| 81 | | $400 | Chops up the competition, but at a high price |
| 66 | | $200 | Best overall performing model for the price |
| 63 | | $200 | Solid performer and great for those who's main use isn't slicing |
| 63 | | $700 | Most expensive model tested, but the price does not reflect its performance |
| 62 | | $50 | It won't slice down the competition, but will chop up its price tag |
| 62 | | $200 | Great for mixing things up when the elements have you inside |
| 62 | | $300 | Average performance for an upscale price, excellent for slicing |
| 50 | | $200 | Expensive and underperforming |
| 46 | | $40 | Cheap, lowest performing food processor |
