The Best Home Security Cameras of 2018

Who's at the door? Did the kids get home ok? Did Fido get into the Kibble? We tested 14 of the best home security cameras on the market side-by-side so that you could answer all of these questions with a few swipes on your smartphone. Wifi security cameras are becoming more and more common, and while there isn't much evidence that they can prevent burglaries, they are perfect for quelling that nagging fear that something isn't right when you're away from home. However, finding the best model for your specific needs and budget can be a bit daunting, especially with more and more manufacturers making more and more models. Luckily our testing results can cut through the confusion and find your perfect all-seeing eye.

Read the full review below ≫

Test Results and Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 14 ≪ Previous | View All | Next ≫
Rank #1 #8 #4 #2 #7
Product
Nest Cam IQ
NETGEAR Arlo Q
Amazon Cloud Cam
Nest Cam Outdoor
Canary Flex
Awards  Editors' Choice Award      Top Pick Award   
Price $300 List$200 List
$159.95 at Amazon
$120 List
$119.99 at Amazon
$200 List
$184.23 at Amazon
$200 List
$144.99 at Amazon
Overall Score
100
0
86
100
0
70
100
0
77
100
0
80
100
0
70
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Great video quality, smooth real time viewing, field leading monitoring services available, great facial recognitionGood video quality, well designed app, relatively long cloud history available without subscriptionGreat Video quality, good real time viewing, relatively inexpensiveGreat video quality, smooth real time viewing, field leading monitoring services available, weatherproofGood video quality, useful non-subscription services, weatherproof, wireless
Cons Very limited without a subscriptionPoor real time viewing performanceNo scheduling, poor non-subscription servicesVery limited without a subscriptionReal time viewing can be choppy, must be taken down and recharged periodically
Ratings by Category Cam IQ Arlo Q Cloud Cam Cam Outdoor Flex
Monitoring Performance - 30%  
10
0
8
10
0
7
10
0
7
10
0
7
10
0
7
Video Quality - 30%
10
0
9
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
7
App Ease Of Use - 25%
10
0
9
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
9
10
0
8
Real Time Viewing - 15%
10
0
8
10
0
5
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
5
Specs Cam IQ Arlo Q Cloud Cam Cam Outdoor Flex
Maximum Resolution 1080p 1080p 1080p 1080p 1080p
Color Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Power Source Wall Outlet Wall Outlet Wall Outlet Wall Outlet Wall Outlet/Rechargable Battery

Analysis and Award Winners


Review by:
Max Mutter and Steven Tata

Last Updated:
Friday
January 5, 2018

Share:
Updated January 2018
The biggest security camera news of the new year is that Nest has released a IQ version of their outdoor camera. Like the Nest Cam IQ that we already tested, this outdoor version adds advanced facial recognition to an already great camera. You can read more about this technology, and our opinion of it, below.

Best Overall Home Security Camera


Nest Cam IQ


Editors' Choice Award

$300
List Price
See It

Max Resolution: 1080p | Power Source: Standard Outlet

Great video quality
Smooth real time viewing
Field leading monitoring services available
Great facial recognition
Very limited without a subscription
Expensive
Undisputedly the most advanced consumer security camera on the market, the Nest Cam IQ is perfect for those that want the best of the best. It offers all of the high quality video clips, seamless real time viewing, and effective activity zones that Nest is known for, and adds an intricate facial recognition feature. With this function you can teach your camera to ignore familiar faces (your friends and family) and alert you of strange faces (The UPS driver, or a possible intruder). If you don't really care for this facial recognition feature, you can save $100 with the still superb original Nest Cam Indoor. Like all Nest products, the Nest Cam IQ is severely limited without a Nest Aware subscription. If you're looking for a good camera with some generous free services, the NETGEAR Arlo Q provides a 7-day history of activity clips at no extra charge, as opposed to the measly 3 hours you get with a Nest camera without a subscription.

