Razor E300 Review
Pros: Smooth ride, powerful single brake
Cons: Slow, does not fold, limited range
Compare to Similar Products
$318.99 at Amazon
$549.98 at Amazon
|$500 List||$350 List||$490 List|
$299.99 at Amazon
|Pros||Smooth ride, powerful single brake||Fast, front suspension, decent travel radius||Smooth ride, long battery life, easy to carry||Pneumatic tires - smooth ride, cruise control feature, really solid safety latch||Good starting scooter, shock absorber on the front tire, lighter weight - easier for transport|
|Cons||Slow, does not fold, limited range||Cruise control defaults to ON, tires quick to wear, steering column lock lacks redundancy||Brakes may require maintenance, long recharge interval||Carrying latch failure, not very fast, no extra suspension||Solid tires - harsher ride, no safety latch, only one lever to close it, lacks the power to climb grades higher than 7%|
|Bottom Line||Despite being a household brand name, this model's poor showing in almost every test category left reviewers struggling to find positive things to report||A relatively inexpensive scooter with a respectable top speed, convenience, and decent travel radius||This do it all scooter combines comfort and utility in a simple yet sharp design||Great budget scooter with unique upgrades rivaling higher end models||Works well for short rides and areas without steep hills|
|Rating Categories||Razor E300||Hiboy MAX||Xiaomi Mi M365||Gotrax GXL V2||Segway Ninebot Kick...|
|Ride Comfort (20%)|
|Specs||Razor E300||Hiboy MAX||Xiaomi Mi M365||Gotrax GXL V2||Segway Ninebot Kick...|
|Measured Maximum Speed||12.0 mph||19.3 mph||14.9 mph||12.5 mph||11.6 mph|
|Measured Effective Range||4.7 miles||12.2 miles||12.8 miles||7 miles||7 miles|
|Measured Charge Time||6 hrs 20 min||4 hours 30 min||5 hrs 10 min||4 hours 15 minutes||5 hours 25 minutes|
|Brake Type||Rear disc brake||Front electronic brake and rear disc brake||Front electronic brake and rear disc brake||Front regen
|Tire Type||Pneumatic||Solid rubber||Pneumatic||Pneumatic||Solid rubber|
|Screen||No||Yes||Battery indicator only||Yes||Yes|
|Maximum Load||220 lbs||220 lbs||220 lbs||220 lbs||220 lbs|
|Measured Weight||42.5 lbs||35.2 lbs||27.2 lbs||26 lbs||25.3 lbs|
|Battery Type||Sealed lead acid||Lithium||Lithium||Lithium||Lithium|
|Motor||250 Watt||350 Watt||Rated 250 Watt
Max 500 Watt
|250 Watt||250 Watt|
Our Analysis and Test Results
This electric scooter has several features that are unique in the class. First, it uses a sealed lead acid battery which is interesting considering that lithium-ion batteries have become the standard. The E300 also uses a chain-driven motor to transfer power to the rear wheel, meaning that there is no electronic hub brake. Finally, the frame and fork are constructed of steel. Given the design and the target consumer (primarily children), it's no wonder that this product failed to meet the standards set by the other scooters here reviewed. It also didn't help that our E300 broke during testing and had to be returned.
This metric is a measure of hill-climbing ability and maximum speed in the flats. To assess the prior, we picked two hills (3.5% and 10.5% grade) and ran the scooter up them - if they could. On the shallower of the two, the E300's max speed was reduced by 5-7 mph. However, one tester noted that he was skeptical that the scooter would have continued were the hill any longer. The steeper grade was not attempted for fear of breaking the product before further tests could be completed. (note: the E300 eventually did break during testing).
To assess speed we took the Razor out with a fully charged battery and cranked the throttle taking it to its maximum cruising speed and timed how long it took to go 100 feet. This trial was run three times and the results were averaged. At 11.95 mph, the E300 is at the bottom of the class.
This metric is simply an assessment of how aware our testers were of rough road surfaces and unexpected cracks. This was one of the categories in which the E300 excelled; mainly due to its 9" pneumatic tires.
To get a grasp on a scooter's braking power we looked at two critical conditions; namely, hill braking and flat ground stopping. The first is an evaluation of the machine's ability to regulate speed when descending a steep hill. The second evaluates the stopping distance on flat ground. Despite having only one (disc) brake, the Razor did quite well in both of these tests. However, the lack of redundancy in the brake system raises safety concerns.
The range metric is an evaluation of travel radius and battery charging time. When we started testing for range we quickly realized that we needed to subdivide travel radius into two parts to accurately describe the performance of the scooters being tested. The first part is the effective range, which is the number of miles traversed at full speed on flat ground. The second part is the maximum range, which is the distance the scooter will go at any speed. Here the E300 shows the problematic nature of its sealed lead acid battery. There is a big gap between the maximum miles (5.9) and the effective miles (4.7) delivered on a charge, and both were well below those delivered by the lithium-ion counterparts. Additionally, the battery was slow to charge taking about 6 ½ hours. The manufacturer notes in the manual that it can take up to 24 hours to fully charge.
The Razor's lack of a folding mechanism for the steering column, its heavy steel frame construction, and its generally bulky design suggest that its designers did not have portability in mind. As such, the scooter received the lowest marks in the class in this category.
Given the general lack of performance delivered, and that our E300 broke within a few days of purchase. We can not say that this product is a good value.
We would recommend that a potential consumer look elsewhere for an electric scooter. Even if you're looking to pick up one of these machines for the kids to play around on in the driveway, there are better options at the price.
— Nick Miley and Austin Palmer
Ad-free. Influence-free. Powered by Testing.
GearLab is founded on the principle of honest, objective, reviews. Our experts test thousands of products each year using thoughtful test plans that bring out key performance differences between competing products. And, to assure complete independence, we buy all the products we test ourselves. No cherry-picked units sent by manufacturers. No sponsored content. No ads. Just real, honest, side-by-side testing and comparison.Learn More