to set up — as long as you have a mobile device that can download the app. This router isn't plug and play like many of the other options but the mobile app does guide you smoothly through the setup process.
It walks you through which wires to plug in where and then setting up the SSID and password for the overall network. After you have the primary node configured correctly, you have the option to add additional nodes for the mesh network, with the app showing you the best layout practices and what else you need to do. We also had to update the eero's firmware before we started any of this.
While the app does make it easy to set up the eero, we did find the app to not be the easiest to use. It has a ton of different options and features so we found it to be a little cluttered and easy to miss things until we got used to it.
The app does give you some options for parental controls, though they don't allow for a ton of finesse. It's easy to use, as you can just set large blanket filters for content like adult, illegal, criminal, or violent but we couldn't find a way to block specific sites. The eero also does not have typical QoS, having what it calls Smart Queue Management (SQM). This is still in beta mode when we tested the eero but does give you the option to optimize for gaming or conferencing.
2.4 GHz. Throughput
Our next round of tests rated and compared the data transfer capabilities of each product on both the 2.4 GHz. and 5 GHz. bands, with the testing procedure being the same for both metrics. We used the iPerf3 software to get an average throughput transfer rate from 3 different trials at 3 different distances between the test laptop and the eero. We did a short distance test with 8-10 feet between, a medium distance test with about 35 feet separating them, and a long-distance test with around 70 feet. Additionally, we did a line-of-sight test and an obstructed test at the short and medium distances, with multiple walls between the router and the computer in the obstructed test. The eero delivered a solid set of results, holding its own with some of the top routers of the group.
The eero had an average throughput of 39 Mbit/s in the short distance line of sight test and — somewhat surprisingly — did a bit better with the blocked test, averaging 53 Mbits/s.
For the medium distance test, we got an average throughput of 47 Mbits/s in the unobstructed test, which only dropped to 43 Mbit/s in the test with interference.
Unfortunately, the throughput for this router plummeted quite dramatically when we got some distance between the router and the laptop.
We got a mere average throughput of 5.7 Mbit/s at a distance of 70', with quite a few walls in between as well.
5 GHz. Throughput
Moving on to the 5 GHz. band for testing, we found the overall performance of the eero dropped slightly, performing relatively below average.
This wireless router averaged a throughput of 203 Mbits/s in the short distance, line of sight test, which is about average. However, this did drop to 174 Mbits/s when there was some interference in place, which was a bit below average.
This product did do fairly poorly in our medium distance test, only getting an average throughput of 176 Mbits/s in the line of sight test. However, it did do a bit better in the medium distance with interference, getting an average data throughput rate of 188 Mbits/s.
This router finished out with an alright showing in the long-distance test, with our test software recording an average of 21 Mbit/s of throughput.
Our last round of tests looked at the effective range each of these routers has. As the eero is a mesh system, we only scored the range of a single node to make a more comparable comparison to other products. This product didn't do exceptionally well, having a range that was slightly below average in our test.
For this test, we used the same test computer to see how far from the router we could get and have the same video stream without buffering. The eero maxed out at a distance of 135' before the video started buffering, with the best routers making it over 200'.
If you are looking to set up a mesh network on a budget, then we think the eero is a great option. It's nice that you can build up to a full network with the purchase of additional units, though you do save some money if you buy three in a bundle pack.
The eero is a solid mesh network system that can get you going without breaking the bank and offered decent performance in most of our tests, doing particularly well when it came to being easy to set up.
— David Wise and Austin Palmer