Read review: Nest Cam IQ

Top Pick for Outdoor Camera


Nest Cam Outdoor


Top Pick Award

$184.23
at Amazon
See It

Max Resolution: 1080p | Power Source: Standard Outlet

Great video quality
Smooth real time viewing
Field leading monitoring services available
Weatherproof
Very limited without a subscription
The Nest Cam Outdoor stuffs all of the quality of Nest cameras into a weatherproof package. If you want a high quality video feed of your driveway or front door, this is the camera for you. The only downsides: like with all Nest cameras the functionality is quite limited if you don't buy a Nest Aware subscription. This is even more vital for an outdoor camera, as you'll want to use the activity zones that come with the subscription so you don't get an alert every time a squirrel runs through the front yard. Also, the Nest Cam Outdoor is wired, which limits the placement versatility compared to wireless models, but it also eliminates the chore of taking the camera down to change or recharge batteries every couple weeks. Nest also recently released the Nest Cam IQ Outdoor, which adds facial recognition capabilities, but also ups the price to $350.

Read review: Nest Cam Outdoor

Nest Cameras: Should I upgrade to the IQ version?
Nest now offers both their indoor and outdoor cameras in an IQ version. The only difference between the original and IQ versions is the facial recognition feature, which zooms in and takes a mugshot whenever the camera sees a face. It also raises the price $100 and $150 for the indoor and outdoor version, respectively.

Do you need this feature? If you're willing to spend the extra money and a little time scrolling through mugshots to teach your camera which faces you recognize, so that in turn you can get a different notification when the camera sees a friend versus a stranger, then get the IQ. If that feature doesn't seem important, save some money and go with one of the original versions. One note: due to sticter biometric data laws, the facial recognition feature cannot be used in Illinois.

Best on a Budget


YI 1080p Home


Best Buy Award

$48.18
at Amazon
See It

Max Resolution: 1080p | Power Source: Standard Outlet

Good Video Quality
Decent non-subscription services
Inexpensive
Relatively narrow field of view
Real time viewing sometimes choppy
As the name suggests, the YI 1080p Home offers crisp, high definition footage at a budget price. It also provides a reasonable set of non-subscription services, with a 7 day history of 6 second long motion activated video clips stored on the cloud at no extra cost. Sure, ideally we would like those clips to be longer, but that week long history of short clips is still vastly more useful than the non-subscription offereings of Canary and Nest that offer just 24 and 3 hours of history without a subscription, respectively. For those seeking good video and useful services that don't require another charge on your credit card statement every month, the YI 1080p Home is far and away the best option.

Read review: YI 1080p Home

Best Buy for Outdoor Use


Blink XT


Best Buy Award

$129.99
at Amazon
See It

Max Resolution: 720p | Power Source: 2 Standard AA Batteries

Inexpensive
Good video quality
Poor real time viewing
No subscription services to expand storage
If you're looking for an inexpensive way to get a record of everyone that walks up to your front door, the Blink XT is far and away your best bet. It is weatherproof, runs off of AA batteries and can thus be placed anywhere, and does not require any sort of subscription fee to get access to its video history. It only records when it detects motion, and stores 2 hours of video on the cloud for no extra cost. The only big downside is its real time video feed, which is often quite pixelated and choppy. Therefore we wouldn't recommend this model for checking in on pets, but it excels as a low cost, outdoor monitoring option.

Read review: Blink XT

Top Pick for 24 Hour Monitoring


Logitech Circle


Top Pick Award

$181.99
at Amazon
See It

Max Resolution: 1080p | Power Source: Standard Outlet and Rechargable Battery

Great video quality
Good real time viewing
Convenient day brief time lapse feature
Fisheye distortion slightly more noticeable than on other cameras
The Logitech Circle offers great video quality, good real time viewing, and a decent app. Where it really sets itself apart is its Day Brief feature, which creates a 30 second time lapse at the end of each day comprised of all the moments when the camera detected motion. This means you can view all the activity within a 24 hour period in just half a minute. If you want to know exactly what happens in a particular area on a daily basis, there really isn't an easier way to do it than the Logitech Circle. This earned it a Top Pick nod as the best model for 24 hour monitoring. To boot you get a 24 hour video history stored on the cloud and unlimited downloads, without paying for a subscription.

Read review: Logitech Circle

Great for Amazon Key Users


Amazon Cloud Cam



$119.99
at Amazon
See It

With the introduction of the Amazon Key, the online retailer is trying to solve the problem of having packages stolen off of your front porch once and for all. The smart key gives delivery people a one time code to open your door and place the packages inside. This obviously raises some privacy concerns, so the key is sold in a package with an Amazon Cloud Cam for $250, so you can use the camera to ensure nothing nefarious happens when your door is opened. The announcement of this product left many people wondering if the Cloud Cam is actually a good camera, or if it is only useful for keeping an eye on an Amazon Key enabled door. After testing it we can assure you that the Cloud Cam is a great security camera in its own right, rivaling the original Nest Cam Indoor in terms of performance. Its only weak points are that Amazon currently does not make an outdoor camera, and the fact that you cannot set a schedule for the camera. This means you'll have to use geofencing (your phone's location services) to ensure the camera turns on when you leave the house.

Read review: Amazon Cloud Cam

select up to 5 products
Score Product Price Our Take
86
$300
Editors' Choice Award
The best choice if you want high quality video in conjunction with impressive facial recognition
80
$200
Top Pick Award
Great for outdoor monitoring, but only if you buy the subscription
80
$200
Perfect for looking in on pets, and a good monitoring camera if you pay for a subscription
77
$120
A great camera that rivals the Nest, and really shines for those that want to use the Amazon Key service
73
$200
Top Pick Award
A good camera that offers the most convenient and comprehensive view of the previous 24 hours
72
$200
Great video and sound quality, plus 24 hours of video history without a subscription
70
$200
Wireless capabilities and high quality video make this a very versatile indoor/outdoor camera, but it must be taken down periodically to recharge
70
$200
Good video and generous non-subscription services make this a good budget option in the long term, but poor real time viewing performance limits it usefulness
61
$60
Best Buy Award
A great choice for those looking for the ability to check in on the house, and even see what has happened over the past week, but don't want a to spend a lot on a camera or a subscription
61
$250
Wireless capability makes installation easier, but you do make a bit of a sacrifice in video quality
59
$220
Mediocre all-around performance is out of step with the high list price
56
$130
Best Buy Award
A good, low cost outdoor camera, as long as you don't need a long video history
54
$70
Best Buy Award
Great if you want to save some cash and don't mind somewhat reduced video quality
49
$100
Relatively poor video quality and LED assisted night vision make this a poor choice for general monitoring

All 11 of the cameras we tested. In the top row are (left to right) the Canary Flex  Logitech Circle  NETGEAR Arlo Pro  NETGEAR Arlo  Nest Cam Indor  and the Samsung SmartCam HD Pro. In the bottom row are (left to right) the Nest Cam Outdoor  Canary All-in-One Security Device  YI Dome  Blink  and the NETGEAR Arlo Q.
All 11 of the cameras we tested. In the top row are (left to right) the Canary Flex, Logitech Circle, NETGEAR Arlo Pro, NETGEAR Arlo, Nest Cam Indor, and the Samsung SmartCam HD Pro. In the bottom row are (left to right) the Nest Cam Outdoor, Canary All-in-One Security Device, YI Dome, Blink, and the NETGEAR Arlo Q.

Can These Cameras Replace a Security System?


The short answer is no. Why? All of these cameras require real-time user input to do something like sound an alarm or alert the police. So unless you want to spend your whole vacation staring at your phone waiting for motion detection alerts, one of these cameras won't provide the same protection as a traditional security system. What they can do is provide the peace of mind that comes with being able to see what is happening on the homefront, checking in on pets, making sure your youngsters made it home from school, and can possibly catch a usable shot of an intruder's face. For a more in depth discussion of this topic see our buying advice article.

Analysis and Test Results


The current wifi home security cameras on the market offer the ability to check that all is well on the home front at any time. Though home security cameras do raise some privacy concerns, there are many instances where placing one in your home can provide peace of mind and possibly even increased safety. We spent weeks using 11 of the best security cameras on the market for both live viewing and autonomous recording, then pored over the resulting videos to find out which one is the best.

Our overall scores are based on four different testing metrics: Monitoring Performance, Video Quality, App Ease of Use, and Real Time Viewing. Below we discuss which models shined in each of these metrics, and which did poorly.

Capable cameras like the Canary All-in-One can let you know what is happening in your home at all times.
Capable cameras like the Canary All-in-One can let you know what is happening in your home at all times.

Monitoring Performance


The best video quality in the world won't do you any good if your camera doesn't capture the clips you need, if you can't access the clips that it has captured, or if you get so many extraneous activity alerts that you start ignoring them completely. We split our monitoring performance testing into two categories: monitoring services available both with and without a subscription, and the audio quality associated with the video (because you can sometimes hear more than you can see).


Monitoring Services Available With and Without a Subscription


Nest offers very little to non-subscribers with only a 3 hour video history, activity alerts, and no downloads. Without a subscription Nest cameras are great for live viewing, but not much else. However, a $10 a month subscription earns 10 days of 24/7 video history and the ability to set activity zones. This allows you to define areas where the camera looks for activity, and areas that it will ignore (so you get an alert when someone opens the door, not when the cat runs by). While some other manufacturers offer a similar feature, we found that Nest's was the most effective. The subscription service will also send you a different alert if the cam sees something that it identifies as a person, a rare feature amongst these cameras. There is also a $30 a month plan that gains a 30 day video history. If you have the Nest Cam IQ any of these plans unlock its advanced facial recognition, which can tell the difference between a familiar face (based on some user input) and an unfamiliar one. Despite the poor offering for non-subscribers, the effectiveness of the activity zones earned the Nest Cam Indoor and Nest Cam Outdoor scores of 7 out of 10 in this metric. The facial recognition feature of the Nest Cam IQ earned it an extra point.

Amazon has much more generous non-subscription services than Nest, providing a 24 hour history of motion activated clips for free. Subscriptions start at $7/month or $70/year. The basic level gets a 7 day history of motion activated clips, specific alerts for when the camera sees a person, Amazon zones, which are similar to Nest's motion zones, support for up to 3 cameras. For $10/month or $100/year you get a 14 day histroy and support for up to 5 cameras, and for $20/month or $200/year you get a 30 day history and support for up to 10 cameras. However, all of these histories only include motion activated clips, not the 24/7 history offered by Nest.


Logitech offers 24 hours of video history with its Circle camera, though users can only access clips where motion was detected. This camera sets itself apart with its Day Brief feature, which condenses all of the action detected by the camera throughout the day into a 30 second timelapse. This feature makes it incredibly easy to review what happened throughout the day, and more likely to catch a clip that you need to save (Logitech also offers unlimited downloads without a subscription). The usefulness of this feature garnered a high score of 7 out of 10 for the Circle in this metric. A $4/month subscription gets unlimited downloads and a 14 day video history. $10/month extend the history to 31 days and adds user defined motion zones and the ability to send a different alert when a person is detected (we found both of these features to be less effective than those available with Nest cameras).

Canary recently downgraded both their subscription and non-subscription services. Now, non-subscription users get activity alerts, a 1-day history of 10-second long, motion activated clips, and Canary's version of activity zones (a new addition). With a subscription that history bumps out to 30 days, and the motion activated clips can last as long as 10 minutes. Though we like that you can now use something akin to Nest's activity zones with Canary Cameras, the lack of much non-subscription video history knocked Canary out of the top spot and down to a score of 7 out of 10.

Most motion zones  like those offered by Samsung (left) are restricted to rectangular shapes. Nest's version of the technology (right) is much more customizable.
Most motion zones, like those offered by Samsung (left) are restricted to rectangular shapes. Nest's version of the technology (right) is much more customizable.

NETGEAR cameras offer a large amount of available video history, a full seven days or 1GB, without a subscription plan. This means you can go on a week's vacation and still be able to view everything that happened at home when you get back (unless the camera sees a lot of motion and fills up the 1GB cloud capacity). However, clips are only captured when motion is detected, so you do miss out on the 24/7 video history offered by some other brands. You can download any of the captured clips to save indefinitely. Activity alerts also come standard without a subscription. Of NETGEAR's offerings the Arlo Q was the best performer with a score of 7 out of 10 in this metric. This was mostly due to its expanded subscription offerings ($10 and $20 monthly plans get you 14 and 30 days of 24/7 video history) and decent audio quality. The Arlo Pro earned a 5 due to diminished audio quality and the Arlo scored a 4 due to lack of audio. These cameras are compatible with Arlo's standard monthly subscriptions, where $10 gets you a history of 30 days or 10GB and $15 gets 60 days or 100GB.

The YI Dome Camera boasts a free 7 day cloud history of activity events, but saved clips are limited to 6 seconds, making it likely you'll miss some crucial footage if a significant event occurs. This limitation bumped its score down to a relatively low 5 out of 10 in this metric. We couldn't find any literature stating how long it takes the Dome to reset and record another 6 second clip when there is continuous motion, but in our testing the shortest interval we encountered was 30 seconds. This means, best case scenario, if there is continuous activity in front of the camera it is recording 17% of the action. Two different $10/month plans offer a 15 day history of 6 second clips for up to 5 cameras, or 15 days of 24/7 history for one camera. Both plans can also be upgraded to 30 day histories.

Blink received the lowest score in this metric: 4 out of 10. For free it offers activity alerts and cloud stored clips of recorded activity totalling up to 2 hours of video. Clips can be manually deleted to free up space, so you'll have to remember to empty out your storage before you leave for vacation. There are no subscription plans available to expand upon this storage. The Blinks poor video quality doesn't help either.

The Blink camera stores up to 2 hours of video on the cloud  but does not offer any subscription service to increase that storage.
The Blink camera stores up to 2 hours of video on the cloud, but does not offer any subscription service to increase that storage.

Audio Quality


Both Canary models possessed some of the best microphones we tested. Any conversation had within 30 feet of the camera was perfectly audible when viewing videos on the app (good to know nobody liked the brownies I made for the office…). They don't offer 2-way audio, however, so while you can hear people call your brownies dry and tasteless, you can't yell, "I was just trying to be nice!" at them. You can, however, sound a siren at the push of a button in the instance you catch a burglar in the act.

The new Nest Cam IQ offers an improved microphone over its predecessors, matching the audio quality of the Canary cameras. It also has clear 2-way audio but doesn't offer any sort of alarm like the Canary cameras do.

The microphone of the Amazon Cloud Cam is just behind the quality of the top performers as we were able to understand almost all dialogue spoken in front of the camera. It also offers 2-way audio that is fairly clear. However, the speaker is on the back of the camera, so if you put it in a corner it can sound a bit echoey.

Nest offers the clearest 2-way audio, so if you want your admonishment of the brownie haters to have a vengeful being from above quality, get a Nest. We were also able to easily rouse a cat using the Nest's speaker, but nothing caught the attention of the big, lazy, apathetic dog. Both theLogitech Circle and the NETGEAR Arlo Q have similar quality speakers, but both microphones aren't quite as good.

What is this sorcery? I hear human but do not see it. - A cat mystified by the Nest's clear 2-way audio.
What is this sorcery? I hear human but do not see it. - A cat mystified by the Nest's clear 2-way audio.

Audio captured on the Blink and the upgraded Blink XT cameras is surprisingly good, but does not offer 2-way audio. The NETGEAR Arlo Pro had the worst microphone we tested, with conversations only understandable when people stood close to the camera and there was no background noise. It does have a decent speaker for 2-way audio and a loud siren that can be activated from the corresponding app. The NETGEAR Arlo offers neither a speaker nor microphone, so it lacks any kind of audio experience.

Cameras with 1080p resolution and wider lenses  like the Nest Cam Indoor (left) produce much better footage than those with 720p resolution and narrower lenses  like the YI Dome (right).
Cameras with 1080p resolution and wider lenses, like the Nest Cam Indoor (left) produce much better footage than those with 720p resolution and narrower lenses, like the YI Dome (right).

Video Quality


The most obvious and arguably most relevant performance aspect of wifi home security cameras is video quality. If you can't make out an intruder's face, tell which pup ripped open the kibble bag, or clearly see that everything is in its place, there isn't much point in having a security camera. We tested all of cameras in both day and night with faux break-ins, rambunctious pets, and normal, everyday activity.


Scores in this metric were clumped fairly close together, with 1080p models generally producing much crisper video (in both day and night vision) than their lower resolution counterparts. The Nest Cam IQ and its 4K sensor produced the highest quality video in our testing. Its video is just a shade crisper than that of the 1080p models, but not amazingly so. We think most of that extra resolution goes into its facial recognition function rather than normal video clips, but normal video does see a slight improvement.

The Logitech Circle was the leader for night time video quality. Its super wide 135˚ lens provides a large field of view, but the fisheye quality makes the edges of the look a bit distorted.

Even high definition cameras  like the Canary Flex  often struggled with getting clear footage of motion.
Even high definition cameras, like the Canary Flex, often struggled with getting clear footage of motion.

Also in the groups of top scorers were the Nest Cam Indoor and the Nest Cam Outdoor. Both of these Nest models created top notch daytime footage, and a plush 130˚ field of view with only minor distortion at the edges. The night vision was also very clear, but not the best. The final member of the 8 out of 10 club was the Canary All-in-One Security Device. Its 147˚ wide field of view is the widest of any model we tested, but does create some distortion at the edge of the frame. Both its day and night time image qualities are comparable to those of the Nest.

Also scoring an 8 out of 10, the Amazon Cloud Cam produced crisp video in our testing. The infrared night vision was also slightly better than that of the Nest cameras, rendering fairly bright faces that were often identifiable.

Still providing 1080p resolution, but not in the top group of scorers, was the Canary Flex. It scored a 7 out of 10 in this metric. It still boasts super clear daytime footage, and night vision that is up to par with the top scorers. Its exclusion from the top group was solely due to it relatively narrow 116˚ field of view, which was by far the narrowest of the 1080p models we tested. The NETGEAR Arlo Q also scored a 7. It has a nice 130˚ wide field of view and great daytime video quality, but its night vision was noticeable a step down in clarity when compared to the top scorers.

The Blink XT also provides 1080p resolution and earned a video quality score of 6 out of 10. The video looks fairly crisp, but tends to look a bit dark. This dark quality remained even in well-lit rooms. It has a 110˚ field of view.

It becomes even harder to recognize faces when using night vision  but top performers like the Logitech Circle can get pretty good image if the subject stands still for a second close to the camera.
It becomes even harder to recognize faces when using night vision, but top performers like the Logitech Circle can get pretty good image if the subject stands still for a second close to the camera.

Dropping down into the 720p resolution bracket, the NETGEAR Arlo and NETGEAR Arlo Pro were our top performers, both earning a score of 6 out of 10 in our video quality testing. Day and night time footage of these models still looked fairly crisp, but was clearly inferior when compared side by side with footage from the higher resolution models. The Arlo Pro does provide a wider field of view than the Arlo: 130˚ vs 110˚.

The YI Dome Camera scored a 5 out of 10 in this metric. Both its day and night time videos were noticeably more grainy than the NETGEAR 720p models and has a fairly narrow 112˚ field of view. This is partially compensated for as it can swivel around nearly 360˚. It can also be set to automatically pan to follow moving objects, which does make its effective viewing range much bigger. However, if someone walks quickly past the camera it won't swivel in time to follow them and you'll still be limited to that fairly narrow view.


The Blink received our lowest score of 3 out of 10 in this metric. The relatively low 720p resolution and small lens combined to create the grainiest videos we viewed in our testing. They still provide enough detail to check in on the house or driveway but are reminiscent of watching a youtube video with a bad internet connection. It is also the only camera we tested that does not have infrared night vision. It can still take video at night by turning on a bright LED, but this draws a lot of attention to the camera: not ideal for trying to catch a good image of an intruder. Additionally, because it relies on an actual light its range is very limited at night.

In our testing the Nest Cam app was the easiest to use for browsing video histories and setting schedules.
In our testing the Nest Cam app was the easiest to use for browsing video histories and setting schedules.

App Ease of Use


Once installed, your wifi home security camera's app will be the only way you will interact with it (we found all the cameras were very similar in their initial setup, so we didn't score that aspect of their ease of use). Being able to easily navigate through activity alert histories and live viewing is crucial. We tested app ease of use by having multiple testers install every camera app on their phones (our wireless providers now think we're super paranoid) and assess side by side how easy it was to navigate through each camera's video history, settings, and features. We also forced them to attend to each activity alert they received and to try to adjust the alert setting to see if they could get only the kinds of alerts they wanted.


Nest, in conjunction with its subscription, offers more features and adjustability than any other wifi home security camera manufacturer. They also designed an amazing app with which to navigate those features. The Nest app took home the top score of 9 out of 10 in our app ease of use testing. Browsing video history and adjusting settings is very easy within the app, and the customizable alerts greatly improve the usefulness of the camera. The only bummer: Nest's industry-leading activity zones must be set on a computer and can't be adjusted on the app. Also, remember that the majority of these features aren't available without a subscription.

Amazon's app is very intuitive and lets you easily adjust any setting you'd like. The only reason it didn't receive a top score is the fact that it does not off a scheduling option, so you have to use geofencing to ensure the camera turns on and off when you leave and return home. This isn't a huge deal, but could be annoying if you like to keep your phone's locations services turned off.

NETGEAR also offers a well-designed app for its Arlo cameras, earning a score of 8 out of 10 in this metric. It offers easy management of video history and adjustment of settings. Navigating the app felt just slightly clunkier than the super streamlined Nest app, but was still intuitive.

We found initial setup to be very easy on all of the cameras we tested. Each one had an easy way to get the camera talking to a smartphone  like this sync button on the NETGEAR Arlo Q.
We found initial setup to be very easy on all of the cameras we tested. Each one had an easy way to get the camera talking to a smartphone, like this sync button on the NETGEAR Arlo Q.

We also liked the design of Blink's app, which also scored an 8 out of 10 in this metric. It's very easy to adjust things like clip length and to browse and manage the video history. It is also easy to add multiple cameras, making it clear Blink designed the app to work in conjunction with its multi-camera packages. Though easy to use, the apps basic layout felt just a bit less streamlined than the Nest app, and the nice app couldn't compensate for the poor camera.

Canary's app is well designed and received a score of 7 out of 10 in our ease of use testing. Its menu makes it easy to download clips and adjust notification settings. However, you must swipe down to switch from a live view back to the menu. Sometimes this gesture wasn't recognized and it certainly wasn't the intuitive thing to do on the first go around, hence the slightly lower score.

Logitech's app, used in conjunction with its Circle camera, also scored a 7 in this metric. Navigating through setting and activity histories was fairly quick but noticeably more clunky than on the higher scoring models. It garnered this high score mostly due to the ability to create a 'day brief' at the push of a button that allows you to review all of the activity that occurred over the last day in a concise, 30-second clip.

One of the first things you see when you open the Logitech app is a button to create one of its convenient day briefs.
One of the first things you see when you open the Logitech app is a button to create one of its convenient day briefs.

YI's app is well suited to its Dome Camera but could be a bit more straightforward. It earned a 6 out of 10 in our testing. The app provides a nice little onscreen joystick to move the camera around, but the latency in the camera's response makes it hard to get it just where you want. It's generally easy to adjust settings and browse the video history, but often cryptic symbols are used to represent certain menus rather than words, so there is a small learning curve.

Whether inside or out  Nest made our favorite cameras for real time viewing.
Whether inside or out, Nest made our favorite cameras for real time viewing.

Real Time Viewing


Whether it's the peace of mind that comes with seeing your kids safely home after school, or knowing that the dog hasn't ripped the couch apart, real time viewing is one of the best and most used aspects of wifi home security cameras. We used all of our cameras to look after pets, watch things be shifted around our storage facility, and to snoop on coworkers complaining about free brownies that everyone should appreciate. We also timed latency by walking in front of each camera and then timing how long it took for that to show up in the live view window in the app. (Please note: the latency periods we experienced are not absolute. Different users may experience different latency times based on their internet connection, any possible sources of interference, and a myriad of other factors. However, since we tested all of the cameras under the exact same conditions, our times represent accurate relative comparisons of the latency of each device.)


The Nest Cam IQ, the Nest Cam Indoor, and the Nest Cam Outdoor were our favorite models for real time viewing, all earning an 8 out of 10 in this metric. All three of these models provided continuous, high quality streams that seemingly didn't need to refresh. Additionally, these cameras got close to truly being real time, with only a 4 second lag between action occurring in front of the camera and seeing it in the app.

The Amazon Cloud Cam is teh only mdel we've found that can compete with Nest's real time viewing experience. In testing we were treated to a smooth, high quality feed with very little latency. In fact, if you're mostly looking for a real time viewing camera we would suggest the Cloud Cam over any Nest model, simply because of its lower price.

The Logitech Circle performed well in our real time viewing test, bother earning a 7 out of 10. It had a field-leading 3 seconds of latency, making it the closest to truly providing real time viewing. The Circle scored lower than the Nest because its live streams did pause for a second to refresh once or twice a minute. This wasn't particularly annoying, but made the viewing experience feel much less smooth.

The Nest Cam Outdoor was far and away our favorite outdoor model for real time viewing.
The Nest Cam Outdoor was far and away our favorite outdoor model for real time viewing.

The NETGEAR Arlo picked up a 6 out of 10 in out real time viewing test. It boasts a latency of only 5 seconds, but the feed had to pause and refresh multiple times in just a 30 second span, which felt quite distracting. The Canary All-in-One also earned a score of 6. Its latency of 12 seconds is just on the edge of feeling comically slow, but it generally provides a good, smooth video stream. Occasionally that video would get a bit pixelated, but we didn't feel like it was making us miss what was happening. The final score of 6 went to the YI Dome Camera, which had a fairly low latency of just 5 seconds in our testing. It produced a smooth video stream, but that stream was generally a low quality picture, and certainly not the 720p resolution of the clips saved to the cloud by the Dome.

At the bottom of our score sheet were a number of models that scored a 5 out of 10 in this metric. While these models all provide a high enough quality live stream to reassure yourself that no one has broken into the house, they are infuriating if you're actually trying to watch activity (such as seeing what the pets or kids are up to). The NETGEAR Arlo Q had the worst latency of all of our models (33 seconds in our test), leading to a 'how many times can you run around the office before the Arlo Q sees you' contest. Its picture also had to pause and refresh frequently, and the sound was often a bit choppy.

The Blink constantly stops and asks if you want to continue when using it for real time viewing. It did not amuse our testers.
The Blink constantly stops and asks if you want to continue when using it for real time viewing. It did not amuse our testers.

Also scoring a 5 out of 10 was the NETGEAR Arlo Pro. It posted a decent latency time of 12 seconds in our test but produced a very choppy video of inconsistent quality. The final score of 5 in this metric went to the Canary Flex. Its latency was very slow at 30 seconds, and its video tended to be low quality.

The Blink XT and the Blink shared the bottom score of 4 out of 10 in our real time viewing tests. They actually posted a great latency time of just 5 seconds, but the video was disruptively choppy. Also, it annoyingly stops the video stream every 30 seconds to ask if you want to keep viewing.

Conclusion


There are a number of capable wifi home security cameras available on the market, and the best one for you largely depends on how you plan to use it. We hope our testing results have illuminated the model that will shine in the task you care most about.

Max Mutter and Steven Tata

  • Share this article:

Still not sure? Take a look at our buying advice article for more info.
 

Follow Us

Unbiased.

You Might Also Like